BetancourtT. (2015). Addressing mental health disparities in refugee children: A CBPR collaboration (NIH, NIMHD R24 Project). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
2.
BulmerM. (1984). The Chicago school of sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait, multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, I81-105.
4.
CreswellJ. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 45-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 269-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 57-71). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2016, March). Advances in mixed methods research. Paper presented at the 18th CAQD conference, Berlin, Germany.
9.
CreswellJ. W.KlassenA. C.Plano ClarkV. L.SmithK. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
10.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134-2156. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117
11.
GreenJ. C. (2015). Preserving distinctions within the multimethod and mixed methods research merger. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR.B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 606-615). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12.
GuettermanT. C. (2015). The development, design, and test of a self-assessment instrument of mixed methods research proficiency (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
13.
Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
KuckartzU. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice & using software. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
MaxwellJ. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
MertensD. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
MorseJ. M.NiehausL., (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
19.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ. H. (2016). Mixed methods research and culture-specific interventions: Program design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1574-1585.
21.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
PüschelK.ThompsonB. (2011). Mammogram screening in Chile: Using mixed methods to implement health policy planning at the primary care level. Breast, 20(Suppl. 2), S40-S45. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2011.02.002
23.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.