Overcoming Barriers to College Enrollment,Persistence,and Perceptions for Urban High School Students in a College Preparatory Program

Abstract

Although research shows college preparatory programs’ effectiveness regarding academic achievement and college awareness, much less is known about whether programs affect college attendance and persistence. GEAR UP (Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs) and other college preparatory programs claim that this is a primary outcome, yet very few studies on persistence in higher education have been done. Through the use of an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, our study found that significantly more students (including low-socioeconomic background) from a GEAR UP college preparatory program showed greater college attendance and persistence outcomes over those who did not participate and also provides potential explanations why this may be the case. Mixing quantitative and qualitative data allowed for meta-inferences about the isolation of poverty, goal setting, resilience, and program impacts on minorities to be drawn.

Keywords

GEAR UP college access college enrollment college persistence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACT. (2007). Using Explore^® and Plan^® data to evaluate GEAR UP programs. Iowa City: Author. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/gearup_report.pdf

Adelman

(2007). Do we really have a college access problem? Change, 39(4), 48-51.

Allen

Robbins

(2008). Prediction of college major persistence based on vocational interests, academic preparation, and first-year academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 49, 62-79.

Baum

Payea

(2010). Education pays 2010: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Washington, DC: College Board. Retrieved from http://trends.collegeboard.org/education_pays

Bean

J. P.

(1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155-187.

Cabrera

A. F.

Deil-Amen

Prabhu

Terenzini

P. T.

Lee

Franklin

R. E.

Jr. (2006). Increasing the college preparedness of at-risk students. Journal of Latinos and Education, 5, 79-97.

Carnevale

A. P.

Smith

Strohl

(2010). Help wanted: Projections of jobs and education requirements through 2018. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved from http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/FullReport.pdf

Christie

Munro

Fisher

(2004). Leaving university early: Exploring the differences between continuing and non-continuing students. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 616-636.

Cook

Campbell

(1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

10.

Corrigan

M. E.

(2003). Beyond access: Persistence challenges and the diversity of low-income students. New Directions for Higher Education, 121, 25-34.

11.

Creswell

(2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

12.

Crowley

Hauser

(2007). Evaluating whole school improvement models: Creating meaningful and reasonable standards for review. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 37-58.

13.

Farmer-Hinton

(2006). On becoming college prep: Examining the challenges charter school staff members face while executing a school’s mission. Teachers College Record, 108, 1214-1240.

14.

Fashola

O. S.

Slavin

R. E.

(1998). Effective dropout prevention and college attendance programs for students placed at risk. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 3, 159-183.

15.

Fischer

J. M.

Hamer

Zimmerman

Sidorkin

Samel

Long

McArthur

(2004). The unlikely faces of professional development in urban schools: Preparing at-risk students and colleges for one another. Educational Horizons, 82, 203-212.

16.

Gibson

D. M.

Jefferson

R. N.

(2006). The effect of perceived parental involvement and the use of growth-fostering relationships on self-concept in adolescents participating in GEAR UP. Adolescence, 41, 111-125.

17.

Gladieux

L. E.

Swail

W. S.

(1998). Financial aid is not enough: Improving the odds of college success. College Board Review, 185, 16-21.

18.

Greene

J. P.

Forster

(2003). Public high school graduation and college readiness rates in the United States. New York, NY: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www3.northern.edu/rc/pages/Reading_Clinic/highschool_graduation.pdf

19.

Griffin

K. K.

Allen

W. R.

Kimura-Walsh

Yamamura

E. K.

(2001). Those who left, those who stayed: Exploring the educational opportunities of high-achieving Black and Latina/o students at magnet and non-magnet Los Angeles high schools. Educational Studies, 42, 229-247.

20.

Kezar

(2001). Early intervention: Beyond getting kids into college. Education Digest, 66, 54-59.

21.

Kreysa

P. G.

(2006). The impact of remediation on persistence of under-prepared college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 8, 251-270.

22.

Lessard

Fortin

Marcotte

Potvin

Royer

(2009). Why did they not drop out? Narratives from resilient students. Prevention Researcher, 16(3), 21-24.

23.

Levin

J. S.

(2008). Institutional efforts to address disadvantaged students: An “up-so-down” view. New Directions for Community Colleges, 144, 93-103.

24.

Loza

P. P.

(2003). A system at risk: College outreach programs and the educational neglect of underachieving Latino high school students. Urban Review, 35, 43-57.

25.

Lozano

Watt

K. M.

Huerta

(2009). A comparison study of 12th grade Hispanic students’ college anticipations, aspirations, and college preparatory measures. American Secondary Education, 38, 92-110.

26.

Luthar

S. S.

Cicchet

Becker

(2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 3, 543-562.

27.

Martinez

Klopott

(2003). Improving college access for minority, low-income, and first-generation students. Washington, DC: Pathways to College Network Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://www.pathwaystocollege.net/pdf/ImprovingCollegeAccess.pdf

28.

Matthews

(2010). A stronger nation through higher education: How and why Americans must achieve a “big goal” for college attainment. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education. Retrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/A_stronger_nation.pdf

29.

Merriam

S. B.

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

30.

National Student Clearinghouse. (2011). What’s in the clearinghouse database? Retrieved from http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/gls/how.htm

31.

O’Cathain

Murphy

Nicholl

(2007). Integration and publications as indicators of “yield” from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147-163.

32.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Collins

K. M.

(2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12, 281-316.

33.

Perna

L. W.

(2005). The benefits of higher education: Sex, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic group differences. Review of Higher Education, 29, 23-52.

34.

Riley

R. W.

(1998). It’s time to “GEAR UP” for college! Schools in the Middle, 8, 39-41.

35.

Samel

A. N.

Sondergeld

T. A.

Fischer

J. M.

Patterson

N. C.

(2011). The secondary school pipeline: Longitudinal indicators of resilience and resistance in urban schools under reform. High School Journal, 94(3), 95-118.

36.

Sandler

M. E.

(2000). Career decision-making self-efficacy, perceived stress, and an integrated model of student persistence: A structural model of finances,attitudes, behavior, and career development. Research in Higher Education, 41, 537-580.

37.

Smith

Johnson

R. E.

(2003). To attend or not to attend: Guiding all students in the right direction. Journal of College Admission, 45(7), 2-5.

38.

Sondergeld

T. A.

Koskey

K. L.

(2011). Evaluating the impact of an urban comprehensive school reform: An illustration of the need for mixed methods. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 94-107.

39.

Swail

W. S.

(2000). Preparing America’s disadvantaged for college: Programs that increase college opportunity. New Directions for Institutional Research, 107, 85-101.

40.

Teddlie

Tashakkori

(2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

41.

Terenzini

P. T.

Cabrera

A. F.

Deil-Amen

Lambert

(2005). The dream deferred: Increasing the college preparedness of at-risk students (Year 4: Final Report, Grant No. R305T010167). Retrieved from http://inpathways.net/dream_deferred_final.pdf

42.

Tinto

(1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.

43.

U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Executive summary of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html

44.

U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Gaining early awareness and readiness for undergraduate programs (GEAR UP). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/gearup/index.html

45.

Ward

N. L.

(2006). Improving equity and access for low-income and minority youth into institutions of higher education. Urban Education, 41, 50-70.

46.

Watt

K. M.

Huerta

Lozano

(2007). A comparison study of AVID and GEAR UP 10th grade students in two high schools in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 185-212.

47.

Weiher

G. R.

Hughes

Kaplan

Howard

J. Y.

(2006). Hispanic college attendance and the state of Texas GEAR UP program. Review of Policy Research, 23, 1035-1051.

48.

Wolf

J. P.

(2007). Sociological theories of poverty in urban America. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 16, 41-56.

49.

Yampolskaya

Massey

O. T.

Greenbaum

P. E.

(2006). At-risk high school students in the “Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness Program” (GEAR UP): Academic and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 457-475.

50.

Yorke

(2000). The quality of the student experience: What can institutions learn from data relating to non-completion? Quality in Higher Education, 6, 61-75.