A mixed method design was used to conduct a content analysis of the mission statements of colleges of engineering to map inductively derived codes with the EC 2000 outcomes and to test if any of the codes were significantly associated with institutions with reasonably strong representation of women. Most institution’s (25 of 48) mission statement had two or fewer of the outcomes endorsed by the accrediting agency. The diversity code was significantly related to the representation of women, but is not one of the outcomes identified by the accrediting agency. The research demonstrates how mixed methods can be applied to content analysis.
American Society of Engineering Education. (2010). Engineering college profiles and statistics. Retrieved from http://asee.org/publications/profiles
2.
ABET. (2003). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Engineering Accreditation Commission. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/criteria_eac.html
3.
CreamerE. G. (2011, October). Representation of women and perceptions of support in engineering. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD.
4.
CreamerE. G. (2012). Effects of the numeric representation of women on interest in engineering as a career. American Journal of Engineering Education, 3(1), 1-11.
5.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
DelucchiM. (1997). “Liberal arts” colleges and the myth of uniqueness. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 414-426.
7.
FelderR.FelderG.MauneyM.HamrinC.DietzJ. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering performance and retention: Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 151-163.
8.
FirminM. W.GilsonK. M. (2010). Mission statement analysis of CCCU member institutions. Christian Higher Education, 9, 60-70.
9.
GibbonsM. T. (2011). Engineering by the numbers: 2009 profiles in engineering overview. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org
10.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nursing Education Today, 24, 105-112.
11.
HsiehH.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.
12.
JamesH.HuismanJ. (2009). Mission statements in Wales: the impact of markets and policy on congruence between institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 23-35.
13.
KibuukaH. E. (2001). Vision and mission statements in Christian higher educational management in Eastern Africa. Journal of Research in Christian Education, 10, 87-114.
14.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 139-175.
16.
LattucaL. R.TerenziniP. T.VolkweinJ. F. (2006). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC200 (Final Report). Baltimore, MD: ABET.
17.
LundquistA.RiceJ. K. (1991). The mission statements of women’s colleges and coeducational colleges with women’s studies programs: Similarities and differences. Initiatives, 53, 9-18.
18.
MorphewC. C.HartleyM. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 456-471.
19.
The National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century (EC 2000). Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
20.
RobinsonD. A. G.ReillyB. A. (2003). Women engineers: A study of educational preparation and professional success. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2), 78-82.
21.
SandelowskiM. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 230-240.
22.
SandelowskiM.VoilsC. I.KnaflG. (2009). On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 208-223.
23.
StearnsJ. M.BornaS. (1998). Mission statements in business higher education: Issues and evidence. Higher Education Management, 10(1), 89-104.
24.
WaltonJ. (2005). Would the real corporate university please stand up?Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 7-20.
25.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
