Television ratings for Sunday and Monday night NFL football are examined using betting market prices as explanatory variables. Primetime broadcasts are shown to respond positively to the win percentages of the teams playing and the expected amount of scoring measured by the betting market total. The point spread, measuring uncertainty of outcome, is found to have a negative, but insignificant effect on ratings. Betting market volume is shown to be influenced by the same factors as ratings, and the residuals of betting volume, known before the game is played, is shown to have a positive and significant effect on ratings.
AlavyK., GaskellA., LeachS., & SzymanskiS. (2010). On the edge of your seat: Demand for football on television and the uncertainty of outcome hypothesis.International Journal of Sport Finance, 5, 75–95.
2.
AldrichE., ArcidianconoP., & VigdorJ. (2005). Do people value racial diversity? Evidence from Nielsen ratings.The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy: Topics in Economics Analysis and Policy, 5, Article 4.
3.
BuraimoB., & SimmonsR. (2009). A tale of two audiences: Spectators, television viewers, and outcome uncertainty in Spanish football.Journal of Economics and Business, 61, 326–338.
4.
BerkowitzJ. P., DepkenC. A.II, & WilsonD. P. (2011). When going in circles is going backward: Outcome uncertainty in NASCAR.Journal of Sports Economics, 12, 253–283.
5.
CoatesD., HumphreysB. R., & ZhouL. (2014). Reference-dependent preferences, loss aversion, and live game attendance.Economic Inquiry, 52, 959–973.
6.
ForrestD., SimmonsR., & BuraimoB. (2005). Outcome uncertainty and the couch potato audience.Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 641–661.
7.
GrimshawS. D., & BurwellS. J. (2014). Choosing the most popular NFL games in a local TV market.Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 10, 329–343.
8.
HausmanJ., & LeonardG. (1997). Superstars in the National Basketball Association: Economic value and policy.Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 586–624.
9.
HumphreysB. R., PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2013). Consumption benefits and gambling: Evidence from the NCAA basketball betting market.Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 376–386.
10.
HumphreysB. R., & ZhouL. (2014). The Louis-Schmelling paradox and the league standing effect. Economics Working Papers, 14–22, College of Business & Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
11.
KanazawaM., & FunkJ. (2001). Racial discrimination in professional basketball: Evidence from Nielsen ratings.Economic Inquiry, 39, 599–608.
12.
MongeonK., & WinfreeJ. (2012). Comparison of television and gate demand in the National Basketball Association.Sport Management Review, 15, 72–79.
13.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2007). The uncertainty of outcome and scoring effects on Nielsen ratings for Monday Night Football.Journal of Economics and Business, 59, 199–211.
14.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2010). The determinants of betting volume for sports in North America.International Journal of Sport Finance, 5, 128–140.
15.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2013). Wagering preferences of NFL bettors: Determinants of betting volume.Journal of Prediction Markets, 6, 42–55.
16.
PaulR., WeinbachA., & SmallK. (2014). The relationship between sportsbook volume and market efficiency in football betting markets.Journal of Prediction Markets, 8(2), 29–42.
17.
RustR., KamakuraW., & AlpertM. (1992). Viewer preference segmentation and viewing choice models for network television.Journal of Advertising, 21, 1–18.
18.
SalagaS., & TainskyS. (2015). The effects of outcome uncertainty, scoring, and pregame expectations on Nielsen ratings for Bowl Championship Series games.Journal of Sports Economics, 16, 439–459.
TainskyS. (2010). Television broadcast demand for National Football League contests.Journal of Sports Economics, 11, 629–640.
22.
TainskyS., & McEvoyC. (2012). Television broadcast demand in markets without local teams.Journal of Sports Economics, 13, 250–265.
23.
TainskyS., XuJ., & ZhouY. (2014). Qualifying the uncertainty of outcome effect: A game-level analysis of NFL postseason broadcast ratings.Journal of Sports Economics, 15, 219–236.
