This study extends the research on atmospheric conditions and scoring in sporting events by examining components of air density as it relates to National Football League (NFL) games. Statistically significant results were found in relation to the role of humidity in explaining the difference between actual scoring and the betting market total for NFL games. Simple wagering strategies based on humidity, wind speed, and a combination of these factors were shown to reject market efficiency. From game statistics, it appears that humidity may unexpectedly influence the rushing game, leading to greater than expected scoring when humidity is high.
BahillT., BaldwinD., & RambergJ. (2009). Effects of altitude and atmospheric conditions on the flight of a baseball. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, 3, 109–128.
2.
BorghesiR. (2008). Weather biases in the NFL totals market. Applied Financial Economics, 18, 947–953.
3.
BrownW. O., & SauerR. D. (1993). Does the basketball market believe in the hot hand?American Economic Review, 83, 1377–1386.
4.
FiglewskiS. (1979). Subjective information and market efficiency in a betting market. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 75–88.
5.
HirshleiferD., & ShumwayL. (2003). Good day sunshine: Stock returns and the weather. Journal of Finance, 58, 1009–1032.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2002). Market inefficiency and a profitable betting rule: Evidence from totals on professional football. Journal of Sports Economics, 3, 256–263.
8.
PaulR., WeinbachΑ., & WeinbachC. (2014). Lhe impact of atmospheric conditions on the baseball totals market. International Journal of Sport Finance, 9, 249–260.
9.
RollR. (1984). Orange juice and weather. American Economic Review, 74, 861–880.
10.
RollR. (1988). R2. Journal of Finance, 43, 541–566.
