Background: The aim of the study was to compare biomechanical strength, repair times, and repair values for zone II core flexor tendon repairs. Methods: A total of 75 fresh-frozen human cadaveric flexor tendons were harvested from the index through small finger and randomized into one of 5 repair groups: 4-stranded cross-stitch cruciate (4-0 polyester and 4-0 braided suture), 4-stranded double Pennington (2-0 knotless barbed suture), 4-stranded Pennington (4-0 double-stranded braided suture), and 6-stranded modified Lim-Tsai (4-0 looped braided suture). Repairs were measured in situ and their repair times were measured. Tendons were linearly loaded to failure and multiple biomechanical values were measured. The repair value was calculated based on operating room costs, repair times, and suture costs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc statistical analysis were used to compare repair data. Results: The braided cruciate was the strongest repair (P > .05) but the slowest (P > .05), and the 4-stranded Pennington using double-stranded suture was the fastest (P > .05) to perform. The total repair value was the highest for braided cruciate (P > .05) compared with all other repairs. Barbed suture did not outperform any repairs in any categories. Conclusions: The braided cruciate was the strongest of the tested flexor tendon repairs. The 2-mm gapping and maximum load to failure for this repair approached similar historical strength of other 6- and 8-stranded repairs. In this study, suture cost was negligible in the overall repair cost and should be not a determining factor in choosing a repair.
Ben-AmotzOKargelJMaileyBet al. The effect of barbed suture tendon repair on work of flexion. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(5):969-974.
2.
ChauhanAPalmerBAMerrellG.Flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(9):1846-1853.
3.
GordonLMatsuiJMcDonaldEet al. Analysis of a knotless flexor tendon repair using a multifilament stainless steel cable-crimp system. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:677-683.
4.
JordanMCSchmidtKMeffertRHet al. Biomechanical analysis of flexor tendon repair using knotted Kessler and Bunnell techniques and the knotless Bunnell technique. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(1):115-120.
5.
JoyceCWWhatelyKEChanJCet al. Flexor tendon repair: a comparative study between a knotless barbed suture repair and a traditional four-strand monofilament suture repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39:40-45.
6.
MaddoxGELudwigJCraigERet al. Flexor tendon repair with a knotless, bidirectional barbed suture: an in vivo biomechanical analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(5):963-968.
7.
Marrero-AmadeoICChauhanAWardenSJet al. Flexor tendon repair with a knotless barbed suture: a comparative biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:1204-1208.
8.
McClellanWTSchesslerMJRuchDSet al. A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:322e-327e.
9.
McDonaldEGordonJABuckleyJMet al. Comparison of a multifilament stainless steel suture with FiberWire for flexor tendon repairs—an in vitro biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38:418-423.
10.
McLarneyEHoffmanHWolfeSW.Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:295-301.
11.
NayakANNguyenDVBrabenderRCet al. A mechanical evaluation of Zone II flexor tendon repair using a knotless barbed suture versus a traditional braided suture. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(7):1355-1362.
12.
NelsonGNPotterRNtouvaliEet al. Intrasynovial flexor tendon repair: a biomechanical study of variations in suture application in human cadaver. J Orthop Res. 2012;30:1652-1659.
13.
OseiDAStepanJGCalfeeRPet al. The effect of suture caliber and number of core suture strands on zone II flexor tendon repair: a study in human cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(2):262-268.
14.
ParikhPMDavisonSPHigginsJP.Barbed suture tenorrhaphy: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1551-1558.
15.
PowellESTrailIA.Forces transmitted along human flexor tendons during passive and active movements of the fingers. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29:386-389.
16.
SebastinSJHoAKarjalainenTet al. History and evolution of the Kessler repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(3):552-561.
17.
StricklandJW.Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:214-235.
18.
WintersSCGelbermanRHWooSLet al. The effects of multiple-strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: a biomechanical study in dogs. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(1):97-104.
19.
ZeplinPHZahnRKMeffertRHet al. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material: a comparative ex vivo study. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:446-449.
