The embedded approach is a mixed methods design that is most commonly used when qualitative methods are embedded within intervention designs such as randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Scholars have noted challenges associated with embedded procedures and expressed concern that embedded designs undervalue and underutilize interpretive qualitative approaches. This article examines these issues in the context of a study about cancer pain management where qualitative methods were embedded within an RCT design. We describe our practices for stating embedded research questions, designing embedded qualitative data collection within the constraints of the RCT, and developing enriched understandings of the RCT through an interpretive qualitative analysis. These practices provide guidance for intervention researchers planning to embed qualitative components within RCT designs.
BazeleyP. (2010). Review of book The mixed methods reader, Plano ClarkV. L.CreswellJ. W. (Eds.). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 79-81.
2.
BradyB.O’ReganC. (2009). Meeting the challenge of doing an RCT evaluation of youth mentoring in Ireland: A journey in mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 265-280.
3.
CaracelliV. J.GreeneJ. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J. (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 19-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
ChenH. (1997). Applying mixed methods under the framework of theory-driven evaluations. In GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J. (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 61-72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
ChristT. W.MakaraniS. A. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes about teaching English in India: An embedded mixed methods study. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 73-87.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CreswellJ. W.FettersM. D.Plano ClarkV. L.MoralesA. (2009). Mixed methods intervention trials. In AndrewS.HalcombL. (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences (pp. 161-180). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
9.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM.HansonW. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CreswellJ. W.ShopeR.Plano ClarkV. L.GreenD. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11.
13.
CreswellJ. W.ZhangW. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22, 612-621.
14.
DonovanJ.MillsN.SmithM.BrindleL.JacobyA.PetersT.. . . HamdyF. (2002). Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment) study. British Medical Journal, 325, 766-769.
15.
FlemmingK.AdamsonJ.AtkinK. (2008). Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: The potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials. Palliative Medicine, 22, 123-131.
16.
GiddingsL. S. (2006). Mixed-methods research: Positivism dressed in drag?Journal of Research in Nursing, 11, 195-203.
17.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
HoweK. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42-61.
KaptchukT. J.ShawJ.KerrC. E.ConboyL. A.KelleyJ. M.CsordasT. J.. . . JacobsonE. E. (2009). “Maybe I made up the whole thing”: Placebos and patients’ experiences in a randomized controlled trial. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 33, 382-411.
21.
LipmanE. L.KennyM.JackS.CameronR.SecordM.ByrneC. (2010). Understanding how education/support groups help lone mothers. BMC Public Health, 10(4), 4-12.
22.
MaxwellJ. A.LoomisD. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 241-271). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
MiaskowskiC. (2007-2012). Improving cancer pain management through self-care. Unpublished proposal for a study funded by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Nursing Research (5R01CA116423).
24.
MiaskowskiC.DoddM.WestC.PaulS. M.SchumacherK.TripathyD.KooP. (2007). The use of a responder analysis to identify differences in patient outcomes following a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. Pain, 129, 55-63.
25.
MiaskowskiC.DoddM. J.WestC.SchumacherK.PaulS. M.TripathyD.KooP. (2004). Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 1713-1720.
26.
MillerW. L.CrabtreeB. F. (2005). Clinical research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 605-639). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
MorseJ. M.NiehausL. (2009). Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
28.
NastasiB. K.SchensulS. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 177-195.
29.
NeumanW. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
30.
Plano ClarkV. L.CreswellJ. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
SaldañaJ. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
32.
SandelowskiM. (1996). Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 19, 359-364.
33.
SchumacherK. L.KoresawaS.WestC.DoddM. J.PaulS. M.TripathyD.. . . MiaskowskiC. (2002). The usefulness of a daily pain management diary for oncology outpatients with cancer related pain. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29, 1304-1313.
34.
SchumacherK. L.KoresawaS.WestC.DoddM.PaulS. M.TripathyD.. . . MiaskowskiC. (2005). Qualitative research contribution to a randomized clinical trial. Research in Nursing & Health, 28, 268-280.
35.
SchumacherK. L.KoresawaS.WestC.HawkinsC.JohnsonC.WaisE.. . . MiaskowskiC. (2002a). Pain management autobiographies and reluctance to use opioids for cancer pain management. Cancer Nursing, 25, 125-133.
36.
SchumacherK. L.KoresawaS.WestC.HawkinsC.JohnsonC.WaisE.. . . MiaskowskiC. (2002b). Putting cancer pain management regimens into practice at home. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 23, 369-382.
37.
SongM.SandelowskiM.HappM. B. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in conducting mixed methods intervention studies in the health sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 725-747). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Turner-CobbJ. M.PalmerJ.AronsonD.RussellL.PurnellS.OsbornM.JessopD. S. (2010). Diurnal cortisol and coping responses in close relatives of persons with acquired brain injury: A longitudinal mixed methods study. Brain Injury, 24, 893-903.
40.
WestC. M.DoddM. J.PaulS. M.SchumacherK.TripathyD.KooP.MiaskowskiC. (2003). The PRO-SELF Pain Control Program—An effective approach for cancer pain management. Oncology Nursing Forum, 30, 65-73.
41.
YinR. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel?Research in the Schools, 13(1), 41-47.
