This article describes the development and implementation of a mixed methods data collection method designed to provide high-quality data on the circumstances surrounding abortion in Madhya Pradesh, India. Data collection took place between 2000 and 2002, beginning with a qualitative phase and culminating in a large-scale, representative survey. The survey itself melded a unique narrative interviewing technique with quantitative survey techniques and collected information on 11,341 individual pregnancies from 2,444 women, with a 97% response rate. Abortion rates calculated using these data are found to be roughly five times higher than the National Family Health Survey-2, a comparable sample using more traditional interviewing techniques, suggesting that this approach reduces the underreporting of abortion while providing the contextual information often lacking in survey data.
Ahmed, M.K., Rahman, M., & van Ginneken, J. (1998). Induced abortion in Matlab, Bangladesh: Trends and determinants. International Family Planning Perspectives, 24(3), 128-132.
2.
Ahmed, M.K., van Ginneken, J., & Razzaque, A. ( 2005). Factors associated with adolescent abortion in a rural area of Bangladesh. Tropical Medicine and International Health , 10, 198-205.
3.
Ahmed, S., Islam, A., Khanum, P.A., & Khuda, B. ( 1999). Induced abortion: What’s happening in rural Bangladesh . Reproductive Health Matters, 7(14), 19-29.
4.
Bandewar, S. ( 2001). Abortion legislation and access to safe abortion care services: The Indian experience. In B. Klugman & D. Budlender (Eds.), Advocating for abortion access: Eleven country studies (pp. 135-155). Johannesburg, South Africa: Women’s Health Project .
5.
Barreto, T., Campbell, O.M.R., Davies, J.L., & Fauveau, V. ( 1992). Investigating induced abortion in developing countries: Methods and problems. Studies in Family Planning, 23(3), 159-170.
6.
Berer, M. ( 2004). National laws and unsafe abortions: The parameters of change. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24, Suppl.), 1-8.
7.
Bernardi, L., Keim, S., & Von der Lippe, H. (2007). Social influences on fertility: A comparative mixed methods study in Eastern and Western Germany . Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 23-47.
8.
Bleek, W. ( 1987). Lying informants: A fieldwork experience from Ghana. Population and Development Review, 13(2), 314-322.
9.
Bongaarts, J. ( 1978). A framework for measuring the proximate determinates of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4(1), 105-132.
10.
Casterline, J. ( 1989). Collecting data on pregnancy loss: A review of evidence from the World Fertility Survey. Studies in Family Planning , 20(2), 81-95.
11.
Chhabra, R., & Nuna, S. ( 1994). Abortion in India: An overview. New Delhi, India: Veerendra Press.
12.
Chhabra, R., & Nuna, S. ( 1996). Abortion in India: An overview. Demography India, 25(1), 83-92.
13.
Department of Family Welfare. (1998). Yearbook 1997-98. New Delhi, India: Author.
14.
Duggal, R. ( 2004). The political economy of abortion in India: Cost and expenditure patterns. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24, Suppl.), 130-137.
15.
Duggal, R., & Ramachandran, V. (2004). The Abortion Assessment Project-India: Key findings and recommendations. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24, Suppl.), 122-129.
16.
Elul, B., Barge, S., Verma, S., Kumar, N., Bracken, H., & Sadhvani, H. ( 2004). Unwanted pregnancy and induced abortion in Rajasthan, India. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
17.
Foreit, K., & Nortman, D. ( 1992). A method of calculating rates of induced abortion . Demography, 29(1), 127-137.
18.
Ganatra, B. ( 2000). Abortion research in India: What we know, and what we need to know. In S. Jejeebhoy & R. Ramasubban (Eds.), Women’s reproductive health in India (pp. 186-235). New Delhi, India: Rawat.
19.
Ganatra, B., & Hirve, S. ( 2003). Induced abortions: Decision-making, provider choice and morbidity experience among rural adolescents in India. In S. Bott, S. Jejeebhoy , I. Shah, & C. Puri (Eds.), Towards adulthood: Exploring the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents in South Asia (pp. 127-130). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
20.
Ganatra, B., Hirve, S., Walawalkar, S., Garda, L., & Rao, V. ( 2000, February-March). Induced abortions in rural Western Maharashtra: Prevalence and patterns. Paper presented at the conference ‘‘Reproductive Health in India: New Evidence and Issues,’’Pune, India.
21.
Gill, K., Pande, R., & Malhotra, A. ( 2007). Women deliver for development. Lancet , 370, 1347-1357.
22.
Grimes, D., Benson, J., Singh, S., Romero, M., Ganatra, B., Okonofua, F., & Shah, I. ( 2006). Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic. Lancet, 368, 1908-1919.
23.
Henshaw, S., Singh, S., & Haas, T. ( 1999). The incidence of abortion worldwide. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25(Suppl.), S30-S38.
24.
Hirve, S.S. ( 2004). Abortion law, policy and services in India: A critical review. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24, Suppl.), 114-121.
25.
Huntington, D., Mensch, B., & Miller, V.C. ( 1996). Survey questions for the measurement of induced abortion . Studies in Family Planning, 27(3), 155-161.
26.
Huntington, D., Mensch, B., & Toubia, N. ( 1993). New approach to eliciting information about induced abortion . Studies in Family Planning, 24(2), 120-124.
27.
International Institute for Population Sciences. ( 2007). 2005-2006 National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3): Fact sheet, Madhya Pradesh (Provisional data). Mumbai, India: Author.
28.
International Institute for Population Sciences, & Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India (Vol. 1). Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences.
29.
International Institute for Population Sciences, & ORC Macro. (2001). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2): India 1998-99: Madhya Pradesh. Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences.
30.
Jejeebhoy, S. ( 1998). Adolescent sexual and reproductive behavior: A review of the evidence from India. Social Science & Medicine , 46, 1275-1290.
31.
Jejeebhoy, S. ( 2000). Women’s autonomy in rural India: Its dimensions, determinants, and the influence of context. In H. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 204-238). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
Johnston, H.B. ( 2002). Abortion practice in India: A review of literature . Mumbai, India: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes/Healthwatch.
33.
Johnston, H.B., & Hill, K.H. ( 1996). Induced abortion in the developing world: Indirect estimates . International Family Planning Perspectives, 22(3), 108-114.
34.
Jones, E.F., & Forrest, J.D. ( 1992). Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women: 1976-1988. Demography, 29(1), 113-126.
35.
Karkal, M. ( 1991). Abortion laws and the abortion situation in India . Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, 4(3), 223-230.
36.
Khan, M., Barge, S., Kumar, N., & Almorth, S. ( 1999). Abortion in India: Current situation and future challenges . In S. Pachuri & S. Subramanian (Eds.), Implementing a reproductive health agenda in India: The beginning (pp. 507-529). New Delhi, India: Population Council.
37.
Koster-Oyekan, W. ( 1998). Why resort to illegal abortion in Zambia? Findings of a community-based study in western province. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 1303-1312.
38.
Lara, D., Strickler, J., Olavarrieta, C.D., & Ellertson, C. ( 2004). Measuring induced abortion in Mexico. Sociological Methods and Research, 32, 529-558.
39.
Magnani, R., Rutenberg, N., & McCann, H.G. (1996). Detecting induced abortions from reports of pregnancy terminations in DHS calendar data. Studies in Family Planning, 27(1), 36-43.
40.
Mundingo, A., & Indriso, C. (Eds.). (1999). Abortion in the developing world. New Delhi, India: Vistaar .
41.
Nidadavolu, V., & Bracken, H. ( 2006). Abortion and sex determination: Conflicting messages in information materials in a district of Rajasthan, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 14(27), 160-171.
42.
Office of the Registrar General. (2001). Census of India 2001. New Delhi, India: Author.
43.
Paxman, J.M., Rizo, A., Brown, L., & Benson, J. ( 1993). The clandestine epidemic: The practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America. Studies in Family Planning, 24(4), 205-226.
44.
Ramachandar, L., & Pelto, P.J. ( 2004). Abortion providers and safety of abortion: A community-based study in a rural district of Tamil Nadu, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24, Suppl.), 138-146.
45.
Rossier, C. ( 2003). Estimating induced abortion rates: A review. Studies in Family Planning, 34(2), 87-102.
46.
Saha, S. ( 2003). Methodological issues in abortion estimation. Mumbai, India: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes/Healthwatch.
47.
Sedgh, G., Henshaw, S.K., Singh, S., Bankole, A., & Drescher, J. ( 2007). Legal abortion worldwide: Incidence and recent trends . Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(4), 216-225.
48.
Sedgh, G., Hussain, R., Bankole, A., & Singh, S. ( 2007). Women with an unmet need for contraception in developing countries and their reasons for not using a method (Occasional Rep. No. 37). New York, NY: Alan Guttmacher Institute.
49.
Singh, S., & Wulf, D. ( 1994). Estimated levels of induced abortion in six LatinAmerican countries. International Family Planning Perspectives , 20(1), 4-13.
50.
Tezcan, S., & Omran, A. ( 1981). Prevalence and reporting of induced abortion in Turkey: Two survey techniques. Studies in Family Planning , 12, 262-271.
51.
Toulemon, L., & Leridon, H. ( 1992). Maltrise de la fecondite et appartenance sociale: Contraception, grossesses accidentelles et avortements. [Birth control and social group: Contraception, accidental pregnancies and abortion]. Population , 47(1), 1-45.
52.
Varkey, P., Balakrishna, P.P., Prasad, J.H., Abraham, S., & Joseph, A. ( 2000). The reality of unsafe abortion in a rural community in South India. Reproductive Health Matters, 8(16), 83-91.
53.
Whittaker, A. ( 2002). Eliciting qualitative information about induced abortion: Lessons from northeast Thailand. Health Care for Women International , 23, 631-642.
54.
Yinger, N. ( 1998). Unmet need for family planning: Reflecting women’s perspectives. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.
55.
Yount, K.M., & Gittelsohn, J. (2008). Comparing reports of health-seeking behavior from the integrated illness history and a standard child morbidity survey. Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 2(1), 23-62.
