BustamanteC. (2019). TPACK and teachers of Spanish: Development of a theory-based joint display in a mixed methods research case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 163-178. doi:10.1177/1558689817712119
2.
ColditzJ. B.WellingJ.SmithN. A.JamesA. E.PrimackB. A. (2019). World Vaping day: Contextualizing Vaping culture in online social media using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 196-215. doi:10.1177/1558689817702753
3.
CornetC.BlumenfieldT. (Eds.). (2016). Doing fieldwork in China . . . with kids! The dynamics of accompanied fieldwork in the People’s Republic. Copenhagen, Denmark: NIAS Press.
4.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2019). New requirements to include the methodological contribution for papers published in theJournal of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 138-142. doi:10.1177/1558689819834753
5.
GuettermanT. C.BabchukW. A.Howell SmithM. C.StevensJ. (2019). Contemporary approaches to mixed methods–grounded theory research: A field-based analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 179-195. doi: 10.1177/1558689817710877
6.
HammersleyM. (2018). Commentary—On the “indistinguishability thesis”: A response to Morgan. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 256-261. doi: 10.1177/1558689818772764
7.
HashemiM. R.MoghaddamI. G. (2019). A mixed methods genre analysis of the discussion section of MMR articles in applied linguistics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 242-260. doi:10.1177/1558689816674626
8.
HorvathK.LatchevaR. (2019). Mixing methods in the age of migration politics: A commentary on validity and reflexivity in current migration research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 127-131. doi:10.1177/1558689818822445
9.
JohnsonR. B.RussoF.SchoonenboomJ. (2019). Causation in mixed methods research: The meeting of philosophy, science, and practice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 143-162. doi:10.1177/1558689817719610
10.
KacperskiC.UlloaR.HallC. (2019). Do athletes imagine being the best, or crossing the finish line first? A mixed methods analysis of construal levels in elite athletes’ spontaneous imagery. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 216-241. doi:10.1177/1558689816674563
11.
LeavyP. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
MaxwellJ. A. (2019). Distinguishing between quantitative and qualitative research: A response to Morgan. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 132-137. doi:10.1177/1558689819828255
13.
MorganD. L. (2018a). Living within blurry boundaries: The value of distinguishing between qualitative and quantitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 268-279. doi:10.1177/1558689816686433
14.
MorganD. L. (2018b). Rebuttal. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 260-261. doi:10.1177/1558689818772764
15.
Nappier CherupA. (2019). Media review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 261-262. doi:10.1177/1558689817706813
16.
SandelowskiM. (2018). A reluctant but necessary rebuttal to a rebuttal. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(4), 366-368. doi: 10.1177/1558689818799427
17.
SandersK. (2019). Media review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 263-265. doi: 10.1177/1558689817751775
