The effect of temperature, pressure, and time on the tensile strength of jute fiber composite has been studied. The process of preparing the composite specimens is discussed. The best tensile properties were observed if the composite board is manufactured using high pressure and moderate temperature. For tensile strength, the time does not play a significant role. The study identifies the principal experimental pressure variables, which have the greatest effect on the tensile strength of the composite. The composite boards were subjected to tensile tests and the fractured surfaces were observed under SEM. The SEM photomicrographs of the fractured surfaces of the composite board show diverse extents of fiber pull-outs under tensile failure. The tensile strength values are in good concurrence with predicted values and were found have a correlation coefficient of 96%.
References
1.
BledzkiA.K., and GassanJ.Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibers, Prog. Polym. Sci., 1999, 24: 221–274.
2.
Nabi SahebD., and JogJ. P., Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A Review, Adv. Polym. Technol., 1999, 18(4): 351–363.
3.
EichhornS. J., BaillieC.A., ZafeiropoulusN., MwaikamboL.Y., AnsellM. P., DufresneA., Entwistle, Review: Current International Research into Cellulosic Fibers and Composites, J. Mat. Sci., 2001, 36: 2107–2131.
4.
CrockerJ., “Natural materials innovative natural composites”, Materials Technology, 2008, v. 2, n. 3, 174–178.
5.
MonteiroS.N., “Properties and structure of Attalea funifera piassava fibers for composite reinforcement”, Journal Natural Fibers, 2009, v. 6, n. 2, 191–203.
6.
MarshG., Next step for automotive materials. Materials Today, 2003, 6(4): p. 36–43.
7.
SatyanarayanaK.G., ArizagaG.G.C., WypychF.Biodegradable fibers - an overview, Progress Polymer Science, 2009, v. 34, 982–1021.
8.
SatyanarayanaKG eds., Natural fibre reinforced polymer composites, Old City Publishing Co, Philadelphia, (2009), vol. 1, 473–522.
9.
MohantyA.K., MisraM., and HinrichsenG.Biofibers, biodegradable polymers and bio-composites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng; 2000, 276/277: 1–24.
10.
SinghB., GuptaM., and VermaA., The durability of jute fibre-reinforced phenolic composites. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2000, 60: 581–589.
MohantyA. K., KhanM. A., SahooS., HinrichsenG., “Effect of chemical modification on the performance of Biodegradable Jute yarn – Biopol? Composites”, Journal of Materials Science, 2000, 35(10), 2589–2595.
13.
MohantyA. K., MisraM., HinrichsenG.Biofibers, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites. An overview. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2000, 276–277.
14.
MohantyA. K., MisraM., DrzalL. T.: Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: Opportunity and challenges in the green materials world. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2002, 10, 19–26.
15.
MaguroA.: Vegetable fibres in automotive interior components. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie, 1999, 272, 99–107.
16.
GrossR. A., KarlaB.: Biodegradable polymers for the environment. Science, 2002, 297, 1803–1807.
17.
PugliaD., BiagiottiJ., KennyL. M.: A review on natural fibre-based composites- part II: Application of natural reinforcements in composite materials for automotive industry. Journal of Natural Fibers, 2005, 1, 23–65.
18.
BullionsT. A., GillespieR. A., Price-O'BrienJ., and LoosA. C.The Effect of Maleic Anhydride Modified Polypropylene on the Mechanical Properties of Feather Fiber, Kraft Pulp, Polypropylene Composites, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2004, 92: 3771–3783.
19.
GangulyP. K, SamajpatiS., Book of papers, seminar on technology today – transfer tomorrow(NIRJAFT, Kolkata, India), 1996.
20.
JosephP. V., JosephK., ThomasS.: Short sisal fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: the role of interface modification on ultimate properties. Composite Interfaces, 2002, 9, 171–205.
21.
BorysiakSlawomir, Supermolecular structure of wood/polypropylene composites: I. The influence of processing parameters and chemical treatment of the filler, Polym. Bull., 2010, 64: 275–290.
22.
BoxG.E.P.; BehnkenD.W.: Some new three level design for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics.1960, 2, 455–475.
23.
BoxG.E.P.: Multifactor designs of first order. Biometrika.1952, 39, 49–57.
24.
BoxG.E.P.; DraperN.R.: A basis for the selection of a response surface design. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.1959, 54, 622–654.
25.
BoxG.E.P.; WilsonK.B.: On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. Roy, Statist. Soc, 1957, B131–45.
26.
BoxG.E.P.; HunterJ.S.: Multifactor experimental design for exploring response surfaces. Ann. Math. Statistics, 1957, 28, 195–241.
27.
AnnaduraiG., SheejaR.Y.: Use of Box-Behnken design of experiments for the adsorption of verofix red using biopolymer, Bioprocess Engineering, 1998, 18463–466.
