AfonA. O.AdebaraT. M. (2022). Socio-cultural utilization of open spaces in the traditional residential neighborhood of Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Space and Culture, 25(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331219874698
2.
AugéM. (1994). Die Sinnkrise der Gegenwart [The crisis of meaning in the present]. In KuhlmannA. (Ed.), Philosophische Ansichten der Kultur der Moderne (pp. 33–47). Fischer.
3.
BaurN. (2014). Comparing societies and cultures: Challenges of cross‐cultural survey research as an approach to spatial analysis. Historical Social Research, 39(2), 257–291. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.39.2014.2.257-291
4.
BaurN.KelleU.KuckartzU. (2017). Mixed Methods – Stand der Debatte und aktuelle Problemlagen Mixed methods – state of the art and current issues. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Supplement 2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0450-5
5.
BaxterJ. S.MarguinS.MélixS.SchinaglM.SinghA.SommerV. (2021). Hybrid mapping methodology – a manifesto. SFB 1265 Working Paper Nr. 9. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-18197
6.
BhuyanM. R.ZhangY. (2020). A mixed methods research strategy to study children’s play and urban physical environments in Dhaka. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819871820
7.
BittnerC.MichelB. (2018). Qualitative Geographische Informationssysteme: Kontextsensible räumliche Analysen, mixed methods und Geovisualisierungen [Qualitative geographic information systems: Context-sensitive spatial analyses, mixed methods, and geovisualisations]. In WintzerJ. (Ed.), Sozialraum erforschen: Qualitative Methoden in der Geographie (pp. 151–166). Springer Spektrum. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56277-2_10
8.
BrownT. T.WoodJ. D.GriffithD. A. (2017). Using spatial autocorrelation analysis to guide mixed methods survey sample design decisions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 394–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815621438
9.
ChristensenP.MikkelsenM. R.NielsenT. A. S.HarderH. (2011). Children, mobility, and space: Using GPS and mobile phone technologies in ethnographic research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811406121
10.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2019). A checklist of mixed methods elements in a submission for advancing the methodology of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819875832
11.
FoucaultM. (1984). Of other spaces, heterotopias. Architecture, mouvement, continuité, 5, 46–49.
HarbersI.IngramM. C. (2017). Geo-nested analysis: Mixed-methods research with spatially dependent data. Political Analysis, 25(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.4
14.
HeimannT.BarczA.ChristmannG.BembnistaK.Buchta-BartodziejP.MichalakA. (2024). Vulnerability and resilience embedded in discourses: Literature, media, and actors’ cultural knowledge in German and Polish river regions. Space and Culture, 27(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312211030827
15.
KamstraP.FarmerJ.McCoskerA.GardinerF.DaltonH.PerkinsD.BagheriN. (2023). A novel mixed methods approach for integrating not-for-profit service data via qualitative geographic information system to explore authentic experiences of ill-health: A case study of rural mental health. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221135291
16.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space.
17.
LöwM. (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
LowM.SaymanV.SchwererJ.WolfH. (Eds.), (2021). Am Ende der Globalisierung: Uber die Refiguration von Raumen [At the end of globalisation: On the refiguration of spaces]. Transcript.
19.
MarguinS.PelgerD.StollmannJ. (2024). Mappings as joint spatial display. In HeinrichA. J.MarguinS.MillionA.StollmannJ. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative and visual methods in spatial research (pp. 295–311). Transcript.
20.
MasseyD. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour. Macmillan.
21.
Molina-AzorinJ. F.GuettermanT. C. (2023). Special issues on mixed methods research: Expanding the use of mixed methods in disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231183257
22.
Rucks-AhidianaZ.BierbaumA. H. (2015). Qualitative spaces: Integrating spatial analysis for a mixed methods approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691501400208
23.
SchoonenboomJ.JohnsonR. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
24.
Shannon-BakerP. (2023). Call for papers for a special issue on queer approaches to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231201244
25.
SojaE. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso.
26.
TashakkoriA.JohnsonB.TeddlieC. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Sage.
27.
TomarchioL.HerthogsP.TunçerB. (2023). Hybrid art space typologies in Singapore from social media data. City, Culture and Society, 34(1), 100519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100519