Research of websites with information about medicines has not previously taken sufficient account of the design aspects that may affect user’s interacting with the site. This explanatory study combined four concurrent usability methods (user testing, think aloud protocol, observation, and tracking the participant’s online actions), with a sequential interview to examine five websites. Site design and content were found to obstruct participants’ attempts to locate specific information on the web pages. Draft evidence-based design recommendations were derived which, if implemented, could improve the usability of the websites and the readability of their content. Combining concurrent and sequential methods is probably a novel approach for mixed methods and provides a good base on which future mixed methods could be based.
Adams, S.A. ( 2006). Under construction: Reviewing and producing information reliability on the web. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus University.
2.
Alpay, L.L., Toussaint, P.J., Ezendam, N.P.M., Rövekamp, T.A.J.M., Graafmans, W.C., & Westendorp, R.G.J. (2004). Easing Internet access of health information for elderly users. Health Informatics Journal, 10, 185-194.
Anonymous. (2005). User testing of PILs now mandatory. Pharmaceutical Journal, 275, 675-812.
5.
Bessell, T.L., McDonald, S., Silagy, C.A., Anderson, J.N., Hiller, J.E., & Sansom, L.N. ( 2002). Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expectations , 5, 28-37.
6.
Blenkinsopp, J. ( 2005). Linking POM to P to PIL: The UK agenda for the EU self-care revolution. Regulatory Rapporteur,2, 2-5.
7.
Council Directive. (1992). On the labelling of medicinal products for human use and on package leaflets . European Community, 92/27/EEC of 31 March 1992.
8.
Creswell, J.W. ( 2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
9.
Dickinson, D., & Raynor, D.K. ( 2003). Ask the patients: They may want to know more than you think. British Medical Journal, 327, 861-864.
10.
Doupi, P., & van der Lei, J. (1999). Rx medication information for the public and the WWW: quality issues. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 24, 171-179.
11.
European Commission. (2001). Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Official Journal L311, 67-128.
12.
European Commission. (2004). Directive 2004/27/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Union, L136/34, 34-57.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. ( 1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. ( 1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 178-186.
16.
Horsky, J., Kaufman, D.R., Oppenheim, M.I., & Patel, V.L. ( 2003). A framework for analyzing the cognitive complexity of computer-assisted clinical ordering. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36, 4-22.
17.
Jaspers, M.W., Steen, T., van den Bos, C. & Geenen, M. ( 2004). The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design . Int J Med Inform73, 781-95.
18.
Kaufman, D.R., Patel, V.L., Hilliman, C., Morin, P.C., Pevzner, J., Weinstock, R.S., . . . Starren, J. ( 2003). Usability in the real world: Assessing medical information technologies in patients’ homes. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36, 45-60.
19.
McCaw, B., McGlade, K., & McElnay, J. ( 2007). The impact of the internet on the practice of general practitioners and community pharmacists in Northern Ireland. Informatics in Primary Care, 15, 231-237.
20.
Nicolson, D.J. ( 2007). Why we need to study websites that provide information about medicines. Pharmaceutical Journal,279, 124.
21.
Nicolson, D.J., Carrigan, N., Knapp, P., & Raynor, D.K. ( 2006, September). Comparing the quality, content and design of Internet-based medicines information sites. Paper presented at the EACH International Conference on Communication in Healthcare , Basel, Switzerland.
22.
Nicolson, D., Knapp, P., Raynor, D.K., & Spoor, P. ( 2009). Written information about individual medicines for consumers . Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD002104. doi:10.1002/ 14651858.CD002104.pub3
23.
Nielsen, J. ( 1993). Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
Peterson-Clark, G., Aslani, P., & Williams, K.A. (2004). Consumer use of the internet for medicines information. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 12, 185-190.
25.
Peterson, G., Aslani, P., & Williams, K.A. (2003). How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the internet? A qualitative study using focus groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research,5, e33.
26.
Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. ( 2002). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction . Chichester, England: John Wiley .
27.
Raynor, D.K. ( 2005). Testing, testing. User testing and how it will revolutionise how we think about patient information. PIPA Newsletter, 86, 4-5.
28.
Raynor, D.K. ( 2007). Practice chairman’s address: to be or not to be taken? That is the question. Pharmaceutical Journal , 279, B19-21.
29.
Raynor, D.K., Blenkinsopp, A., Knapp, P., Grime, J., Nicolson, D.J., Pollock, K., . . . Spoor, P. ( 2007). A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research on the role and effectiveness of written information available to patients about individual medicines. Health Technology Assessment , 11, 1-178.
30.
Savage, I. ( 2008). What patients really really want. Pharmaceutical Journal, 281, F32.
31.
Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P., & Fishwick, L. ( 2006). A framework for understanding trust factors in web-based health advice. International Journal of Human Computer Studies , 64, 697-713.
32.
Sless, D., & Wiseman, R. ( 2004). Writing about medicines for people: Usability guidelines for consumer medicines information (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Communication Research Institute of Australia.
33.
Treweek, S., Pitkethly, M., Cook, J., Kjeldstrøm, M., Taskila, T., Johansen, M., . . . Mitchell, E. ( 2010). Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , (4), MR000013. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub5
34.
van den Haak, M.J., De Jong, M.D.T., & Schellens, P.J. (2003). Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue . Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 339-351.
35.
van Teijlingen, E., & Forrest, K. ( 2004). The range of qualitative research methods in family planning and reproductive health care. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 30, 171-173.
