Burden of Hand Maladies in US Emergency Departments

Abstract

Background: Hand conditions commonly present to the emergency department (ED), yet data are lacking regarding the magnitude of hand-related conditions in the emergency setting. The purpose of this study is to describe the burden and quantify the health care resource utilization of hand conditions seen in EDs across the United States. Methods: Using the National Emergency Department Sample, we identified all ED encounters by patients at least 18 years of age that were associated with a hand condition in 2009 to 2012. The primary outcomes were prevalence, etiology, and associated health care charges for specific categories of hand conditions. Results: The final sample included 34.4 million ED encounters associated with a common hand condition generating $180.4 billion in health care charges. The volume of hand-related presentations varied in a predictable and cyclical manner, peaking in July and waning in December of each year. Trauma was the most common etiology (77.5%) predominantly due to falls (26.2%) and lacerations (19.7%). Over 4 years, the volume of ED encounters rose (5% increase, P < .001) and as did the resulting health care charges (24.6% increase, P < .001). Conclusions: Our study confirms that hand-related conditions contribute significantly to ED volume and consume a growing quantity of health care resources in the United States. The volume of patients presenting to EDs with hand-related conditions fluctuates cyclically throughout the year. Open wounds are the most common cause of presentation and mostly occur in young adults, followed by joint pain, contusions, and fractures.

Keywords

hand hand trauma emergency department epidemiology HCUP NEDS health care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderman

Storey

Chung

. Financial impact of emergency hand trauma on the health care system. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):233-8.

American College of Surgeons. A growing crisis in patient access to emergency surgical care. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2006;91:8-19.

Burt

McCaig

. Staffing, capacity, and ambulance diversion in emergency departments: United States, 2003-04. Adv Data. 2006;376:1-23.

Chen

Narayan

. Economics of upper extremity replantation: national and local trends. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):2003-2011.

Chung

Spilson

. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(5):908-915.

Dias

Garcia-Elias

. Hand injury costs. Injury. 2006;37(11):1071-1077.

Finkelstein

Taubman

Allen

et al . Effect of Medicaid coverage on ED use—further evidence from Oregon’s experiment. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1505-1507.

Friedrich

Poppler

Mack

et al . Epidemiology of upper extremity replantation surgery in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(11):1835-1840.

Gaul

Jr.

Identifiable costs and tangible benefits resulting from the treatment of acute injuries of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12(5, pt 2):966-970.

10.

Hasan

Chung

Storey

et al . Financial impact of hand surgery programs on academic medical centers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(2):627-635.

11.

HCUP Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2009-2012. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nedsoverview.jsp. Accessed February 9, 2017.

12.

Hoxie

Capo

Dennison

et al . The economic impact of electric saw injuries to the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(5):886-889.

13.

Karl

Olson

Rosenwasser

. The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(8):e242-4.

14.

Lipscomb

Schoenfisch

Cameron

. Work-related injuries involving a hand or fingers among union carpenters in Washington State, 1989 to 2008. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(7):832-838.

15.

Pierce

. Does the year-end decline in injury risk reflect reporting error? Am J Ind Med. 2015;58(5):519-527.

16.

Pierce

. The seasonal timing of work-related injuries. Paper presented at: 2013 Joint Statistical Meetings; August 7, 2013; Montreal, CA.

17.

Quan

Sundararajan

Halfon

et al . Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130-1139.

18.

Rosberg

Carlsson

Dahlin

.Prospective study of patients with injuries to the hand and forearm: costs, function, and general health. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39(6):360-369.

19.

Sears

Shin

Prosser

et al . Economic analysis of revision amputation and replantation treatment of finger amputation injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):827-840.

20.

Shale

Tidwell

III Mulligan

et al . A nationwide review of the treatment patterns of traumatic thumb amputations. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(6):647-651.

21.

Sorock

Lombardi

Hauser

et al . A case-crossover study of occupational traumatic hand injury: methods and initial findings. Am J Ind Med. 2001;39(2):171-179.

22.

Thorsén

Rosberg

Steen Carlsson

et al . Digital nerve injuries: epidemiology, results, costs, and impact on daily life. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46(3-4):184-190.

23.

US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. Current population survey data on age and sex, 2009-2012. https://www.census.gov/population/age/data/cps.html. Published July 2016. Accessed January 10, 2017.

24.

Wong

. Time off work in hand injury patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(5):718-725.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB