The original ring method and some of its modified versions were examined with a view to developing a straightforward, universal alternative for use by the textile industry. For this purpose, a total of 42 specimens of commercial woven fabrics differing in composition, weave type and aerial weight were studied by using the FAST method and a modified version of the ring method developed by the authors. Correlation between the results of the two methods was found to depend largely on (a) fabric formability, (b) bending rigidity, and (c) maximum extraction force and the time needed to reach it. Regression equations relating the main variables of the two methods via canonical correlations were developed. The proposed modified version of the ring method allows the easy, inexpensive determination of fabric formability, which was previously possible with the FAST method only.
MogahzyY.E., KilincF.S., HassanH.Developments in measurement and evaluation of fabric hand. pp 45–65. In: “Behery H.M. Effect of mechanical and physical properties on fabric hand”.Woodhead Publishing in Textiles.Cambridge2005.
2.
KawabataS.The standardization and analysis of handle evaluation.The Textile Machinery Society of Japan. 1980. Osaka, Japan.
3.
De BossA., TesterD.H.A system for fabric objective measurement and its application in fabric and garment manufacture. CSIRO Report No. WT92.02. 1994.
4.
GroverG., SultanM.A., SpivakS.M.A screen technique for fabric handle. Journal of Textile Institute, 84 (3), 1993, pp. 1–9.
5.
AlleyV.L., McHattonA.D. Nozzle Extraction Process and Handlemeter for Measuring Handle. United States Patent 4,103,550. August 1, 1978.
6.
SolimanH.A., SultanM.A., ShetaA.M.The Bulletin of Faculty of Engineering.23: 115. 1984. Alexandria University.
7.
SultanM., ShetaA.Predicting fabric hand acceptance for a specific end-use. Textile Information Bulletin, 36 (4), 1994, 57–64.
8.
PanN., YenK.C., ZhaoS.J., YangS.R.A new approach to the objective evaluation of fabric hand from mechanical properties. Part II: Objective measure for total handle. Textile Research Journal, 58. 1988, pp. 438–444.
9.
KimJ., SlatenB.L.Objective assessment of fabric handle in fabric treated with flame retardants. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 24, 1999, pp. 223–228.
10.
KillincF.S.A Study of the Nature of Fabric Comfort: Design-oriented Fabric Comfort Model. PhD Thesis. Auburn University, USA. 2004.
11.
HassanM.Computer-based System for Evaluation and Recognition of the Structural and Surface Characteristics of Fabrics. PhD Thesis. Al Mansoura University, Egypt.2004.
12.
El MogahzyY.E., BroughtonR., WangQ.The friction profile of cotton fibers and its importance in determining fiber performance in the nonwoven process. Part I: Fundamental aspects of fibre friction and lubrication. International Nonwoven Journal6 (4), 1995, pp. 35–42.
13.
MogahzyY.E., BroughtonR., WangQ.The friction profile of cotton fibers and its importance in determining fiber performance in the nonwoven process. Part II: Experimental observations. International Nonwoven Journal7(1), 1995, pp. 26–33.
14.
HennrichL., SeidelA., ReiderO.Griffprüfung au Maschenwaren. Maschen Industrie, 7, 1999, pp. 46–47.
15.
SeidelA.Griffgewertung von Strumpfwaren mit dem ITV-Griff-Tester. Melliand Textilberichte, 6, 2001, pp. 491–494.
16.
MartisiutèG., GutauskasM.A new approach to evaluation of fabric handle. Materials Science. Vol. 7 No 3, 2001, pp. 186–190.
17.
StrazdieneE., GutauskasM.New method for the objective evaluation of textile hand. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe. Vol. 13 No. 2, 2005, pp. 35–38.
18.
StrazdieneE., Ben SaïdS., GutauskasM., SchacherL., AdolpheD.C.The evaluation of fabric treatment by Griff tester and sensory analysis. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology. Vol. 18, No. 5, 2006, pp. 326–334.
19.
DaukantieneV., PapreckieneL., GutauskasM.Simulation and application of the behaviour of the textile fabric while pulling through a round hole. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe. Vol. 11, No 2 (41), 2003, pp. 37–41.
20.
StrazdieneE., MartisiutèG., GutauskasM., PapreckieneL.Textile Hand: A new method for textile objective evaluation. Journal of Textile Institute, 94, Part 1, No. 3–4, 2003, pp. 245–255.
21.
GrineviciuteD., GutauskasM.The comparison of methods for the evaluation of woven fabric hand. Materials Science, Vol. 10, no. 1, 2004, pp. 97–100.
22.
JuodsnukyteD., GutauskasM, KrauledasS.Influence of fabric softners on performance stability of textile materials. Materials Science. Vol. 11, No 2, 2005, pp. 179–182.
23.
GrineviciuteD., DaukantienèV., GutauskasM.Textile Hand: comparison of two evaluation methods. Materials Science, Vol. 11, No 1, 2005, pp. 57–63.
24.
TruncyteD., PapreckieneL., GutauskasM.Behaviour of textile membranes while being pulling through a hole by the constrained method. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol. 15, No 1, 2007, pp. 50–54.
25.
HasaniH., PlanckH.Analysis of the physical fundamentals of an objective integral measuring system for the determination of the handle of knitted fabrics. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol. 17, No 6, 2009, pp. 70–75.
26.
HasaniH.Novel method to evaluate the low-stress shearing behaviour of knitted fabrics. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol. 18, No 2, 2010, pp. 70–72.
27.
PanN., ZeronianS.H., RyuH.S.An alternative approach to the objective measurement of fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 63, 1993, pp. 33–43.
28.
PanN.Quantification and evaluation of human tactile sense towards fabrics. International Journal of Design & Nature, Vol. 1, No 1, 2007, pp. 48–60
WangH., MaharT.J., HallR. (2012). Prediction of the handle characteristics of lightweight next-to-skin knitted fabrics using a fabric extraction technique. Journal of Textile Institute, Vol. 13, No 7, 2012, pp. 691–697.
