Although investigators in health sciences are increasingly interested in using mixed methods, greater adoption requires funding opportunities. Funding allocations can signal recognition of a particular methodology and proficiency of investigators in using such methods. We examined trends in prevalence of mixed methods research funded by federal agencies in the United States. We reviewed abstracts to describe the content and terminology related to mixed methods. The number of self-identified mixed methods awards (n = 535; 2009-2014) increased modestly from previous trends (n = 226; 1997-2008). Abstracts were highly variable in their depth of description and use of mixed methods terminology. We propose five elements to address when developing a scientific abstract for a mixed methods study to facilitate clear description of study design and methods.
AndrewS.HalcombE. J. (Eds.). (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
2.
BarsevickA. M. (2009). Symptom cluster assessment and intervention trial (Grant No. 1R21NR010615-01A1). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
3.
BazeleyP. (2015). Book review: Mixed methods for policy research and program evaluation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:1558689815591663
4.
BradleyE. L. (2009). Exploring secondary abstinence in young African-American women at risk for HIV (Grant No. 1F31MH088941-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
5.
CasadoB. L. (2014). Help-seeking intentions for Alzheimer’s among Korean Americans (Grant No. 1R03HS022947-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
6.
ChaE. (2011). Diabetes prevention program for young adults with increased risk for type 2 diabetes (Grant No. 1K01NR012779-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
7.
CheekJ. (2015). It depends: Possible impacts of moving the field of mixed methods research toward best practice guidelines. In Hesse-BiberS.Burke JohnsonR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 624-636). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
CurryL.Nunez-SmithM. (2015). Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CurryL. A.KrumholzH. M.O’CathainA.Plano ClarkV. L.CherlinE.BradleyE. H. (2013). Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 6(1), 119-123.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CreswellJ. W.FettersM. D.IvankovaN. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7-12. doi:10.1370/afm.104
12.
CreswellJ. W.KlassenA. C.Plano ClarkV. L.SmithK. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from https://obssr.od.nih.gov/training/mixed-methods-research/
13.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DahlbergB.WittinkM.GalloJ. (2010). Funding and publishing integrated studies: Writing effective mixed methods manuscripts and grant proposals. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 775-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DenscombeM. (2008). Communities of practice a research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270-283. doi:10.1177/1558689808316807
16.
DumbiliE. W. (2014). Use of mixed methods designs in substance research: A methodological necessity in Nigeria. Quality & Quantity, 48, 2841-2857.
17.
DupinC. M.DeboutC.Rothan-TondeurM. (2014). Mixed-method nursing research: “A public and its problems?” A commentary on French nursing research. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 15(1-2), 15-20. doi:10.1177/1527154414538100
18.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6, Pt. 2), 2134-2156. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117
19.
FletcherF. E. (2009). Pregnancy intentions among HIV positive black women in South Carolina: A mixed methods approach (Grant No. 1R36PS001442-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
20.
FreshwaterD. (2007). Reading mixed methods research: Contexts for criticism. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 134-146.
21.
GarfeinR. (2011). Drug tourism to Mexico: Impact of Mexico’s new drug law on HIV-HCV-TB in US IDUS (Grant No. 1R01DA031074-01A1). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
22.
GuestG. (2012). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 141-151. doi:10.1177/1558689812461179
23.
HansonW. E.CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.PetskaK. S.CreswellJ. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 224-235. doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
24.
HeffronR. A. (2013). Antiretroviral periconception HIV prevention for HIV discordant couples (Grant No. 1K99HD076679-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
25.
HernandezD. (2014). Assessing the impact of clean heat policy intervention in New York City. (Grant No. 1R21ES024108-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
26.
Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (2013). Coming at things differently future directions of possible engagement with mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 103-109. doi:10.1177/1558689813483987
27.
IslamF.OremusM. (2014). Mixed methods immigrant mental health research in Canada: A systematic review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 16, 1284-1289.
28.
IvankovaK.KawamuraK. (2010). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 581-611). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43, 265-275.
30.
ManojlovichM. (2014). The effect of health information technology on healthcare provider comixed methods unification (Grant No. 1R01HS022305-01A1). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
31.
MartinezG. (2014). Integrated second language learning for chronic care: A model to improve primary care for Hispanics with diabetes (Grant No. 1R01DK104648-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
32.
Molina-AzorinJ. F.FettersM. D. (2016). Mixed methods research prevalence studies: Field-specific studies on the state of the art of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(2), 123-128.
33.
National Institutes of Health. (2014). Competing applications, awards, success rate and total funding made with direct budget authority and superfund funds by NIH institutes/centers, grant mechanisms and activity codes fiscal year 2014 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.report.nih.gov/success_rates/index.aspx
34.
NiccolaiL. (2013). Disparities in HPV vaccine completion: Identifying and quantifying the barriers (Grant No. 1R21CA163160-01A1). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
35.
O’CathainA. (2009). Editorial: Mixed methods research in the health sciences: A quiet revolution. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 3-6.
36.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2007). Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 7(1), 85. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-85
37.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008a). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(2), 92-98.
38.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008b). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1574-1585.
39.
OliverJ. S. (2011). Advocates role in prostate cancer screening decisions by rural African American (Grant No. 1R21NR012550-01A1). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
40.
ParkerE. (2014). University of Iowa prevention research center for rural health (Grant No. 1U48DP005021-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
41.
Plano ClarkV. L. (2005). Cross-disciplinary analysis of the use of mixed methods in physics education research, counseling psychology, and primary care (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 02A.
42.
Plano ClarkV. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 428-440. doi:10.1177/1077800410364609
43.
Plano ClarkV. L.Huddleston-CasasC. A.ChurchillS. L.GreenD. O.GarrettA. L. (2008). Mixed methods approaches in family science research. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1543-1566.
44.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
ReisingerH. (2014). Building an optimal hand washing bundle: A mixed methods approach (Grant No. 1I01HX001096-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
46.
RichardsL.MorseJ. M. (2007). README FIRST for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
SimonM. (2012). Adapting patient navigation to promote cancer screening in Chicago’s Chinatown (Grant No. 1R01CA163830-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
48.
StangeK. C.CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 292-294.
49.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioural sciences: U.S. perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 61-77.
50.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
TaylorL. (2009). Living donor information network for caregiving (Grant No. 1R21NR011192-01A1). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
53.
WisdomJ. P.CavaleriM. A.OnwuegbuzieA. J.GreenC. A. (2012). Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Services Research, 47, 721-745.
54.
WisdomJ. P.FettersM. D. (2015). Funding for mixed methods research. Sources and strategies. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 314-332). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
55.
WuS. (2010). Care management technology to facilitate depression care in safety net diabetes clinics (Grant No. 1R18AE000054-01). Abstract retrieved from RePORTER database.
56.
ZhouY.CreswellJ. W. (2012). The use of mixed methods by Chinese scholars in East China: A case study. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(1), 73-87.
