This article addresses the essential yet often overlooked aspect of choosing a research topic in mixed methods research studies. Seven leading mixed methods textbooks are reviewed for insights into choosing a research topic which elucidates the dearth of specific guidance in the existing literature. Utilizing the established 13-step framework proposed by Collins et al. (2006), a new step is proposed that incorporates the process of research topic selection. This addition is intended to encourage thoughtful consideration of the research topic and make transparent decisions regarding topic selection, thereby ensuring coherence with the broader mixed methods research process. The framework is presented alongside an exploration of reasons for choosing a research topic and problem and is derived from the reviewed literature.
BennionB. C. (1980). Performance testing of a book and its index as an information retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 31(4), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630310406
2.
BergmanM. M. (Ed.), (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. Sage.
3.
CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.SuttonI. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(1), 67–100.
4.
CreamerE. G. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage.
5.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
6.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GuttmannM. L.HansonE. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research design. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.
ElliottS. (2021). Research problems. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72(4), 913–1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz052
9.
FettersM. D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage.
10.
GlinerJ. A.MorganG. A.LeechN. L. (2017). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
11.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.
12.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. Guilford.
McKimC. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096
15.
MillerS. (2003). Impact of mixed methods and design on inference quality. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 423–455). Sage.
16.
MorganD. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307
17.
MorganD. L. (2014). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Sage.
18.
NewmanI.BenzC. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Southern Illinois University Press.
19.
NewmanI.RidenourC. S.NewmanC.De MarcoG. M. P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 167–188). Sage.
20.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CollinsK. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638
21.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2004). Mixed method and mixed model research. In JohnsonR. B.ChristensenL. B. (Eds.), Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (pp. 408–431). Allyn & Bacon.
22.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
23.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474–498.
24.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.Johnson (2023). Mapping the emerging landscape of mixed analysis. In OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonB. (Eds.), Reviewer’s guide for mixed methods research analysis (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
25.
Plano ClarkV. L.BadieeM. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 275–304). Sage.
26.
TashakkoriA.JohnsonR. B.TeddlieC. (2021). Foundation of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Sage.
27.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage.
28.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Sage.
29.
YounasA.DuranteA.FàbreguesS. (2023). Understanding the nature of and identifying and formulating “research problems” in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231191441.
