Bliss, L.A.
,
Rocco, T.
, &
Bliss, L.B.
(2004, April).
Mixed methods: Surrender in the paradigm wars
? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego , CA.
2.
Brannen, J.
(2005).
Mixing methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process
. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3),
173-184
.
3.
Creswell, J.W.
(2007, May). Exploring the dialectic tensions in the discourse in mixed methods: What is mixed methods research? Paper presented at the QI2007 Conference,
Urbana-Champaign, IL
.
4.
Creswell, J.W.
, &
Plano Clark, V.L.
(2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.
Thousand Oaks
,
CA: Sage
.
5.
Elliot, J.
(2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
London: Sage Ltd
.
6.
Freshwater, D.
(2007).
Reading mixed methods research: Contexts for criticism
. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2),
134-146
.
7.
Gilbert, T.
(2006).
Mixed methods and mixed methodologies: The practical, the technical, and the political
. Journal of Research in Nursing , 11(3),
205-217
.
8.
Greene, J.C.
(2006).
Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry
. Research in the Schools, 13(1),
93-99
.
9.
Greene, J. C.
, &
Caracelli, V. J.
(Eds.) (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 74.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
.
10.
Greene, J.C.
,
Caracelli, V.J.
, &
Graham, W.F.
(1989).
Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation designs
. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 11(3),
255-274
.
11.
Guba, E.G.
(1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In
E. G. Guba
(Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-30).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
12.
Johnson, R.B.
,
Onwuegbuzie, A.J.
, &
Turner, L.A.
(2007).
Toward a definition of mixed methods research
. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2),
112-133
.
13.
Leahey, E.
(2007).
Convergence and confidentiality? Limits to the implementation of mixed methodology
. Social Science Research , 36,
149-158
.
14.
LeCompte, M.D.
, &
Schensul, J.J.
(1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research (ethnographer's toolkit, Vol. 1).
Walnut Creek
,
CA: Altamira
.
15.
Luck, L.
,
Jackson, D.
, &
Usher, K.
(2006).
Case study: A bridge across the paradigms
. Nursing Inquiry, 13(2),
103-109
.
16.
Maxcy, S.J.
(2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In
A. Tashakkori
&
C. Teddlie
(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (p. 51-89).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
17.
Mertens, D.M.
(2007).
Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice
. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2),
212-225
.
18.
Morgan, D.L.
(2007).
Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods
. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1),
48-76
.
19.
Page, S.E.
(2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
20.
Reichardt, C.S.
&
Rallis, S.E.
(1994). The relationship between the qualitative and quantitative research traditions. In
C. S. Reichardt
&
S. F. Rallis
(Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives (New directions for program evaluation, No. 61, pp. 5-11).
San Francisco
,
CA: Jossey-Bass
.
21.
Ridenour, C.
,
Newman, I.
, &
Newman, C.
(in press). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum.
Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
.
22.
Rihoux, B.
, &
Grimm, H.
(2006). Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative divide.
New York: Springer
.
23.
Sale, J.E.M.
,
Lohfeld, L.H.
, &
Brazil, K.
(2002).
Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research
. Quality & Quantity , 36,
43-53
.
24.
Sandelowski, M.
(1996).
Using qualitative methods in intervention studies
. Research in Nursing & Health, 19,
359-364
.
25.
Sandelowski, M.
(2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In
A. Tashakkori
&
C. Teddlie
(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 321-350).
Thousand Oaks
,
CA: Sage
.
26.
Tashakkori, A.
(2006, July).
Growing pains? Agreements, disagreements, and new directions in conceptualizing mixed methods
. Keynote address presented at the Second Annual Mixed Methods Conference, Cam-bridge, UK.
27.
Tashakkori, A.
, &
Teddlie, C.
(1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Thousand Oaks
,
CA: Sage
.
28.
Tashakkori, A.
, &
Teddlie, C.
(Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research.
Thousand Oaks
,
CA: Sage
.
29.
Teddlie, C.
, &
Tashakkori, A.
(2006).
A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods
. Research in the Schools, 13(1),
12-28
.
30.
Teddlie, C.
, &
Tashakkori, A.
(in press). Foundations of mixed methods research .
Thousand Oaks
,
CA: Sage
.
31.
Yin, R.K.
(2006).
Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel?Research in the Schools, 13(1),
41-47
.