AdatoM. (2011). Combining quantitative and qualitative methods for program monitoring and evaluation: Why are mixed-method designs best? (PREM notes and special series on the nuts and bolts of government M&E systems, issue 9). The World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11063
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2021). Projeto de pesquisa: Métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Penso.
4.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2013). Pesquisa de métodos mistos. Penso.
5.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2026). Designing and conducting mixed methodss research (4th ed.) Sage.
6.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N.RawlinsP. (2023). Mapping design trends and evolving directions using the SAGE handbook of mixed methods research design. In PothC. N. (Ed.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods research design (3rd ed. pp. 527–537). Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W.SinleyR. C. (2017). Developing a culturally-specific mixed methods approach to global research. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0453-2
Escalante-BarriosE. L. (2023). Future direction for navigating research cultures in designs: Section 5 conclusions. In PothC. N. (Ed.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods research design (pp. 463–466). Sage.
10.
HarrisJ. (2022). Mixed methods research in developing country contexts: Lessons from field research in six countries across Africa and the Caribbean. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211032825
11.
JagaA.GuettermanT. C. (2023). The value of mixed methods work-family research for human resource management: A review and agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 286–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1964092
12.
KnappertsbuschF.SchreierM.BurzanN.FieldingN. (2023). Innovative applications and future directions in mixed methods and multimethod social research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 24(1). Article 22. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4013
13.
KrysK.VignolesV. L.de AlmeidaI.UchidaY. (2022). Outside the “cultural binary”: Understanding why Latin American collectivist societies foster independent selves. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1166–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211029632
14.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.HitchcockJ. H. (2022). Towards a comprehensive meta-framework for full integration in mixed methods research. In OnwuegbuzieA. J.HitchcockJ. H. (Eds.), The routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 565–606). Routledge.
15.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage.
16.
TimansR.WoutersP.HeilbronJ. (2019). Mixed methods research: What it is and what it could be. Theory and Society, 48(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09345-5