While mixed methods research is increasingly used to examine determinants of unwarranted variability in healthcare delivery and outcomes, novel integrative approaches are required to meet the needs of mixed methods healthcare delivery research. This article describes novel refining strategies that enhance the linkage between qualitative and quantitative dimensions of a mixed methods healthcare delivery research study. Leveraging our study experiences, this paper demonstrates several refining strategies: (1) using mediated allocation concealment to facilitate qualitative sampling; (2) informing qualitative inquiry through quantitative analytics; and (3) training and immersing multidisciplinary researchers in qualitative data collection and analysis. Developing and implementing strategies in mixed methods healthcare delivery research could advance methodological rigor and strengthen multidisciplinary collaboration.
BazeleyP. (2009). Editorial: Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334443
2.
BernardH. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). AltaMira Press.
3.
BrymanA. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531
4.
CastroF. G.KellisonJ. G.BoydS. J.KopakA. (2010). A methodology for conducting integrative mixed methods research and data analyses. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916
5.
ChandanabhummaP. P.FàbreguesS.OetzelJ.DuranB.FordC. (2023a). Examining the influence of group diversity on the functioning of community-based participatory research partnerships: A mixed methods study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1-2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12626
6.
ChandanabhummaP. P.FettersM. D.PaganiF. D.MalaniP. N.HollingsworthJ. M.FunkR. J.AaronsonK. D.ZhangM.KormosR. L.ChenowethC. E.ShoreS.WattT. M. F.CabreraL.LikoskyD. S. (2020). Understanding and addressing variation in health care-associated infections after durable ventricular assist device therapy: Protocol for a mixed methods study. JMIR Research Protocols, 9(1), Article e14701. https://doi.org/10.2196/14701
7.
ChandanabhummaP. P.ZhouS.FettersM. D.LikoskyD. S. (2023b). Expanding our methodological toolbox to improve quality: The role of mixed-methods evaluations. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 16(5), Article e009629. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009629
8.
CreswellJ. W.KlassenA. C.Plano ClarkV. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods in the health sciences. Bethesda, MD: Office of behavioral and social sciences research. National Institutes of Health.
CurryL. A.KrumholzH. M.O’CathainA.Plano ClarkV. L.CherlinE.BradleyE. H. (2013). Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 6(1), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967885
11.
CurryL. A.O’CathainA.ClarkV. L. P.AroniR.FettersM.BergD. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811416941
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
14.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222
15.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017). The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066
16.
FettersM. D.RubinsteinE. B. (2019). The 3 Cs of content, context, and concepts: A practical approach to recording unstructured field observations. The Annals of Family Medicine, 17(6), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2453
17.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D. (2018). Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641
18.
HemmingsA.BeckettG.KennerlyS.YapT. (2013). Building a community of research practice: Intragroup team social dynamics in interdisciplinary mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813478468
19.
Kagawa SingerM.DresslerW.GeorgeS.BellR. A.BurhansstipanovL.BurkeN. J.DibbleS.ElwoodW.GarroL.GravleeC. C.GuarnacciaP.HechtM. L.HendersonJ.HruschkaD.Lewis-FernándezR.LikeR.MoutonC.MyersH. F.WilliamsD.The NIH Expert Panel. (2016). Culture: The missing link in health research. Social Science & Medicine, 170, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.015
20.
LikoskyD. S.YangG.ZhangM.MalaniP. N.FettersM. D.StrobelR. J.ChenowethC. E.HouH.PaganiF. D.Michigan Congestive Heart Failure InvestigatorsAbou El ElaA. S. A. A.TangP. C.ThompsonM. P.AaronsonK.ShoreS.CascinoT.SalciccioliK. B.NassarK. (2022). Interhospital variability in health care-associated infections and payments after durable ventricular assist device implant among Medicare beneficiaries. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 164(5), 1561–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.074
21.
LundeÅ.HeggenK.StrandR. (2013). Knowledge and power: Exploring unproductive interplay between quantitative and qualitative researchers. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812471087
22.
LynamT.DamayantiR.Rialine TitaleyC.SuharnoN.BradleyM.KrentelA. (2020). Reframing integration for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819879352
23.
MasseyC.AlpassF.FlettR.LewisK.MorrissS.SligoF. (2006). Crossing fields: The case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qualitative Research: Quaternary Research, 6(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106062706
24.
MeixnerC.SpitznerD. J. (2023). Leveraging the power of online qualitative inquiry in mixed methods research: Novel prospects and challenges amidst COVID-19. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221084504
25.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
26.
MoherD.HopewellS.SchulzK. F.MontoriV.GøtzscheP. C.DevereauxP. J.ElbourneD.EggerM.AltmanD. G. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340(mar23 1), c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869
27.
O’ConnorG. T.PlumeS. K.OlmsteadE. M.MortonJ. R.MaloneyC. T.NugentW. C.HernandezF.CloughR.LeavittB. J.CoffinL. H.MarrinC. A. S.WennbergD.BirkmeyerJ. D.CharlesworthD. C.MalenkaD. J.QuintonH. B.KasperJ. F.QuintonH.Carey-JohnsonD.ZografosC. (1996). A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 275(11), 841–846. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530350023029
28.
SharpJ. L.MobleyC.HammondC.WithingtonC.DrewS.StringfieldS.StipanovicN. (2012). A mixed methods sampling methodology for a multisite case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811417133
29.
ShawE. K.Ohman-StricklandP. A.PiaseckiA.HudsonS. V.FerranteJ. M.McDanielR. R.Jr.NuttingP. A.CrabtreeB. F. (2013). Effects of facilitated team meetings and learning collaboratives on colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care practices: A cluster randomized trial. Annals of Family Medicine, 11(3), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1505
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
