BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
2.
BeckU.GiddensA.LashS. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
3.
BurawoyM. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4-28.
4.
ChilisaB. (2011). Indigenous research methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Flecha Fernández de SanmamedA.Ruiz EugenioL.VrecerN. (2013). La alfabetización en salud y el empoderamiento de las comunidades. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, XVII, 427(5).
7.
FreshwaterD. (2012). Managing movement, leading change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 3-4.
8.
GómezA.PuigvertL.FlechaR. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 235-245.
9.
HabermasJ. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
10.
HarrisR.HolmesH.MertensD.M. (2009). Research ethics in sign language communities. Sign Language Studies, 9(2), 104-131.
11.
HearnJ.NovikovaI.PringleK.ŠmídováI.JyrkinenM.IovanniL.
. . . WojtaszekM. M. (2012). Studying men’s violences: Some key methodological in developing a European research framework. Principles, Masculinities and Social Change, 2(1), 82-115.
MertensD. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford.
14.
MertensD. M. (2011). Mixed methods as tools for social change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 195-197.
15.
MertensD. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
MertensD. M.Hesse-BiberS. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods research: Provocative positions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 75-79.
17.
MertensD. M.WilsonA. T. (2012). Program evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
MertonR. K.NisbetR. A. (1966). Contemporary social problems (2d ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & World.
19.
PuigvertL. (2012). The dialogic turn: Dialogue or violence?International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 78-96.
20.
PuigvertL.ChristouM.HolfordJ. (2012). Critical communicative methodology: Including vulnerable voices in research through dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 513-526.
21.
SandelowskiM. (2014). Unmixing mixed-methods research. Research in Nursing & Health, 37, 3-8.
22.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books.
23.
TashakkoriA.CreswellJ. W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7.