Background: Ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) surgery is performed for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Improperly performed UNT can create iatrogenic pain and neuropathy. The aim of this study is to identify anatomical structures distal to the medial epicondyle that should be recognized by all surgeons performing UNT to prevent postoperative neuropathy. Methods: Ten cadaveric specimens were dissected with attention to the ulnar nerve. Intramuscular UNT surgery was simulated in each. Distal to the medial epicondyle, any anatomical structure prohibiting transposition of the ulnar nerve to a straight-line course across the flexor-pronator mass was noted and its distance from the medial epicondyle was measured. Results: Seven structures were found distal to the medial epicondyle whose recognition is critical to ensuring a successful anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve: (1) Branches of the medial antebrachial cutaneous (MABC) nerve; (2) Osborne’s fascia; (3) branches from the ulnar nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU); (4) crossing vascular branches from the ulnar artery to the FCU; (5) the distal medial intermuscular septum between the FCU and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS); (6) the combined muscular origins of the flexor-pronator muscles; and (7) the investing fascia of the FDS. Measurements are given for each structure. Conclusions: Poor outcomes and unnecessary revision surgeries for cubital tunnel syndrome can be avoided with intraoperative attention to 7 structures distal to the medial epicondyle. Surgeons should expect to dissect up to 12 cm distal to the medial epicondyle to adequately address these and prevent kinking of the nerve in transposition.
AmadioPCBeckenbaughRD.Entrapment of the ulnar nerve by the deep flexor-pronator aponeurosis. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11(1):83-87.
2.
BartelsRHVerhagenWIvan der WiltGJ, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: part 1. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):522-530.
3.
BiggsMCurtisJA.Randomized, prospective study comparing ulnar neurolysis in situ with submuscular transposition. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(2):296-304.
4.
BroudyASLeffertRDSmithRJ.Technical problems with ulnar nerve transposition at the elbow: findings and results of reoperation. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3(1):85-89.
5.
DellonALMackinnonSE.Injury to the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve during cubital tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 1985;10(1):33-36.
6.
DyCJMackinnonSE.Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9(2):178-184.
7.
GonzalezMHLotfiPBendreA, et al. The ulnar nerve at the elbow and its local branching: an anatomic study. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26(2):142-144.
KaneEKaplanEBSpinnerM.Observations of the course of the ulnar nerve in the arm. Ann Chir. 1973;27(5):487-496.
10.
KaratasAApaydinNUzA, et al. Regional anatomic structures of the elbow that may potentially compress the ulnar nerve. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(4):627-631.
11.
LewisWH. The development of the muscular system. In: KeibelFMallFP eds. Manual of Human Embryology. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1910:454-522.
12.
MacadamSAGandhiRBezuhlyM, et al. Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(8):1314.e1-1324.
13.
MackinnonSENovakCB.Operative findings in reoperation of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2007;2(3):137-143.
MahanMAGascoJMokhteeDB, et al. Anatomical considerations of fascial release in ulnar nerve transposition: a concept revisited. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(5):1216-1222.
16.
SpinnerMKaplanEB.The relationship of the ulnar nerve to the medial intermuscular septum in the arm and its clinical significance. Hand. 1976;8(3):239-242.
