Enhancing Qualitative and Quantitative Data Linkages in Complex Mixed Methods Designs: Illustrations From a Multi-phase Healthcare Delivery Study

Abstract

While mixed methods research is increasingly used to examine determinants of unwarranted variability in healthcare delivery and outcomes, novel integrative approaches are required to meet the needs of mixed methods healthcare delivery research. This article describes novel refining strategies that enhance the linkage between qualitative and quantitative dimensions of a mixed methods healthcare delivery research study. Leveraging our study experiences, this paper demonstrates several refining strategies: (1) using mediated allocation concealment to facilitate qualitative sampling; (2) informing qualitative inquiry through quantitative analytics; and (3) training and immersing multidisciplinary researchers in qualitative data collection and analysis. Developing and implementing strategies in mixed methods healthcare delivery research could advance methodological rigor and strengthen multidisciplinary collaboration.

Keywords

healthcare delivery heart failure team science mixed methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bazeley

(2009). Editorial: Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334443

Bernard

H. R.

(2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). AltaMira Press.

Bryman

(2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531

Castro

F. G.

Kellison

J. G.

Boyd

S. J.

Kopak

(2010). A methodology for conducting integrative mixed methods research and data analyses. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916

Chandanabhumma

P. P.

Fàbregues

Oetzel

Duran

Ford

(2023a). Examining the influence of group diversity on the functioning of community-based participatory research partnerships: A mixed methods study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1-2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12626

Chandanabhumma

P. P.

Fetters

M. D.

Pagani

F. D.

Malani

P. N.

Hollingsworth

J. M.

Funk

R. J.

Aaronson

K. D.

Zhang

Kormos

R. L.

Chenoweth

C. E.

Shore

Watt

T. M. F.

Cabrera

Likosky

D. S.

(2020). Understanding and addressing variation in health care-associated infections after durable ventricular assist device therapy: Protocol for a mixed methods study. JMIR Research Protocols, 9(1), Article e14701. https://doi.org/10.2196/14701

Chandanabhumma

P. P.

Zhou

Fetters

M. D.

Likosky

D. S.

(2023b). Expanding our methodological toolbox to improve quality: The role of mixed-methods evaluations. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 16(5), Article e009629. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009629

Creswell

J. W.

Klassen

A. C.

Plano Clark

(2011). Best practices for mixed methods in the health sciences. Bethesda, MD: Office of behavioral and social sciences research. National Institutes of Health.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=BXEzDwAAQBAJ

10.

Curry

L. A.

Krumholz

H. M.

O’Cathain

Plano Clark

V. L.

Cherlin

Bradley

E. H.

(2013). Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 6(1), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967885

11.

Curry

L. A.

O’Cathain

Clark

V. L. P.

Aroni

Fetters

Berg

(2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811416941

12.

Fetters

M. D.

(2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage Publications. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=mG-lDwAAQBAJ

13.

Fetters

M. D.

Curry

L. A.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

14.

Fetters

M. D.

Freshwater

(2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222

15.

Fetters

M. D.

Molina-Azorin

J. F.

(2017). The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066

16.

Fetters

M. D.

Rubinstein

E. B.

(2019). The 3 Cs of content, context, and concepts: A practical approach to recording unstructured field observations. The Annals of Family Medicine, 17(6), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2453

17.

Guetterman

T. C.

Fetters

M. D.

(2018). Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641

18.

Hemmings

Beckett

Kennerly

Yap

(2013). Building a community of research practice: Intragroup team social dynamics in interdisciplinary mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813478468

19.

Kagawa Singer

Dressler

George

Bell

R. A.

Burhansstipanov

Burke

N. J.

Dibble

Elwood

Garro

Gravlee

C. C.

Guarnaccia

Hecht

M. L.

Henderson

Hruschka

Lewis-Fernández

Mouton

Myers

H. F.

Williams

The NIH Expert Panel . (2016). Culture: The missing link in health research. Social Science & Medicine, 170, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.015

20.

Likosky

D. S.

Yang

Zhang

Malani

P. N.

Fetters

M. D.

Strobel

R. J.

Chenoweth

C. E.

Hou

Pagani

F. D.

Michigan Congestive Heart Failure Investigators Abou El Ela

A. S. A. A.

Tang

P. C.

Thompson

M. P.

Aaronson

Shore

Cascino

Salciccioli

K. B.

Nassar

(2022). Interhospital variability in health care-associated infections and payments after durable ventricular assist device implant among Medicare beneficiaries. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 164(5), 1561–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.074

21.

Lunde

Å.

Heggen

Strand

(2013). Knowledge and power: Exploring unproductive interplay between quantitative and qualitative researchers. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812471087

22.

Lynam

Damayanti

Rialine Titaley

Suharno

Bradley

Krentel

(2020). Reframing integration for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819879352

23.

Massey

Alpass

Flett

Lewis

Morriss

Sligo

(2006). Crossing fields: The case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qualitative Research: Quaternary Research, 6(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106062706

24.

Meixner

Spitzner

D. J.

(2023). Leveraging the power of online qualitative inquiry in mixed methods research: Novel prospects and challenges amidst COVID-19. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221084504

25.

Mertens

D. M.

(2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811

26.

Moher

Hopewell

Schulz

K. F.

Montori

Gøtzsche

P. C.

Devereaux

P. J.

Elbourne

Egger

Altman

D. G.

(2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340(mar23 1), c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869

27.

O’Connor

G. T.

Plume

S. K.

Olmstead

E. M.

Morton

J. R.

Maloney

C. T.

Nugent

W. C.

Hernandez

Clough

Leavitt

B. J.

Coffin

L. H.

Marrin

C. A. S.

Wennberg

Birkmeyer

J. D.

Charlesworth

D. C.

Malenka

D. J.

Quinton

H. B.

Kasper

J. F.

Quinton

Carey-Johnson

Zografos

(1996). A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 275(11), 841–846. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530350023029

28.

Sharp

J. L.

Mobley

Hammond

Withington

Drew

Stringfield

Stipanovic

(2012). A mixed methods sampling methodology for a multisite case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811417133

29.

Shaw

E. K.

Ohman-Strickland

P. A.

Piasecki

Hudson

S. V.

Ferrante

J. M.

McDaniel

R. R.

Jr. Nutting

P. A.

Crabtree

B. F.

(2013). Effects of facilitated team meetings and learning collaboratives on colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care practices: A cluster randomized trial. Annals of Family Medicine, 11(3), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1505

30.

The Joint Commission (2024). Tracer methodology fact sheet. https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/news-and-multimedia/fact-sheets/facts-about-tracer-methodology/ (last accessed on May 28, 2024).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB