BernardH. R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BrannenJ.O’ConnellR.Data Analysis I: Overview of data analysis strategies. In Hesse-BieberS.JohnsonR. B., (Eds.), Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 257-274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BrewerJ.HunterA. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
BrymanA. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
5.
BrymanA. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
6.
CookT. D.ReichardtC. S. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CreswellJ. C. (2015). A Concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
9.
CurryL. A.O’CathainA. O.Plano ClarkV. L.AroniR.FettersM. D.BergD. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5-20.
10.
DamschroderL. J.HagedornH. J., (2011). A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 194-205.
11.
FestingerL.RieckenH. W.SchachterS. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
FeuchtF.MarchandG.OlafsonL. (2015). Use of concept maps to facilitate student learning in research and measurement courses. In McCruddenM. T.SchrawG.BuckendahlC. W., Use of visual displays in research and testing(pp. 207-234). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
FieldingJ. L.FieldingN. G. (2015). Emergent technologies in multimethod and mixed methods research: Incorporating GIS and CAQDAS. In Hesse-BieberS.JohnsonR. B., (Eds.), Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 561-584). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
FrantzenK. K.FettersM. D. (2015). Meta-integration for synthesizing data in a systematic mixed studies review: Insights from research on autism spectrum disorder. Quality & Quantity. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0261-6
16.
GreeneJ. C. (2015). Preserving distinctions within the multimethod and mixed methods merger. In Hesse-BieberS.JohnsonR. B., (Eds.), Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 606-615). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
18.
GreenC. A.DuanN.GibbonsR. D.HoagwoodK. E.PalinkasL. A.WisdomJ. P., (2015). Approaches to mixed methods dissemination and implementation research: methods, strengths, caveats, and opportunities. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 508-523.
19.
GuettermanT.CreswellJ. W.KuckartzU. (2015). Using joint displays and MAXQDA software to represent the results of mixed methods research. In McCruddenM.SchrawG.BuckendahlC. (Eds.), Use of visual displays in research and testing: Coding, interpreting, and reporting data (pp. 145-175). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
20.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.CreswellJ. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13, 554-561.
21.
IoannidisJ. P. (2015). Is it possible to recognize a major scientific discovery?JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 314, 1135-1137.
22.
JahodaM.LazarsfeldP. F.ZeiselH. (1971). Marienthal: The sociography of an unemployed community. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
23.
JickT. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
24.
JohnsonR. B. (2015). Conclusions: Toward an inclusive and defensible multimethod and mixed methods science. In Hesse-BieberS.JohnsonR. B., (Eds.) Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 688-706). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
JohnsonB.ChristensenL. (2000). Educational research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allen & Bacon.
26.
KelleU.ErzbergerC. (1999). Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden: methothodologische Modelle und ihre Bedeutung für die Forschungspraxis [Integration of qualitative and quantitative methods: Methodological models and the their implications for research practice]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 51, 509-531.
27.
LeemanJ.VoilsC. I.SandelowskiM. (2015). Conducting mixed methods literature reviews: Synthesizing the evidence needed to develop and implement complex social and health interventions. In Hesse-BieberS.JohnsonR. B., (Eds.), Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 167-184). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
MaxwellJ. A. (2016). Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10, 12-27.
29.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
30.
MillerW. L.CrabtreeB. F. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L. (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: Vol. 3. Research methods for primary care (pp. 3-28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
MorseJ. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Methodology Corner, 40, 120-123.
32.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.HitchcockJ. H. (2015). Advanced mixed analysis approaches. In Hesse-BieberS.JohnsonR. B., (Eds.), Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 275-295). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Plano ClarkV. L.SandersK. (2015). The use of visual displays in mixed methods research. In McCruddenM. T.SchrawG.BuckendahlC. W., Use of visual displays in research and testing (pp. 177-206). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
34.
PeltoP. J. (2015). What is so new about mixed methods?Qualitative Health Research, 25, 734-745.
35.
RamloS. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10, 28-45.
36.
RossmanG. B.WilsonB. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
37.
SandelowskiM. (2014). Unmixing mixed-methods research. Research in Nursing and Health, 37, 3-8.
38.
SzostakR. (2015). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary multimethod and mixed methods research. In Hesse-BieberS.JohnsonR. B., (Eds.), Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 128-143). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
TeddlieC.JohnsonR. B. (2009). Methodological thought since the 20th century. In TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (Eds.), Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 62-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
WisdomJ. P.FettersM. D. (2015). Funding for mixed methods research: Sources and strategies. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 314-332). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.