This article uses data from 65 teachers participating in a K-2 mathematics professional development research project as an example of how to analyze video recordings of teachers’ classroom lessons using mixed methods. Through their discussion, the authors demonstrate how using a mixed methods approach to classroom video analysis allows researchers to draw more comprehensive conclusions about participants both collectively and individually. Implications for using a mixed methods approach to analyze classroom video research are provided.
BottorffJ. L. (1994). Using videotaped recordings in qualitative research. In MorseJ. M. (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 244-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
ClementJ. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In KellyA. E.LeshR. (Eds.), Handbook of research data design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547-589). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CobbP.WhitenackJ. W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analysis of classroom videorecordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 213-228.
5.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.MarshallP.L.McCullochA.W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136-155.
7.
DewaltK. M.DewaltB. R. (2002). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
8.
EricksonF. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In GreenJ.CamilliG.ElmoreP.SkukauskaiteA.GraceE. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11.
GoldmanR.PeaR.BarronB.DerryS. J. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
13.
HallR. (2000). Videorecording as theory. In KellyA. E.LeshR. (Eds.), Handbook of research data design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647-664). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
JacobsJ. K.KawanakaT.StiglerJ. W. (1999). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 717-724.
15.
JickT. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
16.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
17.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34, 159-165.
18.
LeshR.LehrerR. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In KellyA. E.LeshR. (Eds.), Handbook of research data design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665-708). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
PirieS. E. B. (1996). Classroom video-recording: When, why and how does it offer a valuable data source for qualitative research?Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Florida State University, Panama City.
21.
PowellA. B.FranciscoJ. M.MaherC. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405-435.
22.
RoschelleJ. (2000). Choosing and using video equipment for data collection. In KellyA. E.LeshR. (Eds.), Handbook of research data design in mathematics and science education (pp. 709-731). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
RossmanG. B.WilsonB. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
24.
RossmanG. B.WilsonB. L. (1994). Number and words revisited: Being shamelessly eclectic. Quality & Quantity, 28, 315-327.
25.
SimonM. A.TzurR.HeinzK.KinzelM.SmithM. S. (2000). Characterizing a perspective underlying the practice of mathematics teachers in transition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 579-601.
26.
StiglerJ. W.GonzalesP.KawanakaT.KnollS.SerranoA. (1999). The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
27.
TashakkoriA.CreswellJ. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7.
28.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
VrkljanB. H. (2009). Constructing a mixed methods design to explore the older driver copilot relationship. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 371-385.
