Health and social care researchers, in their haste to ``belong'' to academia, have adopted the system of mixed methodology research, overestimating its ability to reveal the truth and occasionally imprisoning their thought in one system. In this article, some of the assumptions underpinning mixed methodology research and its discourse are subjected to an interrogative reading. Every reading is an act of criticism and every reader a critic. To read literature is to practice criticism, that is, to read one way and not another. Examples are given of writing regarding mixed methods research in health care from within the critical contexts of author—audience and literature—reality. The aim of the article is to examine the language used to represent mixed methods research within a particular context rather than focus on actual mixed methods research studies.
Alsop, D.
, &
Walsh, C.
(1999). The practice of reading.
London : McMillan
.
2.
Bakhtin, M.M.
, &
Volosinov, V.N.
(1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language.
London: Harvard University Press
.
3.
Barbour, R.S.
(1999).
The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. Journal of Health Services ResearchPolicy, 4,
39-43
.
Barthes, R.
(1981). Theory of the text. In
R. Young
(Ed.), Untying the text: A post structuralist reader (pp. 133-161).
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
.
6.
Baudrillard, J.
(1995). Simulcra and simulation.
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
.
7.
Bazeley, P.
(1999).
The Bricoleur with a computer: Piecing together qualitative and quantitative data
. Qualitative Health Research , 9(2),
279-287
.
8.
Bennett, A.
, &
Royle, N.
(2004). Literature, criticism and theory. Harlow, UK:
Pearson
.
9.
Bryman, A.
(2006). Mixed methods.
London: Sage
.
10.
Creswell, J.W.
(1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
11.
De Man, P.
(1986). The resistance to theory.
Manchester
, UK:
Manchester University Press
.
12.
DeMarco, R.
(2002).
Two theories/a sharper lens: The staff nurse voice in the workplace
. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(6),
549-556
.
13.
Derrida, J.
(1974). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.).
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
14.
Fish, S.
(1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
15.
Foss, C.
, &
Ellefsen, B.
(2002).
The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation
. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(2),
242-248
.
16.
Freshwater, D.
(2005, July)
Reading mixed methods research: Contexts for criticism
. Paper presented at Mixed Methods Research Conference, Homerton College, Cambridge, UK.
17.
Freshwater, D.
(2006).
Integrating mixed methods into healthcare. Journal of Research
in Nursing, 5(11),
179-181
.
18.
Freshwater, D.
, &
Avis, M.
(2004).
Analysing interpretation and reinterpreting analysis
. Nursing Philosophy, 5,
1-8
.
19.
Green, L.
(2005).
Musical meaning and social reproduction: A case for retrieving autonomy
. Education Philosophy and Theory, 37,
77- 92
.
20.
Holloway, I.
, &
Freshwater, D.
(in press). Narrative research in nursing.
Oxford
, UK:
Blackwell
.
21.
Howe, K.R.
(2004).
A critique of experimentalism
. Qualitative Inquiry, 10,
42-61
.
22.
Iser, W.
(1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett.
London: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
23.
Johnstone, P.L.
(2004).
Mixed methods, mixed methodology in health services research in practice
. Qualitative Health Research, 14(2),
259-271
.
24.
Keesey, D.
(2002). Contexts for Criticism. (4th ed.)
New York: MCGraw-Hill
.
25.
Lincoln, Y.S.
, &
Guba, E.G.
(2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In
N. K. Denzin
&
Y. S. Lincoln
(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., Chap. 6).
London: Sage
.
26.
Mark, A.
(1993).
Researching the doctor manager—Choosing valid methodologies
. Journal of Management in Medicine, 7(4),
52-59
.
27.
Mertens, D.
(2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
28.
Risjord, M.W.
,
Dunbar, S.B.
, &
Moloney, M.F.
(2002).
A new foundation for methodological triangulation
. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(3),
269-275
.
29.
Rolfe, G.
(2001).
Postmodernism for healthcare workers in 13 easy steps
. Nurse Education Today, 21,
38-47
.
30.
Rolfe, G.
, &
Freshwater, D.
(2004). Deconstructing evidence based practice.
London: Routledge
.
31.
Rorty, R.
(1992). The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method .
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
32.
Shih, F.J.
(1998).
Triangulation in nursing research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose
. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(3),
631-641
.
33.
Webb, E.J.
,
Campbell, D.T.
,
Schwartz, R.D.
,
Sechrest, L.
, &
Grove, J.B.
(1981). Nonreactive measures in the social sciences (2nd ed.).
Boston: Houghton Mifflin
.
34.
Westwood, T.
(2005).
The dynamics of academia: Rewriting referencing
. Psychodynamic Practice, 11,
4
.
35.
Wilbur, K.
(1983). Eye to eye: The quest for a new paradigm.
Garden City, NY: Shambhala
.
36.
Wilbur, K.
(2001). A theory of everything.
Dublin
, Ireland:
Gateway
.
