Previous research examining referee bias in football (soccer) has not distinguished between incidents (goals, substitutions, fouls, cards) in regulation and in stoppage time. This study examines the determinants of stoppage time seconds in matches of the English Premier League using data from the second half of all close matches of the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons with a two-goal (n=634) and one-goal differential (n=478). The regression results show that the number of goals scored, substitutions, and yellow cards in the regulation 45 minutes of the second half and in stoppage time have a significant positive effect on stoppage time. Yet, only fouls in stoppage time have a significant positive effect, but not fouls in regulation. Referees awarded more added time for incidents in stoppage time than in regulation. Also, the number of seconds lost for injuries during the second half was not fully mirrored.
AllenW. D. (2002). Crime, punishment, and recidivism. Lessons from the National Hockey League.Journal of Sports Economics, 3, 39–60.
2.
BalmerN. J., NevillA. M., & LaneA. M. (2005). Do judges enhance home advantage in European championship boxing?Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 409–416.
3.
BalmerN. J., NevillA. M., & WilliamsA. M. (2003). Modelling home advantage in the Summer Olympic Games.Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 469–478.
4.
BoykoR. H., BoykoA. R., & BoykoM. G. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership football.Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1185–1194.
5.
BuraimoB., ForrestD., & SimmonsR. (2010). The 12th man? Refereeing bias in English and German soccer.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 173, 431–449.
6.
CampbellB., & GalbraithJ. W. (1996). Nonparametric tests of the unbiasedness of Olympic figure-skating judgments.The Statistician, 45, 521–526.
7.
DawsonP., & DobsonS. (2010). The influence of social pressure and nationality on individual decisions: Evidence from the behaviour of referees.Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 181–191.
8.
DawsonP., DobsonS., GoddardJ., & WilsonJ. (2007). Are football referees really biased and inconsistent? Evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English Premier League.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 170, 231–250.
9.
DohmenT. J. (2008). The influence of social forces: Evidence from the behavior of football referees.Economic Inquiry, 46, 411–424.
10.
DownwardP., & JonesM. (2007). Effects of crowd size on referee decisions: Analysis of the FA Cup.Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1541–1545.
GaricanoL., Palacios-HuertaI., & PrendergastC. (2005). Favoritism under social pressure.The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 208–216.
17.
JohnstonR. (2008). On referee bias, crowd size and home advantage in the English soccer Premiership.Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 563–568.
18.
MillsB. M. (2014). Social pressure at the plate: Inequality aversion, status, and mere exposure.Managerial and Decision Economics, 35, 387–403.
19.
MongeonK., & LongleyN. (2015). Testing for ethnicity discrimination among NHL referees: A duration model approach.Eastern Economic Journal, 41, 86–101.
20.
PageK., & PageL. (2010). Alone against the crowd: Individual differences in referees’ ability to cope under pressure.Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 192–199.
21.
Pettersson-LidbomP., & PriksM. (2010). Behavior under social pressure: Empty Italian stadiums and referee bias.Economic Letters, 108, 212–214.
22.
PriceJ., & WolfersJ. (2010). Racial discrimination among NBA referees.The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1859–1887.
23.
ReillyB., & WittR. (2013). Red cards, referee home bias and social pressure: Evidence from English Premiership Soccer.Applied Economics Letters, 20, 710–714.
24.
RiedlD., StraussB., HeuerA., & RubnerO. (2015). Finale furioso: referee-biased injury times and their effects on home advantage in football.Journal of Sports Sciences, 33, 327–336.
25.
RochaB., SanchesF., SouzaI., & da SilvaJ. C. D. (2013). Does monitoring affect corruption? Career concerns and home bias in football refereeing.Applied Economics Letters, 20, 728–731.
26.
RodenbergR. M., & LimC. H. (2009). Payback calls: A starting point for measuring basketball referee bias and impact on team performance.European Sport Management Quarterly, 9, 375–387.
27.
RottenbergS. (1956). The baseball players’ labor market.Journal of Political Economy, 64, 242–258.
28.
ScoppaV. (2008). Are subjective evaluations biased by social factors or connections? An econometric analysis of soccer referee decisions.Empirical Economics, 35, 123–140.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
ZitzewitzE. (2006). Nationalism in winter sports judging and its lessons for organizational decision making.Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15, 67–99.
