CurryL. A.O'CathainA.Plano ClarkV. L.AroniR.FettersM.BergD. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(5), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811416941
2.
FettersM.WuJ. P.ChandanabhummaP. P. (2021). Words matter: Calling on the community of research to recognize, react to, and remove racializing research rhetoric. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820977233
3.
HankivskyO.DanielG. (2015). Understanding and emphasizing difference and intersectionality in multimethod and mixed methods research. In Nagy Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (eds), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 110–127), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.8
4.
OlaghereA. (2022). Reflexive integration of research elements in mixed-method research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221093137
5.
PothC. (2019). Realizing the integrative capacity of educational mixed methods research teams: Using a complexity-sensitive strategy to boost innovation, Mixed Methods special issue of the.International Journal of Research and Method in Education. 42(3), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1590813
6.
PothC. N. (2018). Innovation in mixed methods research: Integrative thinking with complexity. Sage.