Growing numbers of researchers are using mixed methods to study migration, often
highlighting the practical reasons connected with policy engagement. However, in
this article we emphasize epistemological and theoretical rather than purely
practical reasons for using mixed methods in the study of migration.
Specifically, we argue that mixed methods designs are well suited to research
that attempts to explain sociopolitical action within a post-positivist
epistemological framework. We provide an example of this approach in the
Diaspora Engagement Policies Project, a 5-year project to explain the global
proliferation of formal government institutions for emigrants and their
descendants.
AbdiH.ValentinD. (2007). Multiple correspondence
analysis. In SalkindN. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and
statistics (pp. 651-657).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
2.
AdamsonP. (2014). Classical philosophy: A history of
philosophy without any gaps. Oxford,
England: Oxford University
Press.
3.
AguniasD. R. (2009). Closing the distance: How
governments strengthen ties with their diasporas.
Washington, DC: Migration
Policy Institute.
4.
AguniasD. R.NewlandK. (2012). Developing a road map for engaging
diasporas in development: A handbook for policymakers and practitioners in
home and host countries. Washington,
DC: Migration Policy
Institute.
5.
BaileyT. C.GatrellA. C. (1995). Interactive spatial data
analysis. Harlow, England:
Pearson Education.
6.
BaxterJ.EylesJ. (1997). Evaluating qualitative
research in social geography: Establishing “rigour” in interview
analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers, 22,
505-525.
7.
BelsleyD. A.KuhE.WelshR. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying
influential data and sources of collinearity. New
York, NY:
Wiley.
8.
BlaikieN. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry
polity. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University
Press.
9.
BrandL. A. (2006). Citizens abroad: Emigration and the
state in the Middle East and North Africa.
Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.
10.
BustamanteT. (2011). On MacCormick’s
post-positivism: Comment on Karen Petroski’s “Is Post-Positivism
Possible?”German Law Journal, 12,
693-727.
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano-ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed
methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
12.
CohenJ. (2003). Applied multiple
regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences.
London, England: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative,
quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd
ed.). London, England:
Sage.
14.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research:
Meaning and perspective in the research process.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
15.
CruickshankJ. (2011). The positive and the negative:
Assessing critical realism and social constructionism as post-positivist
approaches to empirical research in the social sciences
(International Migration Institute Working Paper 42). Oxford,
England: University of
Oxford.
16.
DaigneaultP.-M.JacobS. (2014). Unexpected but most welcome:
Mixed methods for the validation and revision of the participatory
evaluation measurement instrument. Journal of Mixed
Methods Research, 8(1),
6-24.
17.
DélanoA.GamlenA. (2014). Comparing and theorizing
state–diaspora relations. Political
Geography, 41,
43-53.
18.
DescartesR. (1984). Principia philosophiae
[Principles of philosophy]
(MillerR. P., Trans.). Berlin, Germany:
Springer Science + Business Media.
(Original work published 1644)
19.
DexterL. A. (2006). Elite and specialized
interviewing. Colchester, England:
European Consortium for Political
Research.
20.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in
mixed methods designs: Principles and practices.
Health Services Research, 48,
2134-2156.
21.
FindlayA. M.LiF. L. N. (1999). Methodological issues in
researching migration. The Professional
Geographer, 51(1),
50-59.
22.
FoxJ. (1997). Applied regression analysis, linear
models, and related methods. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
23.
FoxN. J. (2008).
Postpositivism. In GivenL. M. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research
methods (Vol. 2, pp.
659-664). Thousand
Oaks:
Sage.
24.
GamlenA. (2006). Diaspora engagement policies: What
are they, and what kinds of states use them? (COMPAS Working Paper
06-32). Oxford,
England: University of
Oxford.
25.
GamlenA. (2008). The emigration state and the
modern geopolitical imagination. Political
Geography, 27,
840-856.
26.
GamlenA. (2014a). Diaspora
governance. In AndersonB.KeithM. (Eds.), Migration: The COMPAS anthology (pp.
21-23). Oxford,
England: Centre on Migration, Policy and
Society.
27.
GamlenA. (2014b). Diaspora institutions and
diaspora governance. International Migration
Review, 48,
S180-S217.
28.
GamlenA. (2015a). Explaining diaspora
engagement policies. In CohenR.StoryJ. (Eds.), The impact of diasporas (pp.
22-24). Oxford,
England: Oxford Diasporas
Programme.
29.
GamlenA. (2015b). The rise of diaspora
institutions. In SigonaN.GamlenA.LibertoreG.Neveu-KringelbachH. (Eds.), Diasporas re-imagined: Spaces, practices and
belonging (pp. 166-171).
Oxford, England: Oxford
Diasporas Programme.
30.
GamlenA.BettsA.DélanoA.LacroixT.PaolettiE.SigonaN.Vargas-SilvaC. (2013). Faultlines and contact
zones: A new forum for migration studies. Migration
Studies, 1(1),
1-3.
31.
GamlenA.CummingsM.VaalerP.RossouwL. (2013). Explaining the rise of diaspora
institutions (International Migration Institute Working Paper 78).
Oxford, England: University
of Oxford.
GiddensA. (1987). Social theory and modern
sociology. Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
34.
GoldsteinK. (2002). Getting in the door:
Sampling and completing elite interviews. PS:
Political Science & Politics, 35,
669-672.
35.
GuestG. (2013). Describing mixed method
research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of
Mixed Methods Research, 7(2),
141-151.
36.
HendersonK. A. (2011). Post-positivism and the
pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure
Sciences, 33,
341-346.
37.
Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (2013). Coming at things
differently: Future directions of possible engagement with mixed methods
research. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 7(2),
103-109.
38.
HeyvaertM.HannesK.MaesB.OnghenaP. (2013). Critical appraisal of mixed
methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 7(4),
302-327.
39.
Hoffmeyer-ZlotnikJ.
H.HarknessJ. A.Zentrum
fürUmfragen. (2005). Methodological aspects in
cross-national research. Mannheim,
Germany: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und
Analysen.
JohnsonR. B.GrayR. (2010). A history of philosophical
and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. In
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and
behavioral research (2nd ed., pp.
69-94). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
42.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A
research paradigm whose time has come. Educational
Researcher, 33(7),
14-26.
43.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed
methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 1(2),
112-133.
44.
KuhnT. S. (2012). The structure of scientific
revolutions. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press. (Original work
published 1962)
45.
LorkowskiC. M. (2015). David Hume:
Causation. In Internet encyclopedia of
philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/hume-cau/
MasseyD. S. (1987). Special issue: Measuring
international migration: Theory and practice.
International Migration Review, 21,
1498-1522.
48.
MaxwellJ. A.MittapalliK. (2010). Realism as a stance for
mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and
behavioral research (2nd ed., pp.
145-168). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
49.
McKendrickJ. H. (1999). Multi-method research: An
introduction to its application in population geography.
The Professional Geographer, 51,
40-50.
50.
MertensD. M. (2013). Emerging advances in mixed
methods: Addressing social justice. Journal of Mixed
Methods Research, 7(3),
215-218.
51.
MertensD. M. (2014). A momentous development in
mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 8(1),
3-5.
52.
MertensD. M.Hesse-BiberS. (2012). Triangulation and mixed
methods research: Provocative positions. Journal of
Mixed Methods Research, 6(2),
75-79.
53.
MeyerJ. W. (2010). World society, institutional
theories, and the actor. Annual Review of
Sociology, 36,
1-20.
54.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008). The quality of mixed methods
studies in health services research. Journal of
Health Services Research & Policy,
13(2),
92-98.
55.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation
of “significant” findings: The role of mixed methods
research. Qualitative Report,
9, 770-792.
56.
PetroskiK. (2011). Is post-positivism
possible?German Law Journal, 12,
663.
57.
PettyN. J.ThomsonO. P.StewG. (2012). Ready for a paradigm shift?
Part 1: Introducing the philosophy of qualitative research.
Manual Therapy, 17,
267-274.
58.
PhilipL. (1998). Combining quantitative and
qualitative approaches to social research in human geography: An impossible
mixture?Environment and Planning A, 30,
261-276.
59.
PhillipsD. C. (1983). After the wake:
Postpositivistic educational thought. Educational
Researcher, 12(5),
4-12.
60.
PhillipsD. C.BurbulesN. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational
research. Oxford, England:
Rowman & Littlefield.
61.
Plano-ClarkV. L.SchumacherK.WestC.EdringtonJ.DunnL. B.HarzstarkA.. . .
MiaskowskiC. (2013). Practices for embedding an
interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical
trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
7(3),
219-242.
PopperK. (2002). The logic of scientific
discovery. London, England:
Routledge. (Original work published
1934)
64.
RhodesS.HarutyunyanA. (2010). Extending citizenship to
emigrants: Democratic contestation and a new global norm.
International Political Science Review,
31, 470-493.
65.
SchwandtT. A. (1994). Constructivist,
interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.
118-137). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
66.
ScotlandJ. (2012). Exploring the philosophical
underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the
methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical
research paradigms. English Language
Teaching, 5(9),
9-16.
67.
SharpL.McDonaldA.SimP.KnamillerC.SeftonC.WongS. (2011). Positivism, post-positivism
and domestic water demand: Interrelating science across the paradigmatic
divide. Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers, 36,
501-515.
68.
SheppardE. (2014). We have never been
positivist. Urban Geography,
35, 636-644.
69.
SmithN. (1979). Geography, science and
post-positivist modes of explanation. Progress in
Human Geography, 3,
356-383.
70.
TashakkoriA.CreswellJ. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of
mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 1(1),
3-7.
71.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social
and behavioral research. London,
England:
Sage.
72.
TuckerW. T. (1965). Max Weber’s
“Verstehen.”Sociological Quarterly, 6,
157-165.
73.
Van der
RoestJ.-W.SpaaijR.Van BottenburgM. (2015). Mixed methods in emerging
subdisciplines: The case of sport management.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
9(1),
70-90.
74.
YinR. (2003). Case study research: Design and
methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
