The Effective Classroom Practice project aimed to identify key factors that contribute to effective teaching in primary and secondary phases of schooling in different socioeconomic contexts. This article addresses the ways in which qualitative and quantitative approaches were combined within an integrated design to provide a comprehensive methodology for the research purposes. Strategies for the study are discussed, followed by the challenges of combining complex statistics with individual stories, particularly in relation to the ongoing iteration between these different data sets, and issues of validity and reliability. The findings shed new light on the meanings and measurement of teachers’ effective classroom practice and the complex nature of, and relationships with, professional life phase, teacher identities, and school context.
Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. ( 2007). Towards an articulation of expert classroom practice . Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1127-1138.
2.
Bazeley, P. ( 2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
British Education Research Association. (2004 ). Revised ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved from www.bera.ac.uk/files/guidelines/ethica1.pdf
4.
Berliner, D. ( 1992). Exemplary performances: Studies of expertise in teaching . Greenwich, CT: National Art Education Association.
5.
Bryman, A. ( 2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 1-18.
6.
Butt, R., Raymond, D., McCue, G., & Yamagishi, L. ( 1992). Collaborative autobiography and the teacher’s voice . In I. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 51-98). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
Calderhead, J. ( 1986). A cognitive perspective on teaching skills. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Education Section Annual Conference, Nottingham, England.
8.
Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Robinson, W. ( 2004). Assessing teacher effectiveness: Developing a differentiated model. London, England: Routledge Falmer.
9.
Campbell, R.J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R.D., & Robinson, W. ( 2003). Differential teacher effectiveness: Towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education , 29, 347-362.
10.
Caracelli, V.J., & Greene, J.C. ( 1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 19-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Creemers, B.P.M. ( 1994). The effective classroom. London, England: Cassell.
12.
Creemers, B.P.M., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modeling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 347-366.
13.
Creemers, B.P.M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London, England: Routledge .
14.
Creemers, B.P.M., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). Using the dynamic model to develop an evidence-based and theory-driven approach to school improvement . Irish Educational Studies, 29, 5-23.
15.
Creswell, J.W. ( 2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
Day, C.W., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Gu, Q., & Stobart, G. ( 2006a). Methodological synergy in a national project: The VITAE story. Evaluation and Research in Education, 19(2), 102-125.
17.
Day, C.W., Sammons, P., & Gu, Q. ( 2008b). Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies in research on teachers’ lives, work, and effectiveness: From integration to synergy. Educational Researcher, 37(6), 330-342.
18.
Day, C.W., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Regan, E., Ko, J., Brown, E., Gunraj, J., & Robertson. ( 2008a). Effective classroom practice (ECP): A mixed-method study of influences and outcomes. End of Award Report submitted to the Economic and Social Research Council, Reference No. RES-000-23-1564.
Day, C.W., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., & Kington, A. ( 2006b). Variations in the work and lives of teachers: Relative and relational effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(2), 169-192.
21.
Day, C.W., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Smees, R., & Mujtaba, T. ( 2006c). Variations in teachers’ works, lives, and effectiveness. Final report for the VITAE Project. DfES: London.
22.
Denzin, N.K. ( 1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: Praeger.
23.
Elliott, J. ( 2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. ( 2003). A manual for repertory grid technique. West Sussex, England: John Wiley.
25.
Galton, M., Simon, B., & Croll, P. ( 1980). Inside the primary classroom. London , England: Routledge.
26.
Gudmundsdottir, S. ( 2001). Narrative research on school practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Fourth handbook for research on teaching (pp. 226-240). New York, NY: Macmillan.
27.
Hammersley, M. ( 1990). What’s wrong with ethnography? The myth of theoretical description. Sociology, 24, 597-615.
28.
Ingvarson, L., & Rowe, K. ( 2008). Conceptualizing and evaluating teacher quality: Substantive and methodological issues. Australian Journal of Education , 52, 5-35.
29.
Jankowicz, D. ( 2004). The easy guide to repertory grids. West Sussex, England: John Wiley.
30.
Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher , 33, 14-26.
31.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. ( 1996). Models of teaching (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
Kyriakides, L. ( 2005). Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 103-152.
34.
Leech, N.L., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & quantity. International Journal of Methodology,43, 265-275.
35.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. ( 2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
Maxwell, J.A., & Loomis, D.M. ( 2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Taskakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 214-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
McBer, H. ( 2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness (Report to the Department for Education and Employment). London, England: DCSF.
38.
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. ( 1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
Mortimore, P. ( 1994). School effectiveness and the management of effective learning and teaching, School Effectiveness and School Improvement , 4, 290-310.
40.
Muijs, D., Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., & Robinson, W. ( 2005). Making the case for differentiated teacher effectiveness: An overview of research in four key areas. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 51-70.
41.
Muijs, R.D., & Reynolds, D. ( 2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the Mathematics Enhancement Programme . School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 273-303.
42.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. ( 2005). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London, England: SAGE.
43.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Johnson, R.B. ( 2004). Mixed research. In R. B. Johnson & L. B. Christensen (Eds.), Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed., pp. 408-431). Need-ham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
Opdenakker, M.C., & Van Damme, J. ( 2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1-21.
45.
Pianta, R.C., & Hamre, B.K. ( 2009). A lot of students and their teachers need support: Using a common framework to observe teacher practices might help. Educational Researcher, 38, 546-548.
46.
Polk, J.A. ( 2006). Traits of effective teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107, 23-29.
47.
Polkinghorne, D.E. ( 1988). Narrative knowing and human sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.
48.
Sammons, P. ( 2010). The contribution of mixed methods to recent research on educational effectiveness. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
49.
Sammons, P., Day, C.W., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Stobart, G., & Smees, R. ( 2007). Exploring variations in teachers’ work, lives, and their effects on pupils: Key findings and implications from a longitudinal mixed methods study. British Educational Research Journal , 33(5), 681-701.
50.
Sammons, P., Elliot, K., Wellcome, W., Taggart, B., & Levacic, R. ( 2004). England: A country report. In Hans Doöbert, Eckhard Klieme, & Wendelin Sroka (Eds.), Conditions of school performance in seven countries - A quest for understanding the international variation of PISA results (pp. 65-149). Berlin: Waxmann Publishing Co.
51.
Sammons, P., & Ko, J. ( 2008). Using systematic classroom observation schedules to investigate effective teaching: Overview of quantitative findings, effective classroom practice (ECP). ESRC project report, Ref. no. RES-000-23-1564.
52.
Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Barreau, S., & Grabbe, Y. ( 2008). Effective pre-school and primary education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11): The influence of school and teaching quality on children’s progress in primary school, research report DCSF-RR028. Institute of Education, University of London. ISBN 978 1 84775 122 5.
53.
Scheerens, J. ( 1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London, England: Cassell.
54.
Shulman, L.S. ( 1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform . Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
55.
Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., & Melhuish, E. ( 2008). Towards the transformation of practice in early childhood education: The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project . Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), March, 23-36.
56.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.
57.
Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (Eds.) (2010). Early Childhood Matters: Evidence from the Effective Pre-school and Primary Education Project. Routledge: Oxford.
58.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. ( 1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
59.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social &behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social &behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Yu, F. ( 2006). The International System for Teacher Observation and Feedback: Evolution of an international study of teacher effectiveness constructs . Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 561-582.
62.
Teddlie, C., & Liu, S. ( 2008). Examining teacher effectiveness within differentially effective primary schools in the People’s Republic of China. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 387-407.
63.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.). (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 55-133). London, England: Falmer Press.
64.
Teddlie, C., & Sammons, P. ( 2010). Applications of mixed methods to the field of educational effectiveness research. In B. P. M Creemers , L. Kyriakides, & P., Sammons (Eds.), Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research. London: Routledge.
65.
van de Grift, W., Matthews, P., Tabak, L., & de Rijcke, F. ( 2004). Comparative research into the inspection of teaching in England and the Netherlands (HMI 2251). London, England: Ofsted.
66.
Wragg, E. C. (Ed.). (1984). Classroom teaching skills. London, England: Croom Helm.
