This article discusses the use of mixed methods design for transnational
migration research. It draws on two currently expanding strategies that can form
part of an integrated framework that reveals multiple complementary
perspectives: (a) the incorporation of quantitative data and methods in what has
been a largely qualitative field and (b) the use of multisited research that
investigates individuals and families connected across borders. This framework
can be supported by collaboration of researchers across methodologies and state
borders, which is addressed as a third strategy. By drawing on one research
project that investigates the role of transnationality in the reproduction of
social inequalities, this article explores the benefits and challenges of this
approach.
AmannK.HirschauerS. (1997). Die Befremdung der eigenen
Kultur [Making your own culture
strange]. Frankfurt, Germany:
Suhrkamp Verlag.
2.
AmelinaA. (2010). Searching for an appropriate
research strategy on transnational migration: The logic of multi-sited
research and the advantage of the cultural interferences
approach. Forum: Qualitative Social
Research, 11(1),
17.
3.
AmelinaA.FaistT. (2012). De-naturalizing nation
states in research methodologies: Key concepts of transnational studies in
migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
35,
1707-1724.
4.
BeaucheminC.González-FerrerA. (2011). Sampling international
migrants with origin-based snowballing method: New evidence on biases and
limitations. Demographic Research,
25, 103-134.
5.
BeckU.PoferlA. (Eds.). (2010). Große Armut, großer
Reichtum: Zur Transnationalisierung sozialer Ungleichheit
[Great poverty, great wealth: On the
transnationalization of social inequalities].
Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp
Verlag.
6.
BeckU.SznaiderN. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism
for the social sciences: A research agenda. British
Journal of Sociology, 57,
1-23.
7.
BergerP. A.WeißA. (Eds.). (2008). Transnationalisierung
sozialer Ungleichheit [Transnationalization of social inequalities].
Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag
für Sozialwissenschaften.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2010). Mapping the developing
landscape of mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Mixed methods in social and behavioral
research (2nd ed., pp.
45-68). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
9.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed
methods research (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
10.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods
research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social &
behavioral research (pp. 209-240).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
11.
DahindenJ. (2009). Are we all transnationals
now? Network transnationalism and transnational subjectivity: The differing
impacts of globalization on the inhabitants of a small Swiss
city. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
32,
1365-1386.
12.
de MunckV. C. (2002). Contemporary issues and
challenges for comparativists. Anthropological
Theory, 2,
5-19.
13.
DelheyJ.DeutschmannE.GrafT.RichterK. (2014). Measuring the
Europeanization of everyday life: Three new indices and an empirical
application. European Societies,
16, 355-377.
14.
DenzinN. K. (1989). The research act
(3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice
Hall.
15.
DenzinN. K. (2012). Triangulation
2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
6(2),
80-88.
16.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline
and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K. (Ed.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research
(pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
17.
DurandJ.MasseyD. R. (2004). Crossing the border: Research from
the Mexican Migration Project. New York,
NY: Russell Sage
Foundation.
FalzonM.-A. (2009). Introduction: Multi-sited
ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary
research. In FalzonM.-A. (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and
locality in contemporary research (pp.
1-24). Aldershot,
England:
Ashgate.
20.
FauserM.LiebauE.VoigtländerS.TuncerH.FaistT.RazumO. (2015). Measuring transnationality
of immigrants in Germany: Prevalence and relationship with social
inequalities. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
38(9),
1479–1519.
21.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ.
F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed
Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing
in the new and divesting the old language of the field.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
11(1),
3-11.
22.
FitzgeraldD. (2006). Towards a theoretical
ethnography of migration. Qualitative
Sociology, 29,
1-24.
23.
FlickU. (1992). Triangulation revisited:
Strategy of validation or alternative?Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,
22, 175-197.
24.
FlickU. (2004). Triangulation: Eine
Einführung [Triangulation: An
introduction]. Wiesbaden,
Germany: VS Verlag für
Sozialwissenschaften.
25.
FlickU.Garms-HomolovaV.HerrmannW. J.KuckJ.RöhnschG. (2012). “I can’t prescribe something
just because someone asks for it . . . ”: Using mixed methods in the
framework of triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 6(2),
97-110.
26.
FonerN. (2001). Transnationalism then and
now: New York immigrants today and at the turn of the twentieth
century. In Cordero-GuzmánH.SmithR. C.GrosfoguelR. (Eds.), Migration, transnationalization, and race in a
changing New York (pp. 35-57).
Philadelphia, PA: Temple
University Press.
27.
Glick SchillerN.BaschL.Blanc-SzantonC. (Eds.). (1994). Nations unbound:
Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized
nation-states. Amsterdam,
Netherlands: Gordon and
Breach.
28.
Glick SchillerN.ÇağlarA.GuldbrandsenT. C. (2006). Beyond the ethnic lens:
Locality, globality, and born-again incorporation.
American Ethnologist, 33,
612-633.
29.
GoldringL. (1999). The power of status in
transnational social fields. In SmithM.GuarnizoL. E. (Eds.), Transnationalism from below (pp.
165-195). New Brunswick,
Canada:
Transaction.
30.
GroenewoldW.BilsborrowR. (2008). Design of samples for
international migration surveys: Methodological considerations and lessons
learned from a multi-country study in Africa and Europe. In
BonifaziC.OkólskiM.SchoorlJ.SimonP. (Eds.), International migration in Europe: New trends
and new methods of analysis (pp.
293-312). Amsterdam,
Netherlands: Amsterdam University
Press.
31.
GuarnizoL. E. (1999). Mistrust, fragmented
solidarity, and transnational migration: Colombians in New York City and Los
Angeles. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
22, 367-396.
32.
GuarnizoL. E.PortesA.HallerW. (2003). Assimilation and
transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among
contemporary migrants. American Journal of
Sociology, 108,
1211-1248.
33.
GuveliA. (2014). Are movers more religious
than stayers? Religiosity of European majority, Turks in Europe and
Turkey. Review of Religious Research,
57, 43-62. doi:10.1007/s13644-014-0174-1
34.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in
practice. London, England:
Routledge.
35.
HannerzU. (2003). Being there . . . and there
. . . and there! Reflections on multi-site ethnography.
Ethnography, 4,
201-216.
36.
Hesse-BiberS. (2012). Feminist approaches to
triangulation: Uncovering subjugated knowledge and fostering social change
in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 6(2),
137-146.
37.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging
theory with practice. New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
38.
HorvathK. (2012). National numbers for
transnational relations? Challenges of integrating quantitative methods into
research on transnational labour market relations.
Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35,
1741-1757.
39.
KuhnT. (2011). Individual transnationalism,
globalisation and euroscepticism: An empirical test of Deutsch’s
transactionalist theory. European Journal of
Political Research, 50,
811-837.
40.
LevittP. (2001). Transnational migration:
Taking stock and future directions. Global
Networks, 1,
195-216.
41.
LevittP.Glick SchillerN. (2004). Conceptualizing
simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on
society. International Migration Review,
38,
1002-1039.
42.
LouisK. S. (1982). Multisite/multimethod
studies: An introduction. American Behavioral
Scientist, 26,
6-22.
43.
MahlerS. (1999). Engendering transnational
migration: A case study of Salvadorans. American
Behavioral Scientist, 42,
690-719.
44.
MarcusG. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world
system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography.
Annual Review of Anthropology, 24,
95-117.
45.
MasseyD. S. (1987). The ethnosurvey in theory
and practice. International Migration
Review, 21,
1498-1522.
46.
MasseyD. S.ZentenoR. (2000). A validation of the
ethnosurvey: The case of Mexico-U.S. migration.
International Migration Review, 34,
766-793.
47.
MauS.MewesJ. (2012). Horizontal Europeanisation
in contextual perspective. European
Societies, 14(1),
7-34.
48.
MazzucatoV. (2008). Simultaneity and networks in
transnational migration: Lessons learned from a simultaneous matched-sample
methodology. In DeWindJ.HoldawayJ. (Eds.), Migration and development within and across
borders: Research and policy perspectives on internal and international
migration (pp. 69-100).
Geneva, Switzerland:
International Organization for
Migration.
49.
MazzucatoV. (2010). Operationalizing
transnational migrant networks through a simultaneous matched sample
methodology. In BauböckR.FaistT. (Eds.), Diaspora and transnationalism: Concepts,
theories and methods (pp. 205-226).
Amsterdam, Netherlands:
Amsterdam University
Press.
50.
MazzucatoV.SchansD. (2011). Transnational families and
the well-being of children: Conceptual and methodological
challenges. Journal of Marriage and Family,
73, 704-712.
51.
Migrations between Africa and Europe Project.
(2014). Projet MAFE: Le projet de recherche
MAFE [Project MAFE: the research
project MAFE]. Retrieved from http://mafeproject.site.ined.fr
52.
NadaiE.MaederC. (2005). Fuzzy fields. Multi-sited
ethnography in sociological research. Forum:
Qualitative Social Research, 6(3),
28.
53.
NieswandB. (2012). Theorising transnational migration:
The status paradox of migration. London,
England:
Routledge.
54.
NowickaM. (2013). Positioning strategies of
Polish entrepreneurs in Germany: Transnationalizing Bourdieu’s notion of
capital. International Sociology,
28, 29-47.
55.
ParreñasR. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women,
migration and domestic work. Stanford,
CA: Stanford University
Press.
56.
PioreM. J. (1979). Birds of passage: Migrant labor and
industrial societies. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University
Press.
57.
PortesA. (1999). Conclusion: Towards a new
world—The origins and effects of transnational activities.
Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22,
463-474.
58.
PortesA.GuarnizoL. E.HallerW. J. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs:
An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation.
American Sociological Review, 67,
278-298.
59.
PortesA.GuarnizoL. E.LandoltP. (1999). The study of
transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research
field. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
22, 217-237.
60.
PriesL. (2001). The approach of
transnational social spaces: Responding to new configurations of the social
and the spatial. In PriesL. (Ed.), New transnational social spaces: International
migration and transnational companies in the early twenty-first
century (pp. 3-33).
London, England:
Routledge.
61.
SchunckR. (2011). Immigrant integration,
transnational activities and the life course. In
WingensM.WindzioM.ValkH.AybekC. (Eds.), A life-course perspective on migration and
integration (pp. 259-282).
Heidelberg, Germany: Springer
Science+Business Media.
62.
SmithM. P. (2005). Power in place/places of
power: Contextualizing transnational research. City
& Society, 17,
5-33.
63.
SnelE.EngbergsenG.LeerkesA. (2006). Transnational involvement
and social integration. Global Networks,
6, 285-308.
64.
van BochoveM.RusinovicK.EngbergsenG. (2010). The multiplicity of
citizenship: Transnational and local practices and identifications of
middle-class migrants. Global Networks,
10, 344-364.
65.
WagnerG.FrickJ. R.SchuppJ. (2007). The German Socio-Economic
Panel Study (SOEP): Scope, evolution and enhancements.
Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127,
139-169.
66.
WaldingerR. (2008). Between “here” and “there”:
Immigrant cross-border activities and loyalties.
International Migration Review, 42,
3-29.
67.
WallaceC.VincentK. (2007). Recent migration from the
new European Borderlands. Review of
Sociology, 13,
1-15.
68.
WeißA.BergerP. (2008). Logik der Differenz—Logik
des Austauschs. In BergerP. A.BergerW. A. (Eds.), Transnationalisierung sozialer
Ungleichheit (pp. 7-15).
Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag
für Sozialwissenschaften.
69.
WimmerA.Glick SchillerN. (2002). Methodological nationalism
and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social
sciences. Global Networks,
2, 301-334.
