When used in an informed and careful manner, the repertory grid technique offers mixed methods researchers a way to quickly gain a deeper understanding of their participants’ concerns, issues, and worldviews. This paper critically assesses the potential contributions of the repertory grid technique when used in mixed methods research. After providing a background survey and description of this relatively little-known research instrument, the strengths and limitations of repertory grids are considered. This report discusses some of the ways that this technique can significantly enhance the quality of the data collected from research participants within the three core models of the mixed method design framework.
BenjafieldJ. (2008). George Kelly: Cognitive psychologist, humanistic psychologist, or something else entirely?History of Psychology, 11(4), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014108.
4.
BergerP.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality (3rd ed.). Penguin.
5.
BlundellJ.WittkowskiAWieckA.HareD. (2012). Using the repertory grid technique to examine nursing staff’s construal of mothers with mental health problems. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.747.
6.
BoyleT. (2005). Improving team performance using repertory grids. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 11(5/6), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590510617756.
7.
BrophyS. (2015). Humanizing healthcare. In WinterD.ReedN. (Eds.), The wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 293–305). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118508275.ch24.
8.
CanningC.HolmesK. (2006). Community consultation in developing museum projects: A case study using the repertory grid technique. Cultural Trends, 15(4), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548960600922590.
9.
ChitsabesanP.CorbettS.WalkerL.SpencerJ.BartonJ. (2006). Describing clinical teachers’ characteristics and behaviours using critical incidents and repertory grids. Medical Education, 40(7), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02510.x.
10.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2007). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
11.
CreamerE. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
12.
CreswellJ.Plano ClarkV. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
13.
CreswellJ. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808330883.
14.
DayR.BamfordJ. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 136–141.
15.
DayR.BamfordJ. (2004). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
16.
DenicoloP.LongT.Bradley-ColeK. (2016). Constructivist approaches and research methods: A practical guide to exploring personal meanings. SAGE Publications, Ltd.
17.
DonaghueH. (2003). An instrument to elicit teachers’ beliefs and assumptions. ELT Journal, 57(4), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.344.
18.
Easterby-SmithM. (1981). The design, analysis and interpretation of repertory grids. In ShawM. (Ed.), Recent advances in personal construct technology (pp. 9–30). Academic Press.
19.
Easterby-SmithM.ThorpeR.HolmanD. (1996). Using repertory grids in management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599610114138.
20.
EptingF. (2016). George Kelly: A revealing moment. In WinterD.ReedN. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 24–33). Wiley Blackwell.
21.
FassinY.WernerA.Van RossemA.SignoriS.GarrigaE.von Weltzien HoivikH.SchliererH. (2015). CSR and related terms in sme owner–managers’ mental models in six european countries: National context matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2098-7.
22.
FeilzerM. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691.
23.
FettersM. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage Publications, Ltd.
24.
FettersM.Molina-AzorinJ. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066.
25.
FransellaF. (1995). George Kelly. Sage Publications.
26.
FransellaF. (2005). Some skills and tools for personal construct users. In FransellaF. (Ed.), The essential practitioner’s handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 41–56). John Wiley & Sons, LTD.
27.
FransellaF.NeimeyerR. (2005). George Alexander Kelly: The man and his theory. In FransellaF. (Ed.), The essential practitioner’s handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 3–14). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013370.ch2.
28.
HadleyG.CharlesM. (2017). Enhancing extensive reading with data-driven learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 131–152.
29.
HadleyG.EvansC. (2001). Constructions across a cultural gap. In EdgeJ. (Ed.), Action research (pp. 129–143). TESOL.
30.
HemmingsA.BeckettG.KennerlyS.YapT. (2013). Building a community of research practice: Intragroup team social dynamics in interdisciplinary mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813478468.
31.
HinkleD. (1970). The game of personal constructs. In BannisterD. (Ed.), Perspectives in personal constuct theory (pp. 91–110). Academic Press.
32.
HowesL. M. (2017). Developing the methodology for an applied, interdisciplinary research project: Documenting the journey toward philosophical clarity. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815622018.
33.
JankowiczD. (2004). The easy guide to repertory grids. Wiley.
34.
JohnsT. (1991). Should you be persuaded - two examples of data-driven learning materials. English Language Research Journal, 4. 1–16
35.
JohnsonR.de WallC.StefurakT.HildebrandD. (2017). Understanding the philosophical positions of classical and neopragmatists for mixed methods research. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0452-3.
36.
JukkaM.AndreevaT.BlomqvistK.PuumalainenK. (2017). A cross-cultural perspective on relational exchange. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(7), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2016-0048.
37.
KellyG. (1955/1991). The psychology of personal constructs: A theory of personality (Vol. 1 of 2). Routledge.
38.
KellyG. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. W. W. Norton.
39.
KingtonA.SammonsP.DayC.ReganE. (2011). Stories and statistics: Describing a mixed methods study of effective classroom practice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810396092.
40.
KorthagenF. (1992). Techniques for stimulating reflection in teacher education seminars. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(3), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(92)90025-X.
41.
LeachC.FreshwaterK. (2005). Analysis of repertory grids in critical practice. In MilesJ.GilbertP. (Eds.), A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 125–146). Oxford University Press.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811.
44.
MireauxM.CoxD.CottonA.EvansG. (2007). An adaptation of repertory grid methodology to evaluate Australian consumers’ perceptions of food products produced by novel technologies. Food Quality and Preference, 18(6), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.01.012.
45.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462.
46.
NeimeyerR. (2000). Kelly, George Alexander. In KazdinA. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology: 8 volume set (Vol. 4, pp. 439–441). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10519-181.
47.
OscarsonM.ApelgrenB. (2011). Mapping language teachers’ conceptions of student assessment procedures in relation to grading: A two-stage empirical inquiry. System, 39(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.014.
48.
PigadaM.SchimittN. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1–28.
49.
PikeS. (2007). Repertory grid analysis in group settings to elicit salient destination image attributes. Current Issues in Tourism, 10(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.2167/citMP010.0.
50.
PopeM.DenicoloP. (2000). Transformative education: Personal construct approaches to practice and research. Whurr Publishers/John Wiley & Sons.
51.
PopeM.KeenT. (1981). Personal construct psychology and education. Academic Press.
52.
ProcterH. (2016). Personal construct psychology, society, and culture: A review. In WinterD.ReedN. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 139–153). Wiley Blackwell.
53.
PurzerŞ. (2011). The relationship between team discourse, self-efficacy, and individual achievement: A sequential mixed-methods study. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00031.x.
54.
RadA.WahlbergO.ÖhmanP. (2013). How lending officers construe assessments of small and medium-sized enterprise loan applications: A repertory grid study. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 26(4), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2013.812856.
55.
RogersB.RyalsL. (2007). Using the repertory grid to access the underlying realities in key account relationships. International Journal of Market Research, 49(5), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530704900506.
56.
RoweGLambertN.BowlingA.EbrahimS.WakelingI.ThomsonR. (2005). Assessing patients’ preferences for treatments for angina using a modified repertory grid method. Social Science & Medicine, 60(11), 2585–2595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.019.
57.
SanscartierM. (2020). The craft attitude: Navigating mess in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818816248.
58.
SendanF.RobertsJ. (1998). Orhan: A case study in the development of a student teacher’s personal theories. Teachers and Teaching, 4(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060980040203.
59.
ShawM. (1980). On becoming a personal scientist: Interactive computer elicitation of personal models of the world. Academic Press.
ShawM.McKnightC. (1981). Think again: Personal problem-solving and decision-making. Prentice-Hall.
62.
SongS.GaleA. (2008). Investigating project managers’ work values by repertory grids interviews. Journal of Management Development, 27(6), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810877811.
63.
SonnenbergLPritchard-WiartL.HodgsonC.YuY.KingS. (2017). Assessment of resident physicians’ communicator and collaborator competencies by interprofessional clinicians: A mixed-methods study. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 29(4), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2017.1301817.
64.
SteynbergL.GrundlingJ.LiuB.LiY. (2019). A multiphase mixed methods approach to internationalisation of South African higher education: A research framework outline 18th European conference on research methodology for business and management studies. Academic Conferences and Publishing International 2019. Wits Business School, University of Witwatersrand, 312–321. https://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/36421/1/ECRM19-Proceedings-Download.pdf#page=327
65.
TanF.HunterM. (2002). The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 39–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132340.
66.
TashakkoriA.JohnsonR.TeddlieC. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc.
67.
TaylorA. (2015). Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a mixed methods research design to explore music in the lives of mature age amateur keyboard players. Music Education Research, 17(4), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2014.906397.
68.
WalkerB.CrittendenN. (2012). The use of laddering: Techniques, applications and problems. In CaputiP.VineyL.WalkerB.CrittendenN. (Eds.), Personal construct methodology (pp. 71–88). Wiley-Blackwell.
69.
WebbS.van OostveenR.BarberW.ChildsE. (2019). Co-creation of the digital space: Examining the use of web-based tools in fully online learning community (folc) environments. EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2019. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/210135.
70.
WilliamsS. (2001). Predications of the limit concept: An application of repertory grids. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.2307/749699.
71.
YorkeD. (1978). Repertory grids in educational research: Some methodological considerations. British Educational Research Journal, 4(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192780040205.
72.
YoshidaH. (2014). An approach to extensive reading: Active involvement during sustained silent reading. The Language Teacher, 38(6), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.37546/jalttlt38.6-3.
