Background: Increasing severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), as graded by nerve conduction studies (NCS), has been demonstrated to predict the speed and completeness of recovery after carpal tunnel release (CTR). The purpose of this study is to compare the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve in patients with severe and nonsevere CTS as defined by NCS. Methods: Ultrasound CSA measurements were taken at the carpal tunnel inlet at the level of the pisiform bone by a hand fellowship–trained orthopedic surgeon. Severe CTS on NCS was defined as no response for the distal motor latency (DML) and/or distal sensory latency (DSL). Results: A total of 274 wrists were enrolled in the study. The median age was 51 years (range: 18-90 years), and 72.6% of wrists were from female patients. CSA of median nerve and age were comparatively the best predictors of severity using a linear regression model and receiver operator curves. Using cutoff of 12 mm2 for severe CTS, the sensitivity and specificity are 37.5% and 81.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Ultrasound can be used to grade severity in younger patients (<65 years) with a CTS-6 score of >12.
AlfonsoCJannSMassaR, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. Neurol Sci. 2010;31(3):243-252.
2.
ArooriSSpenceRA.Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J. 2008;77(1):6-17.
3.
BlandJDRudolferSWellerP.Prospective analysis of the accuracy of diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using a web-based questionnaire. BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e005141.
4.
ChenYTWilliamsLZakMJ, et al. Review of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and a proposed scanning protocol. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(11):2311-2324.
5.
FowlerJRCipolliWHansonT.A comparison of three diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(23):1958-1961.
6.
FowlerJRHirschDKruseK.The reliability of ultrasound measurements of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(10):1992-1995.
7.
FowlerJRMunschMHuangY, et al. Pre-operative electrodiagnostic testing predicts time to resolution of symptoms after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;41(2):137-142.
8.
FowlerJRMunschMTostiR, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: study using a validated clinical tool as the reference standard. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(17):e148.
9.
GrahamB.The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2587-2593.
10.
IbrahimIKhanWSGoddardN, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:69-76.
11.
KasiusKMClaesFVerhagenWI, et al. Ultrasonography in severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2012;45(3):334-337.
12.
MohammadiAAfsharAEtemadiA, et al. Diagnostic value of cross-sectional area of median nerve in grading severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Iran Med. 2010;13(6):516-521.
13.
NakamichiKITachibanaS.Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23(11):1713-1718.
14.
PulikkottilBJSchubMKadowTR, et al. Correlating median nerve cross-sectional area with nerve conduction studies. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(10):958-962.
15.
SrikanteswaraPKCheluvaiahJDAgadiJB, et al. The relationship between nerve conduction study and clinical grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(7):OC13-OC18.
16.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clinical Practice Guideline on The Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2007.
17.
WernerRAAndaryM.Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44(4):597-607.
18.
WittJCHentzJGStevensJC.Carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction studies. Muscle Nerve. 2004;29(4):515-522.
