Attention to Individuals: Mixed Methods for N-of-1 Health Care Interventions

Abstract

In several ways, randomized controlled trials represent a high standard of rigor in clinical biomedical research. Randomized controlled trials fail, however, to yield knowledge applicable to specific individuals. This article presents a methodological rationale for a mixed methods approach to n-of-1 clinical studies that attends to the preferences and concerns of individuals while attaining high standards of qualitative and quantitative rigor. An illustrative research design involving a hypothetical music therapy intervention for a quality of life outcome is examined in some detail and a concluding argument is made that the proposed mixed methods approach is especially appropriate for early-stage research interventions intended to generate explanatory hypotheses.

Keywords

mixed methods n-of-1 study randomization tests music therapy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aickin

(2004). Separation tests for early-phase complementary and alternative medicine comparative trials. Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, 1, 225-231.

Aickin

(2007). The importance of early phase research. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13, 447-450.

American Music Therapy Association. (2005). Strategic priority on research: Overview. Retrieved from http://www.musictherapy.org/research/strategic_priority_on_research/overview

Auerbach

Zeitlin

(2014). SSD for R. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bazeley

(2009). Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 203-207.

Boutron

Tubach

Giraudeau

Ravaud

(2004). Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 1758-1772.

Bradley

E. H.

Curry

L. A.

Devers

K. J.

(2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42, 1758-1772.

Bradt

Burns

D. S.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Mixed methods research in music therapy research. Journal of Music Therapy, 50, 123-148.

Briggs

J. P.

Killen

(2013). Perspectives on complementary and alternative medicine research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310, 691-692.

10.

Bryman

(2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.

11.

Carnap

(1962). Logical foundations of probability (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Carr

d’Ardenne

Sloboda

Scott

Wang

Priebe

(2012). Group music therapy for patients with persistent post-traumatic stress disorder: An exploratory randomised controlled trial with mixed methods evaluation. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 85, 179-202.

13.

Chlan

L. L.

Heiderscheit

(2009). A tool for music preference assessment with critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support. Music Therapy Perspectives, 27, 42-47.

14.

Chlan

L. L.

Weinert

C. R.

Heiderscheit

Tracy

M. F.

Skaar

D. L.

Guttormson

J. L.

Savik

(2013). Effects of patient-directed music intervention on anxiety and sedative exposure in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 309, 2335-2344.

15.

Christensen

(2005). Testing Fisher, Neyman, Pearson, and Bayes. The American Statistician, 59, 121-126.

16.

Clair

A. A.

Memmott

(2008). Therapeutic uses of music with older adults. Silver Spring, MD: American Music Therapy Association.

17.

Clancy

Collins

F. S.

(2010). Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: The intersection of science and health care. Science Translational Medicine, 2, 37cm18.

18.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

19.

Creswell

J. W.

Klassen

A. C.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Smith

K. C.

(2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences (For the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research). Retrieved from http://obssr.od.nih.gov/mixed_methods_research/

20.

Dewey

(1991). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Original work published 1938)

21.

Duan

Eslick

Gabler

N. B.

Kaplan

H. C.

Kravitz

R. L.

Larson

E. B.

. . . Vohra

(2014). Design and implementation of n-of-1 trials: A user’s guide ( Kravitz

R. L.

Duan

, Eds.). Retrieved from http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/534/1844/n-1-trials-report-130213.pdf

22.

Duan

Kravitz

R. L.

Schmid

C. H.

(2013). Single patient (n-of-1) trials: A pragmatic clinical decision methodology for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66, S1-S28.

23.

Dugard

File

Todman

(2012). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

24.

Edgington

E. S.

Onghena

(2007). Randomization tests (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

25.

Engström

Hammar

L. M.

(2012). Humming as a potential tool for facilitating feeding situations betwen persons with dementia and their caregiver: A single case study. Music and Medicine, 4, 231-236.

26.

Fisher

R. A.

(1990). Design of experiments. In Statistical methods, experimental design, and statistical inference: A re-issue of statistical methods for research workers, the design of experiments, and statistical methods and scientific inference (pp. 11-26). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1960)

27.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

28.

Hesse-Biber

(2010). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 455-468.

29.

James

(1963a). Pragmatism and other essays. New York, NY: Washington Square Press. (Original work published 1879)

30.

James

(1963b). The will to believe. In James

(Ed.), Pragmatism and other essays (pp. 193-213). New York, NY: Washington Square Press. (Original work published 1896)

31.

Lillie

E. O.

Patay

Diamant

Issell

Topol

E. J.

Schork

N. J.

(2011). The n-of-1 clinical trial: The ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine. Personalized Medicine, 8, 161-173.

32.

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. (2013). Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: What’s in a name? (NCCAM Publication No. D347). Retrieved from http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam

33.

O’Cathain

Murphy

Nicholl

(2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. British Medical Journal, 341, c4587.

34.

PCORI. (2014). Why PCORI was created. Retrieved from http://www.pcori.org/content/why-pcori-was-created

35.

Peirce

C. S.

(1992). The probability of induction. In Houser

Kloesel

(Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1, pp. 155-169). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1878)

36.

Peirce

C. S.

(1998). Pragmatism as the logic of abduction. In Houser

Kloesel

(Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2, pp. 226-241). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1903)

37.

Peirce

C. S.

Jastrow

(1885). On small differences in sensation. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 73-83.

38.

Raglio

Bellandi

Baiardi

Gianotti

Granieri

(2012). Music therapy in frontal temporal dementia: A case report. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60, 1578-1579.

39.

Ricoeur

(1967). The symbolism of evil. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

40.

Rubin

D. B.

(1980). Randomization analysis of experimental data: The Fisher randomization test (a commentary). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 591-593.

41.

Rubin

D. B.

(2004). Basic concepts of statistical inference for causal effects in experiments and observational studies. Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.s-a-e.org.ar/ContentPages/2492390951.pdf

42.

Sackett

D. L.

Straus

S. E.

Richardson

W. S.

Rosenberg

Haynes

R. B.

(2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.

43.

Shih

W. J.

Ohman-Strickland

P. A.

Lin

(2004). Analysis of pilot and early phase studies with small samples. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 1827-1842.

44.

Sole

Mercadai-Brotons

Gallego

Riera

(2010). Contributions of music to aging adults’ quality of life. Journal of Music Therapy, 12, 264-281.

45.

Stegemann

(Ed.). (2013). Neurobiological aspects of music and music therapy. Music and Medicine, 5, 202-247.

46.

Stockdell

Amelia

E. J.

(2008). The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia Scale: Determining how much help people with dementia need at mealtime. American Journal of Nursing, 108, 46-54.

47.

Strauss

A. L.

Corbin

J. M.

(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

48.

Van Ness

P. H.

Charpentier

P. A.

E. H.

Leng

Murphy

T. E.

Tooze

J. A.

Allore

H. G.

(2010). Gerontologic biostatistics: The statistical challenges of clinical research with older study participants. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58, 1386-1392.

49.

von Mises

(1981). Probability, statistics and truth. New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1951)

50.

Wellman-Labadie

Zhou

(2010). The US Orphan Drug Act: Rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? Health Policy, 95, 216-228.

51.

Zarit

S. H.

Orrell

(2012). Editors’ introduction to the addendum to efficacy of music therapy based on cycles of sessions: A randomized controlled trial. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 264.