AliseM.TeddlieC. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103-126.
2.
BergmanM. M. (2010). On concepts and paradigms in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(3), 171-175.
3.
BrymanA. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
4.
ChristT. W. (2007). A recursive approach to mixed methods research in a longitudinal study of postsecondary education disability support services. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 226-241.
5.
ChristT. W. (2009). Designing, teaching, and evaluating two complementary mixed methods research course. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 292-325.
6.
Chui.W. H.ChengK. K. (2017). Perceptions of fairness and satisfaction in lawyer-client interactions among young offenders in Hong Kong. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 266-286.
7.
CollinsC. C.DresslerW. (2008). Cultural consensus and cultural diversity. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 362-387.
8.
CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.JiaoQ. (2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 267-294.
9.
CordenA.HirstM. (2008). Implementing a mixed methods approach to explore the financial implications of death of a life partner. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 208-220.
CreswellJ. W.TashakkoriA. (2007b). Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 303-308.
12.
CreswellJ. W.TashakkoriA. (2008). How do research manuscripts contribute to the literature on mixed methods?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 115-120.
13.
CrooksV.SchuurmanN.CinnamonJ.CastledenH.JohnstonR. (2011). Refining a location analysis model using a mixed methods approach: Community readiness as a key factor in siting rural palliative care services. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 77-95.
14.
FarmerJ.KnappD. (2008). Interpretation programs at a historic preservation site. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 340-361.
15.
FeilzerM. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.
16.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203-213.
17.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 3-10.
18.
FettersM. D.YoshiokaT.GreenbergG.GorenfloD.YeoS. (2007). Advance consent in Japanese during prenatal care for epidural anesthesia during childbirth. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 333-365.
19.
FreshwaterD. (2007). Reading mixed methods research: Context for criticism. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 134-146.
20.
FreshwaterD.CahillJ. (2012). Why write?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(3), 151-153.
21.
FreshwaterD.CahillJ. (2013). Paradigms lost and paradigms regained. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 3-5.
22.
FriesC. (2009). Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology as a theoretical basis for mixed methods research: An application to complementary and alternative medicine. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 326-348.
23.
GreeneJ.CaracelliV.GrahamW. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
24.
GuettermanT. C. (2016). Writing reviews of books and other media for theJournal of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 315-318.
25.
HartL.SmithS.SwarsS.SmithM. (2009). An examination of research methods in mathematics education (1995-2005). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 26-41.
26.
HodgkinS. (2008). Telling it all: A story of women’s social capital using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 296-316.
27.
IgoL.KiewraK.BruningR. (2008). Individual differences and intervention flaws: A sequential explanatory study of college students’ copy-and-paste note taking. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 149-168.
28.
JangE.McDougallD.PollonD.HerbertM.RussellP. (2008). Integrative mixed methods data analytic strategies in research on school success in challenging circumstances. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 221-247.
29.
JohnsonR. B. (2017). Dialectical pluralism: A metaparadigm whose time has come. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 156-173.
30.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
31.
KramerJ. M. (2011). Using mixed methods to establish the social validity of a self-report assessment: An illustration using the child occupational self-assessment (COSA). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 52-76.
32.
ManoharanC.de MunckV. (2017). The conceptual relationship between love, romantic love, and sex. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 248-265.
33.
McKimC. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202-222.
34.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225.
35.
MertensD. M. (2010). Divergence and mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 3-5.
36.
MertensD. M. (2011). Publishing mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 3-6.
37.
MertensD. M. (2012). What comes first? The paradigm or the approach?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 255-257.
38.
MertensD. M.Hesse-BiberS. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods research: Provocative positions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 75-79.
39.
Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2011). The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 7-24.
40.
Molina-AzorinJ. F.FettersM. D. (2016). Mixed methods research prevalence studies: Field-specific studies on the state of the art of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(2), 123-128.
41.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
42.
NielsenK.RandallR.ChristensenK. B. (2017). Do different training conditions facilitate team implementation?A quasi-experimental mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 223-247.
43.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2007). Integration and publications as indicators of “yield” from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147-163.
44.
OnwuegbuzieA.BustamanteR.NelsonJ. (2010). Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 56-78.
45.
SchieberA. C.Kelly-IrvingM.GenoliniJ. P.MembradoM.TanguyL.FabreC.… LangT. (2017). Integrating multidisciplinary results to produce new knowledge about the physician-patient relationship: A methodology applied to the INTERMEDE project. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 174-201.
46.
Sorde-MartiT.MertensD. M. (2014). Mixed methods research with groups at risk: New developments and key debates. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 207-211.
47.
SosulskiM.LawrenceC. (2008). Mixing methods for full-strength results: Two welfare studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 121-148.
48.
TashakkoriA.CreswellJ. W. (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 207-211.
49.
WallR.Devine-WrightP.MillG. A. (2008). Interactions between perceived behavioural control and personal-normative motives: Qualitative and quantitative evidence from a study of commuting-mode choice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 63-86.