CollinsH.EvansR.WeinelM.Lyttleton-SmithJ.BartlettA.HallM. (2017). The imitation game and the nature of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 510-527.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017a). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 3-10.
4.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017b). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291-307.
5.
FrelsR. K.NewmanI.NewmanC. (2015). Mentoring the next generation in mixed methods research. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 333-353). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
GuettermanT. C. (2017). What distinguishes a novice from an expert mixed methods researcher?Quality & Quantity, 51, 377-398. doi:10.1007/s11135-016-0310-9
7.
HathcoatJ. D.MeixnerC. (2017). Pragmatism, factor analysis, and the conditional incompatibility thesis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 433-449.
8.
HesseB. W.MoserR. P.RileyW. T. (2015). From big data to knowledge in the social sciences. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political Social Science, 659(1), 16-32.
9.
HowesL. M. (2017). Developing the methodology for an applied, interdisciplinary research project: Documenting the journey toward philosophical clarity. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 45-468.
10.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
11.
MertensD. M. (2018). Mixed methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
MertensD. M.BazeleyP.BowlegL.FieldingN.MaxwellJ.Molina-AzorinJ. F.NiglasK. (2016). Expanding thinking through a kaleidoscopic look into future: Implications of the Mixed Methods International Research Association’s Task Force Report on the future of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 221-227.
13.
Molina-AzorinJ. F.FettersM. D. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The first ten years in review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 143-155.
14.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
TateR. C.HodkinsonP. W.SussmanA. L. (2017). Lessons learned from the application of mixed methods to an international study of prehospital language barriers. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 469-486.
17.
WatkinsD. C.WhartonT.MitchellJ. A.MatuskoN.KalesH. C. (2017). Perceptions and receptivity of nonspousal family support: A mixed methods study of psychological distress among older, church-going African American men. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 487-509.