The inclusion of athletes with and without disabilities in disability sport, known as reverse integration, has received limited attention in the literature. The purpose of this study was to understand players’ experiences in collegiate goalball. One-on-one semistructured interviews were conducted with two males (one with visual impairment, one without impairment) and four females (one with visual impairment, three without impairment) who participated in collegiate goalball programs. Interpretative thematic analysis helped uncover the meaning in participants’ goalball experiences. Reverse integration was used as a conceptual framework to guide the interpretation of participant experiences. Four main themes were extracted from the data: (a) the disability advantage, (b) the building of team cohesion, (c) the disappearing disability, and (d) enjoyment and pride. Participation in collegiate goalball allowed students to see disability as an asset and question assumptions regarding teammates’ abilities. This study highlights the potential value of providing opportunities for people with and without a disability to participate in sport together.
BlockM. E. (2019). Editor’s corner: University adaptive sports programs growing. Palaestra, 33(1), 4.
2.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1992). Qualitative methods for education. Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BrasileF. M. (1990). Wheelchair sports: A new perspective on integration. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 7(1), 3–11.
4.
BrasileF. M. (1992). Inclusion: A developmental perspective. A rejoinder to “examining the concept of reverse integration.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9(4), 293–304.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BrittainI. (2004). Perceptions of disability and their impact upon involvement in sport for people with disabilities at all levels. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 28(4), 429–452.
7.
CaliskanE. (2009). The effects of long term goalball sport on reaction times in blind children by sex and handedness. Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research, 16(3), 97–100.
8.
ÇolakT.BamaçB.AydinM.MeriçB.ÖzbekA. (2004). Physical fitness levels of blind and visually impaired goalball team players. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 12(4), 247–252.
9.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
10.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
11.
Danes-StaplesE.LiebermanL. J.RatcliffJ.RoundsK. (2013). Bullying experiences of individuals with visual impairment: The mitigating role of sport participation. Journal of Sport Behavior, 36(4), 365–386.
12.
DePauwK. P. (1997). The (in)visibility of disability: Cultural contexts and “sporting bodies.”Quest, 49(4), 416–430.
13.
EddyK. A. T.MellalieuS. D. (2003). Mental imagery in athletes with visual impairments. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20(4), 347–368.
14.
e SilvaM. P. M.DuarteE.e SilvaA. A. C.da SilvaH. G. P. V.VitalR. (2011). Aspects of sports injuries in athletes with visual impairment. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 17(5), 319–323.
15.
FaulknerS. L.TrotterS. P. (2017). Data saturation. In MatthesJ.DavisC. S.PotterR. F. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0060
16.
FoleyJ. TTindalD.LiebermanL.KimS. Y. (2007). How to develop disability awareness using the sport education model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 78(9), 32–37.
17.
GulickD. T.MaloneL. A. (2011). Field test for measuring aerobic capacity in paralympic goalball athletes. Athletic Therapy Today, 16(5), 22–25.
18.
HardinB.HardinM. (2003). Conformity and conflict: Wheelchair athletes discuss sport media. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20(3), 246–259.
19.
HoweP. D. (2008). From inside the newsroom: Paralympic media and the production of elite disability. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(2), 135–150.
20.
HoweP. D.JonesC. (2006). Classification of disabled athletes: (Dis)empowering the Paralympic practice community. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23(1), 29–46.
21.
HutzlerY.Chacham-GuberA.ReiterS. (2013). Psychosocial effects of reverse-integrated basketball activity compared to separate and no physical activity in young people with physical disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (1), 579–587.
KarakayaI. C.AkiE.ErgunN. (2009). Physical fitness of visually impaired adolescent goalball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.108.1.129-136
24.
KiuppisF. (2018). Inclusion in sport: Disability and participation. Sport in Society, 21, 4–21.
25.
LindstromH. (1992). Integration of sport for athletes with disabilities into sport programmes for able-bodied athletes. Palaestra, 8(3), 28–32.
26.
LundbergN. R.ZabriskieR. B.SmithK. M.BarneyK. W. (2008). Using wheelchair sports to complement disability awareness curriculum among college students. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 23(1), 61–74.
27.
MedlandJ.Ellis-HillC. (2008). Why do able-bodied people take part in wheelchair sports?Disability and Society, 23(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701841133
NixonH. L. (2007). Constructing diverse sports opportunities for people with disabilities. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 31(4), 417–433.
30.
PonchilliaP. E.ArmbrusterJ.WieboldJ. (2005). The National Sports Education Camps project: Introducing sports skills to students with visual impairments through short-term specialized instruction. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99(11), 587–598.
31.
PonchilliaP. E.PonchilliaS.StrauseB. (2002). Athletes with visual impairments: Attributes and sports participation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(4), 267–272.
32.
SchererR. L.KarasiakF. C.da SilvaS. G.PetroskiÉ. L. (2012). Morphological profile of goalball athletes. European Journal of Human Movement, 28, 1–13.
33.
Spencer-CavaliereN.PeersD. (2011). “What’s the difference?” Women’s wheelchair basketball, reverse integration, and the question(ing) of disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28(4), 291–309.
34.
StamouE.TheodorakisY.KokaridasD.PerkosS.KessanopoulouM. (2007). The effect of self-talk on the penalty execution in goalball. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 25(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619607079800
35.
TaylorS. J.BogdanR.DeVaultM. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.
36.
ThiboutotA.SmithR. W.LabanowichS. (1992). Examining the concept of reverse integration: A response to Brasile’s “new perspective” on integration. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9(4), 283–292.
37.
Van RheeenD. (2016). The blind leading the blind: Goalball as engaged scholarship. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29, 25–34.
38.
ZitomerM. R.GoodwinD. (2014). Gauging the quality of qualitative research in adapted physical activity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 31(3), 193–218.
