What Comes First? The Paradigm or the Approach?

Biesta G. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In Tashakkori A. Teddlie C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 95-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Denzin N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88.

Freshwater D. Cahill J. (2012). Why write? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(3), 151-153.

Greene J. Hall J. (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In Tashakkori A. Teddlie C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 119-143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Guba E. Lincoln Y. S. (1989). Fourth paradigm evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Guba E. Lincoln Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluence. In Denzin N. K. Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Johnson B. Gray R. (2010). A history of philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. In Tashakkori A. Teddlie C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 69-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Johnson R. B. Onwuegbuzie A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research, 33(7), 14-26.

Kuhn T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Mertens D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Mertens D. M. Bledsoe K. L. Sullivan M. Wilson A. (2010). Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes. In Tashakkori A. Teddlie C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 193-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mertens D. M. Wilson A. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.