Adamson, J. (2005). Combined qualitative and quantitative designs . In A. Bowling & S. Ebrahim (Eds.), Handbook of health research methods. Investigation, measurement and analysis (pp. 230-245). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
2.
Barbour, R.S. (1999). The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4, 39-43.
3.
Baum, F. (1995). Researching public health: Behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Social Science & Medicine, 40, 459-468.
4.
Bradley, F., Wiles, R., Kinmonth, A.-L., Mant, D., & Gantley, M. (1999). Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: Case study of the Southampton Heart Integrated Care Project (SHIP). British Medical Journal, 318, 711-715.
5.
Campbell, N., Murray, E., Darbyshire, J., Emery, J., Farmer, A., Griffiths, F., et al. (2007). Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. British Medical Journal, 334, 455-459.
6.
Campbell, R., Quilty, B., & Dieppe, P. (2003). Discrepancies between patients' assessments of outcome: qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 326, 252-253.
7.
Caracelli, V.J., & Greene, J.C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 195-207.
8.
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 45-53.
9.
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., et al. (2006). Conducting a critcial interpretative synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 35. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1559637&blobtype=pdf
10.
Donovan, J., Mills, N., Smith, M., Brindle, L., Jacoby, A., Peters, T., et al. (2002). Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. British Medical Journal, 325, 766-770.
Forthofer, M.S. (2003). Status of mixed methods in the health sciences . In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (pp. 527-540). London: Sage.
13.
Medical Research Council. (2000). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Author .
14.
Moffatt, S., White, M., Mackintosh, J., & Howel, D. (2006). Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research: What happens when mixed method findings conflict? BMC Health Services Research, 6, 28. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16524479
15.
Morse, J. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
16.
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 85. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/85
17.
O'Cathain, A., & Thomas, K. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods . In C. Pope & N. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative research in health care (3rd ed., pp. 102-111). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
18.
Oakley, A., Strange, V., Bonell, C., Allen, E., Stephenson, J., & Team, R.S. (2006). Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. British Medical Journal, 332, 413-416.
19.
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research . British Medical Journal, 311, 42-45.
20.
Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence. A guide to methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Open University Press.
21.
Rallis, S.F., & Rossman, G.B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (pp. 491-512). London: Sage.
22.
Riley, T., Hawe, P., & Shiell, A. (2005). Contested ground: How should qualitative evidence inform the conduct of a community intervention trial? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 103-110.
23.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioural sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (pp. 3-50). London: Sage.