The purpose of this investigation was to compare the relationship of intramural sports and Division III athletic participation to retention and academic success in first-year college students. A first-year student cohort (n = 568) was grouped into four categories: no participation, student-athlete, intramural participant, and participant in both. There was no statistically significant difference in academic success among the participant groups, F(6, 1084) = .626, p = .710. Both the student-athlete and intramural participant groups were retained at a higher rate than the no participation group, 4.65% and 10.48%, respectively. Of the 46 student-athletes who discontinued playing varsity sports, only 17 remained at the institution. This investigation supports that intramural sports and Division III varsity athletic participation does not negatively affect grade point average and credit hours earned in first-year students, while demonstrating a positive relationship with retention. The results also highlight the need for intentional intervention and research related to the disengaged student-athlete.
ArtingerL.ClaphamL.HuntC.MegisM.MilordN.SampsonB.ForresterS. A. (2006). The social benefits of intramural sports. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 43, 1–11.
2.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BelchH. A.GebelM.MaasG. M. (2001). Relationship between student recreation complex use, academic performance, and persistence of first-time freshman. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 38, 254–268.
ForresterS. (2015). Benefit of collegiate recreation sports participation: Results from the 2013 NASPA assessment and knowledge consortium study. Recreational Sports Journal, 39, 2–15.
6.
FullerR. (2014). Transition experiences out of intercollegiate athletics: A meta-synthesis. The Qualitative Report, 19, 1–15.
7.
GaylesJ. G.BakerA. R. (2015). Opportunities and challenges for first-year student-athletes transitioning from high school to college. New Directions for Student Leadership, 147, 43–51.
8.
GaylesJ. G.HuS. (2009). The influence of student engagement and sport participation on college outcomes among Division I student-athletes. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 315–333.
9.
GroveJ. R.LavalleeD.GordonS. (1997). Coping with retirement from sport: The influence of athletic identity. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 220–231.
10.
HallD. A. (2006). Participation in a campus recreation program and its effect on student retention. Recreational Sports Journal, 30, 40–45.
11.
KatzM.PfleegorA. G.SchaeperkoetterC.BassJ. (2015). Factors for success in NCAA Division III athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 8, 102–122.
12.
LallyP. (2007). Identity and athletic retirement: A prospective study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 85–99.
13.
LubkerJ. R.EtzelE. F. (2007). College adjustment experiences of first-year students: Disengaged athletes, non-athletes, and current varsity athletes. NASPA Journal, 44, 457–480.
14.
McElveenM.RossowA. (2014). Relationship of intramural participation to GPA and retention in first time in college students. Recreational Sports Journal, 38, 50–54.
15.
McFaddenC.SentaD. (2015). Connecting collegiate recreation and athletics to leadership. New Directions for Student Leadership, 147, 5–18.
16.
MelendezM. C. (2006). The influence of athletic participation on the college student adjustment of freshman and sophomore student athletes. College Student Retention, 8, 39–55.
MirandaM. A. (2009). Anecdote or data: Research on NCAA Division III academic performance and the Division III presidential white papers. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 1, 9–15.
19.
MorrowJ. A.AckermanM. E. (2012). Intention to persist and retention of first-year students: The importance of motivation and sense of belonging. College Student Journal, 46, 483–491.
PhippsC.CooperN.ShoresK.WilliamsR.MizeN. (2015). Examining the relationship between intramural sports participation and sense of community among college students. Recreational Sports Journal, 39, 105–120.
26.
RobstJ.KeilJ. (2000). The relationship between athletic participation and academic performance: Evidence from NCAA Division III. Applied Economics, 32, 547–558.
27.
ScottB. M.PaskusT. S.MirandaM.PetrT. A.McArdleJ. J. (2008). In-seasons vs. out-of-season academic performance of college student-athletes. Journal of Intercollegiate Sports, 1, 202–226.
28.
ShaunetteR.AriesE. (1999). The Division III student-athlete: Academic performance, campus involvement, and growth. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 11–18.
29.
SmithR. K. (2009). A brief history of the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s role in regulating intercollegiate athletics, 11. Marquette Sports Law Review 9. Retrieved fromhttp://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol11/iss1/5
30.
SturmJ. C.FeltzD. L.GilsonT. A. (2011). A comparison of athlete and student identify for Division I and Division III athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34, 295–306.
31.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
TurnerP. (2016). Supporting freshman males during their first-year of college. College Student Journal, 50, 86–94.
33.
WilliamsJ.CollesC.AllenK. J. (2010). Division III athletes: Perceptions of faculty interactions and academic support services. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 3, 211–233.
