This methodological paper discusses foci for researchers to use when creating procedural diagrams to illustrate different design elements. This paper draws upon the nascent literature describing how researchers create such diagrams and examines a sample of them from the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from its inception until 2024. The procedural diagrams were analyzed using a two-cycle coding procedure, beginning with the constant comparative technique and concluding with deductive coding, utilizing the dimensions of Creamer’s Mixed Methods Evaluation Rubric. Four foci were found: integration, coverage, iteration, and logistics. This paper contributes to the literature by showcasing how procedural diagrams can be designed with these four foci and grounded in considerations of mixed methods quality.
AlatingaK. A.WilliamsJ. J. (2019). Mixed methods research for health policy development in Africa: The case of identifying very poor households for health insurance premium exemptions in Ghana. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816665056
2.
ArnonS.ReichelN. (2009). Closed and open-ended question tools in a telephone survey about “The Good Teacher”: An example of a mixed method study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808331036
3.
Barbosa NevesB.BaeckerR. (2022). Mixing methods and sciences: A longitudinal cross-disciplinary mixed methods study on technology to address social isolation and loneliness in later life. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820977646
4.
BartlamB.WaterfieldJ.BishopA.HoldenM. A.BarlasP.IsmailK. M.KettleC.FosterN. E. (2018). The role of qualitative research in clinical trial development: The EASE back study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816656740
5.
BazeleyP. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage.
6.
BazeleyP.KempL. (2012). Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811419514
7.
BhuyanM. R.ZhangY. (2020). A mixed methods research strategy to study children's play and urban physical environments in Dhaka. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819871820
8.
BrownR. A.KennedyD. P.TuckerJ. S.GolinelliD.WenzelS. L. (2013). Monogamy on the street: A mixed methods study of homeless men. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813480000
9.
BueddefeldJ.MurphyM.OstremJ.HalpennyE. (2021). Methodological bricolage and COVID-19: An illustration from innovative, novel, and adaptive environmental behavior change research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211019496
10.
BustamanteC. (2019). TPACK and teachers of Spanish: Development of a theory-based joint display in a mixed methods research case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817712119
11.
ColditzJ. B.WellingJ.SmithN. A.JamesA. E.PrimackB. A. (2019). World vaping day: Contextualizing vaping culture in online social media using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817702753
12.
CordenA.HirstM. (2008). Implementing a mixed methods approach to explore the financial implications of death of a life partner. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808316808
13.
CreamerE. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage.
14.
CreamerE. (2020). Visualizing dynamic fully integrated mixed method designs. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 12(1), 14.
15.
CreswellJ.Plano ClarkV. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
16.
CronenbergS. (2020). Paradigm parley: A framework for the dialectic stance. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818777925
FettersM. (2020). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage.
19.
FettersM.CurryL.CreswellJ. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
20.
FettersM.FreshwaterD. (2015). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815594687
21.
FettersM.GuettermanT. C. (2021). Development of a joint display as a mixed analysis. In The routledge reviewer's guide to mixed methods analysis. Routledge.
22.
FettersM.YoshiokaT.GreenbergG. M.GorenfloD. W.YeoS. (2007). Advance consent in Japanese during prenatal care for epidural anesthesia during childbirth. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807305274
23.
FormanowiczM.SczesnyS. (2016). Gender-fair language and professional self-reference: The case of female psychologists in Polish. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814550877
24.
GarnerJ. T. (2015). Different ways to disagree: A study of organizational dissent to explore connections between mixed methods research and engaged scholarship. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813515333
25.
GlaserB. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
26.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
27.
GuestG. (2013). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461179
28.
GuettermanT. C.FàbreguesS.SakakibaraR. (2021). Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: A methodological review. Methods in Psychology, 5(2021), Article 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080
29.
HarritsG. S.MøllerM. Ø. (2021). Qualitative vignette experiments: A mixed methods design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820977607
30.
HattaT.NaritaK.YanagiharaK.IshiguroH.MurayamaT.YokodeM. (2020). Crossover mixed analysis in a convergent mixed methods design used to investigate clinical dialogues about cancer treatment in the Japanese context. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818792793
31.
Haynes-BrownT. K.FettersM. (2021). Using joint display as an analytic process: An illustration using bar graphs joint displays from a mixed methods study of how beliefs shape secondary school teachers' use of technology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20(7), Article 1609406921993286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993286
32.
HiroseM.CreswellJ. W. (2023). Applying core quality criteria of mixed methods research to an empirical study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221086346
33.
HoP.ChenK.ShaoA.BaoL.AiA.TarfaA.BrossardD.BrownL.BrauerM. (2021). A mixed methods study of public perception of social distancing: Integrating qualitative and computational analyses for text data. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211020862
34.
HongQ. N.FàbreguesS.BartlettG.BoardmanF.CargoM.DagenaisP.GriffithsF.NicolauB.O’CathainA.RousseauM. C.VedelI.PluyeP. (2018). The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-180221
35.
Howell SmithM. C.BabchukW. A.StevensJ.GarrettA. L.WangS. C.GuettermanT. C. (2020). Modeling the use of mixed methods–grounded theory: Developing scales for a new measurement model. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872599
36.
IvankovaN. V.CreswellJ. W.StickS. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
37.
JangE. E.McDougallD. E.PollonD.HerbertM.RussellP. (2008). Integrative mixed methods data analytic strategies in research on school success in challenging circumstances. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808315323
38.
KameiT.KawadaA.NishimuraN.KakaiH. (2021). A fully longitudinal mixed methods case study design: An example based on the illness trajectory of a person with chronic conditions in home-monitoring-based telenursing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211019512
39.
KleihA.-K.LehbergerM.SparkeK. (2022). Using photographs in mixed methods research: An illustration integrating quantitative and qualitative analyses from consumer research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211056748
40.
KnaflicC. N. (2015). Storytelling with data: A data visualization guide for business professionals (1st edition). Wiley.
41.
KutscherE. L.HowardL. C. (2022). Integration as a process: Applying iterative multiple correspondence analysis to surface dynamic findings. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(3), 328–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211021669
42.
MalekuA.KimY. K.KagothoN.LimY. (2020). Expanding the transformative explanatory sequential mixed methods design archetype in a cross-cultural context: The polemics of African refugee livelihoods in places of resettlement. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 1558689820936378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820936378
MillerD. R.BustamanteC. (2016). Drawing mixed methods procedural diagrams. In Second language assessment and mixed methods research (pp. 84–118). Cambridge University Press.
45.
MorseJ. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189–208). Sage.
46.
NastasiB.HitchcockJ.SarkarS.BurkholderG.VarjasK.JayasenaA. (2007). Mixed methods in intervention research: Theory to adaptation. Journal of Mixed Methods, 1(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298181
47.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
48.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ, 341(1), c4587. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587
49.
PenkunasM. J.MatcharD. B.WongC. H.LiuC.ChanA. W. M. (2020). Using cost-effectiveness analysis in mixed methods research: An evaluation of an integrated care program for frequently hospitalized older adults in Singapore. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819844838
50.
Plano ClarkV.AndersonN.WertzJ. A.ZhouY.SchumacherK.MiaskowskiC. (2015). Conceptualizing longitudinal mixed methods designs: A methodological review of health sciences research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(4), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814543563
51.
Plano ClarkV.SandersK. (2015). The use of visual displays in mixed methods research: Strategies for effectively integrating the quantitative and qualitative components of a study. In McCruddenM. T.SchrawG.BuckendahlC. W. (Eds.), Use of visual displays in research and testing: Coding, interpreting and reporting data (pp. 177–206). Information Age Publishing.
52.
Plano ClarkV.SchumacherK.WestC.EdringtonJ.DunnL. B.HarzstarkA.MeliskoM.RabowM. W.SwiftP. S.MiaskowskiC. (2013). Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812474372
53.
ProudfootK. (2023). Inductive/Deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
54.
PunzianoG.De FalcoC. C.TrezzaD. (2023). Digital mixed content analysis for the study of digital platform social data: An illustration from the analysis of COVID-19 risk perception in the Italian twittersphere. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211067647
55.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
56.
ShannonJ.BorronA.KurtzH.WeaverA. (2020). Re-envisioning emergency food systems using photovoice and concept mapping. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 155868982093778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820933778
57.
ShimM.JohnsonB.BradtJ.GassonS. (2020). A mixed methods–grounded theory design for producing more refined theoretical models. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 311–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820932311
58.
SongM.SandelowskiM.HappM. B. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in conducting mixed methods intervention studies in the health sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 725–747). Sage.
59.
SosulskiM. R.LawrenceC. (2008). Mixing methods for full-strength results: Two welfare studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807312375
60.
StolzJ.LindemannA. (2020). The titanic game: Introducing game heuristics to mixed methods theorizing and data analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819885723
61.
StraussA.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (p. 270). Sage Publications, Inc.
62.
TaghipoorreynehM.de RunE. C. (2020). Using mixed methods research as a tool for developing an Indigenous cultural values instrument in Malaysia. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819857530
63.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage.
64.
van VelzenJ. H. (2018). Students' general knowledge of the learning process: A mixed methods study illustrating integrated data collection and data consolidation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816651792
65.
WallerM. R.NepomnyaschyL.MillerD. P.MingoM. (2021). Using a narrative approach to analyze longitudinal mixed methods data. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820953237
66.
WaltonJ. B.Plano ClarkV. L.FooteL. A.JohnsonC. C. (2020). Navigating intersecting roads in a mixed methods case study: A dissertation journey. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872422
67.
WeselyP. M. (2010). Language learning motivation in early adolescents: Using mixed methods research to explore contradiction. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810375816
