Background: New generation of total trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis using double mobility concept has been used for several years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dislocation rate with this implant after a minimal 3 years of follow-up. Methods: From September 2013 to August 2015, 200 trapeziometacarpal prostheses were implanted in 179 patients. Clinico-radiological follow-up was performed with an average of 48.2 months (36-60 months). Survival rate and dislocation rate were analyzed. Loosening of the implants and other intercurrent events were noticed. Results: Visual analog scale, Quick-DASH, strengths and range of motion improved significantly. We report a survival rate of 97% with only 0.5% of dislocation of prosthesis at 48 months of follow-up. Intercurrent events rate were similar to the ones found in literature or other studies. Conclusions: After a minimal of 3 years of follow-up, prosthesis with double mobility seemed to bring better stability in implant for thumb prosthetic replacement.
NiuJZhangYLaValleyM, et al. Symmetry and clustering of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis in elderly men and women: the Framingham study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(2):343-348.
2.
van SaaseJLvan RomundeLKCatsA, et al. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48(4):271-280.
3.
GervisWH.Excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the trapezio-metacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949;31:537-539.
4.
SandvallBKCameronTENetscherDT, et al. Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb: ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition versus hematoma distraction arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(12):1968-1975.
5.
GangopadhyaySMcKennaHBurkeTDDavisTR.Five- to 18-year follow-up for treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective comparison of excision, tendon interposition, and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(3):411-417.
6.
Cebrian-GomezRLizaur-UtrillaASebastia-ForcadaE, et al. Outcomes of cementless joint prosthesis versus tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019;44:151-158.
7.
GuardiaCLegréRGayA, et al. Complications des trapézectomies. Chir Main. 2011;30:435-436.
8.
WolfJMAtroshiIZhouC, et al. Sick leave after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a population-based study. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(5):439-447.
9.
RouxJ-LAdoueVDilibertoM, et al. Récupération rapide après prothèse trapézo-métacarpienne : intérêt de la double mobilité associée à un ancrage primaire stable. À propos des 100 premiers cas. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2016;35:448.
10.
HuangKHollevoetNGiddinsG.Thumb carpometacarpal joint total arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015;40(4):338-350.
11.
DehlMChelliMLippmannS, et al. Résultats à 10ans de 298 prothèses trapézo-métacarpiennes Rubis II®. Chir Main. 2014;33:436.
12.
SemereAVuillermeNCorcellaD, et al. Results with the Roseland® HAC trapeziometacarpal prosthesis after more than 10 years. Chir Main. 2015;34:59-66.
13.
Martin-FerreroM.Ten-year long-term results of total joint arthroplasties with ARPE(R) implant in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39(8):826-832.
14.
EeckenSVVanhoveWHollevoetN.Trapeziometacarpal joint replacement with the Arpe prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78(6):724-729.
15.
Robles-MolinaMJLopez-CabaFGomez-SanchezRC, et al. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition versus a trapeziometacarpal prosthesis for the treatment of thumb basal joint osteoarthritis. Orthopedics. 2017;40(4):e681-e686.
16.
DeSmetLSioenWSpaepenD.Changes in key pinch strength after excision of the trapezium and total joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29(1):40-41.
17.
JagerTDautelG.Analyse de la douleur postopératoire et des résultats fonctionnels précoces dans le traitement de la rhizarthrose. Étude prospective comparative de 74 patientes trapézectomie-interposition vs prothèse MAIA®. Chir Main. 2013;32:55-62.
18.
Ulrich-VintherMPuggaardHLangeB.Prospective 1-year follow-up study comparing joint prosthesis with tendon interposition arthroplasty in treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(8):1369-1377.
19.
HippensteelKJCalfeeRDardasAZ, et al. Functional outcomes of thumb trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis with a locked plate versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(9):685-692.
20.
ChevalDSauleauVMoineauG, et al. Trapézectomie totale et ligamentoplastie de suspension : une interposition par un implant Pi2® en pyrocarbone a-t-elle un intérêt ?Chir Main. 2013;32:169-175.
21.
GayA-MCerlierAIniestaA, et al. Surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2016;35:238-249.
22.
BarronOAEatonRG.Save the trapezium: double interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of stage IV disease of the basal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(2):196-204.
23.
BrownGD 3rdRohMSStrauchRJ, et al. Radiography and visual pathology of the osteoarthritic scaphotrapezio-trapezoidal joint, and its relationship to trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(5):739-743.
24.
BricoutMRezzoukJ.Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia® prosthesis: a series of 156 cases. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2016;35:190-198.
25.
LemoineSWavreilleGAlnotJY, et al. Second generation Guepar total arthroplasty of the thumb basal joint: 50 months follow-up in 84 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(1):63-69.
26.
OchsnerPE.Osteointegration of orthopaedic devices. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33(3):245-256.
27.
CaekebekePDuerinckxJ.Can surgical guidelines minimize complications after Maïa® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with unconstrained cups?J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(4):420-425.
28.
JacouletP.Results of the ARPE trapezometacarpal prosthesis: a retrospective study of 37 cases. Chir Main. 2005;24(1):24-28.
29.
MaesCDunaudJ-LMoughabghabM, et al. Résultats à plus de cinq ans du traitement de la rhizarthrose par la prothèse Rubis II. À propos de 118 implantations. Chir Main.2010;29(6):360-365.
30.
Goubeau, et al. La prothèses IVORY® : résultats à plus de cinq ans de recul. Etude multicentrique. Chir Main. 2011;30:55-58.
31.
DreantNPoumellecM-A.Total thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty: a retrospective functional study of 28 MOOVIS prostheses. Hand (N Y). 2019;14(1):59-65.
32.
CatonJAslanianTPrudhonJL, et al. La cupule à double mobilité: une nouvelle révolution technique dans la prothèse totale de hanche. Académie Nationale De Chirurgie. 2016;15(1):4–10.
33.
LussiezB. Place of Trapezio-Metacarpal Prosthesis in Surgical Treatment of Carpo-Metacarpal Arthritis. Académie Nationale De Chirurgie. 2017;16(1):11-16.
34.
Bruyère GarnierKDumasRRumelhartC, et al. Comparaison de l’ancrage primaire de cupules trapézométacarpiennes par tests mécaniques. Chir Main. 2001;20:55-62.
35.
AlnotJYBealDOberlinC, et al. GUEPAR total trapeziometacarpal prosthesis in the treatment of arthritis of the thumb. 36 case reports. Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1993;12(2):93-104.
36.
KaszapBDaeckeWJungM.Outcome comparison of primary trapeziectomy versus secondary trapeziectomy following failed total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(5):863-871.e3.
37.
GoubauJGoubauLGoorensC, et al. De Quervain tenosynovitis following trapeziometacarpal ball-and-socket joint replacement. J Wrist Surg. 2015;4(1):35-42.
38.
VissersGGoorensCVanmierloB, et al. Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: 10-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019;44(2):138-145.
