DejonckheereM.Lindquist-GrantzR.ToramanS.HaddadK.VaughnL. (2018). Intersection of mixed methods and community-based participatory research: A methodological review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689818778469
2.
EdwardsJ. R. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should . . . overcome methodological barriers to progress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 469-491. doi:10.1002/job.529
3.
IsraelB.EngE.SchulzA.ParkerE. (2013). Methods for community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
IvankovaN. (2015). Mixed methods applications in action research: From methods to community action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 221-225. doi:10.1177/1558689807302811
6.
MertensD. M. (2011). Mixed methods as tools for social change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 195-197. doi:10.1177/1558689811418095
7.
MertensD. M. (2015). Mixed methods and wicked problems. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(1), 3-6. doi:10.1177/1558689814562944
8.
MertensD. M.BazeleyP.BowlegL.FieldingN.MaxwellJ.Molina-AzorinJ. F.NiglasK. (2016a). The future of mixed methods: A five year projection to 2020. Retrieved from https://mmira.wildapricot.org
9.
MertensD. M.BazeleyP.BowlegL.FieldingN.MaxwellJ.Molina-AzorinJ. F.NiglasK. (2016b). Expanding thinking through a kaleidoscopic look into the future: Implications of the Mixed Methods International Research Association’s Task Force Report on the future of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 221-227. doi:10.1177/1558689816649719
10.
New Directions for Evaluation. (2013). Special issue: Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, Summer(138), 1-119.
11.
TsuiA. S. (2013). The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 9(3), 375-394. doi:10.1111/more.12035
