The aim of this paper is to assess the determinants of cyclists’ performance over the season, particularly the effect of being a team leader. Several efficiency indicators are used, the most common being the number of Cycling Quotient (CQ) points accumulated by riders divided by the number of kilometers of competition. The results show that efficiency depends mainly on individual features (such as age) and the calendar of competition chosen by riders. However, the most decisive feature in enhancing rider efficiency is team status. Specifically, the estimates show that being team leader significantly increases efficiency.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation.New York, NY: Free Press.
2.
BournerF., & WeeseW. J. (1995). Executive leadership and organizational effectiveness in the Canadian Hockey League.European Journal of Sport Management, 2, 88–100.
3.
BrewerB. (2002). Commercialization in professional cycling 1950-2001: Institutional transformations and the rationalization of ‘doping'.Sociology of Sports Journal, 19, 276–301.
4.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
5.
CalvetJ. (1980). Le r le des activit s conomiques dans la structuration de la pratique sportive: le cas du cyclisme professionnel en France. Ph. Dissertation D., Grenoble, Grenoble University.
6.
CandelonB., & DupuyA. (2012). Hierarchical organization and performance inequality: Evidence from professional cycling. Working Paper No. 2012/12, Maastricht School of Management, Maastricht University.
7.
CherchyeL., & VermeulenF. (2006). Robust rankings of multidimensional performances: An application to Tour de France racing cyclists.Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 359–373.
8.
DesbordesM. (2006). The economics of cycling. In W. Andreff & S. Szymanski (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of sport (pp. 398–410). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9.
Di DomizioM., & PalombiniM. (2011). Competitivit orizzontale e verticale nel ciclismo professionistico: alcune riflessioni sul circuito pro tour.Rivista di Diritto ed Economia dello Sport, Centro di Diritto e Business dello Sport, 6, 35–54.
10.
DilgerA., & GeyerH. (2009). The dynamic of bicycle finals: A theoretical and empirical analysis of slipstreaming.Economic Analysis and Policy, 39, 429–442.
11.
IdsonT. L., & KahaneL. H. (2004). Teammates effects on pay.Applied Economics Letters, 11, 731–733.
12.
KahaneL. H. (2001). Team and player effects on NHL player salaries: A hierarchical linear model approach.Applied Economics Letters, 8, 629–632.
13.
KyleC. R. (1976). Reduction of wind resistance and power output of racing cyclist and runners traveling in groups.Ergonomics, 22, 387–397.
14.
MujikaI., & PadillaS. (2001). Physiological and performance characteristics of male professional road cyclists.Sports Medicine, 31, 479–487.
15.
RabensteinR. (1997). Some facts about the history of doping in cycling competition. In N. Oddy & R. Van der Plas (Eds.), 8th International Cycling History Conference (pp. 119–130). San Francisco, CA: Van der Plas.
16.
RebeggianiL., & TondaniD. (2008). Organizational forms in professional cycling: An examination of the efficiency of the UCI Pro Tour.International Journal of Sport Finance, 3, 19–41.
17.
RodrguezC., PrezL., PuenteV., & RodrguezP. (2013, January 8). The determinants of television audience for professional cycling: The case of Spain.Journal of Sports Economics.
18.
RoggeN., Van ReethD., & Van PuyenbroeckT. (2013). Performance evaluation of Tour de France cycling teams using Data Envelopment Analysis.International Journal of Sport Finance, 8, 236–257.
19.
SoulB., & LestrelinL. (2011). The Puerto affair: Revealing the difficulties of the fight against doping.Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 35, 186–208.
20.
TorglerB. (2007). 'La Grande Boucle': Determinants of success at the Tour de France.Journal of Sports Economics, 8, 317–331.
21.
UnwinA., TheusM., & HoffmanH. (2006), Graphics of large datasets. New York, NY: Visualizing a Million, Springer.
22.
Van ReethD. (2013). TV demand for the Tour de France: The importance of stage characteristics versus outcome uncertainty, patriotism and doping.International Journal of Sport Finance, 8, 39–60.
