This article describes the development of a mixed methods approach in a study of the financial implications of the death of a partner. The authors seek to integrate analysis and interpretation of quantitative data from the British Household Panel Survey with qualitative, in-depth interviews with recently bereaved people. A key aim is to build a team that is constantly sharing ideas and information from the two components to inform the combined methodology. The article shows how we are trying to mix methods and integrate ways of working, giving details of the practicalities and issues arising thus far. We further reflect on how integrated team working may lead to more inclusive and consensual ways of knowing and influence integrated outputs.
Anderson, I., Kemp, P., & Quilgars, D. (1993). Single homeless people (Department of the Environment report). London: HMSO.
2.
Archer, J. (1999). The nature of grief: The evolution and psychology of reactions to loss. London: Routledge .
3.
Brannen, J. (2005). Mixing methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 173-184.
4.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.
5.
Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
7.
Byrne, G., & Raphael, B. (1994). A longitudinal study of bereavement phenomena in recently widowed elderly men. Psychological Medicine, 24, 411-421.
8.
Chesson, R., & Todd, C. (1996). Bereaved carers: Recognising their needs. Elderly Care, 8, 16-18.
9.
Corden, A., & Hirst, M. (2005). Financial consequences of the death of a partner [Research proposal to the UK Economic and Social Research Council]. York, UK: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
10.
Corden, A., Sainsbury, R., & Sloper, P. (2001). Financial implications of the death of a child . London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
11.
Corden, A., Sainsbury, R., Sloper, P., & Ward, B. (2005). Using a model of group psychotherapy to support social research on sensitive topics. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 151-160.
12.
Crane, M., & Warnes, A. (2001). Older people and homelessness: Prevalence and causes. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 16, 1-14.
13.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Drakeford, M. (1998). Last rights? Funerals, poverty and social exclusion . Journal of Social Policy, 27, 507-524.
15.
General Register Office for Scotland(2005). Deaths by sex, age and marital status, Scotland, 1997-2004. Edinburgh, UK: Author.
16.
Greene, J., Benjamin, L., & Goodyear, L. (2001). The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation, 7, 25-44.
17.
Hammersley, M. (1992). Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide . In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. London: Avebury.
18.
Jenkinson, A. (2003). Past caring: The beginning not the end. Edinburgh, UK: Promenade.
19.
Kemp, P., Bradshaw, J., Dornan, P., Finch, N., & Mayhew, E. (2004). Routes out of poverty: A research review. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
20.
Law Commission. (2007). Cohabitation: The financial consequences of relationship breakdown (Cm. 7182). London: Author.
21.
Mason, J. (2006, July). Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social science research (Real Life Methods Working Paper). Manchester, UK: Department of Sociology, University of Manchester.
22.
Norris, F., & Murrell, S. (1990). Social support, life events, and stress as modifiers of adjustment to bereavement by older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 429-436.
23.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2005 , March). Excluded older people (Interim report). London: Social Exclusion Unit.
24.
Office for National Statistics. (2005). 2003-based marital status and cohabitation projections for England and Wales. Population Trends, 121, 77-84.
25.
Office for National Statistics. (2006). Mortality statistics: General series DH1, no. 37. Annual review of the registrar general on deaths in England and Wales.London: Author.
26.
Padgett, D. (1998). Multimethod research: The synergy of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In D. Padgett (Ed.), Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards (pp. 126-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research practice . London: Sage.
28.
Shaw, A., Walker, R., Ashworth, K., Jenkins, S., & Middleton, S. (1996). Moving off income support: Barriers and bridges (Department of Social Security, Research Report No. 53). London: HMSO.
29.
Smith, N., & Middleton, S. (2007). A review of poverty dynamics research in the UK . York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation .
30.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003a). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
31.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Taylor, M. (Ed.). (with Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane , E.). (2006). British Household Panel Survey user manual: Vol. A. Introduction, technical report and appendices. Colchester, UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
33.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples . Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
34.
Wong, S. (2005). The Human Rights Act 1998 and the shared home: Issues for cohabitants. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27, 265-279.
