This paper builds an economic model of referee behavior in the National Hockey League using period-specific, in-game data. Recognizing that referees are influenced by a desire for perceived fairness, this model isolates situations where a referee is more likely to call a penalty on one team. While prior research has focused on a systematic bias in favor of the home team, we find that referee bias also depends upon game-specific conditions that incentivize an evening of penalty calls. Refereeing games in this fashion maintains the integrity of the game, thus benefiting spectator perceptions and opportunities for financial returns.
BuraimoB., ForrestD., & SimmonsR. (2009). The 12th man?: Refereeing bias in English and German soccer.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173, 431–449.
2.
BoykoR. H., BoykoA. R., & BoykoM. G. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership football.Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1185–1194.
GaricanoL., Palacios-HuertaI., & PrendergastC. (2005). Favortism under social pressure.Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 208–216.
7.
HeckelmanJ., & YatesA. (2003). And a hockey game broke out: Crime and punishment in the NHL.Economic Inquiry, 41, 705–712.
8.
JewellR. T. (2009). Estimating demand for aggressive play: The case of English premier league football.International Journal of Sport Finance, 4, 192–210.
9.
KoyamaM., & ReadeJ. (2008). Playing like the home team: an economic investigation into home advantage in football.International Journal of Sport Finance, 4, 16–41.
10.
LeedsM., & von AllmenP. (2004). The economics of sports, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
McCullochC. E., & NeuhausJ. M. (2001). Generalized linear mixed models. Wiley Online Library. MongeonK., & MittelhammerR. (2011). Home advantage, close games, and big crowds: economics and existence of rationally biased officiating. Working paper.
12.
MoskowitzT. J., & WertheimL. J. (2011). Scorecasting: the hidden influences behind how sports are played and games are won, Crown Business: New York.
13.
NevillA. M., BalmerN. J., & WilliamsM. A. (2002). The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football.Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 261–272.
14.
National Hockey League. (2012). National Hockey League. Retrieved from www.nhl.com
15.
Petterson-LidbomP., & PriksM. (2010). Behavior under social pressure: empty Italian stadiums and referee bias.Economic Letters, 108, 212–214.
16.
PriceJ., RemerM., & StoneD. F. (2012). Subperfect game: Profitable biases of NBA referees.Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 21, 271–300.
17.
RobstJ., VanGilderJ., BerriD. J., & VanceC. (2011). Defense wins championships? The answer from the gridiron.International Journal of Sport Finance, 6, 72–84.
ScoppaV. (2008). Are subjective evaluations biased by social factors or connections: An econometric analysis of soccer referee decisions.Empirical Economics, 35: 123–140.
SutterM. & KocheraM. G. (2004). Favortism of agents-the case of referees’ home bias.Journal of Economic Psychology, 25: 461–469.
22.
WedderburnR. W. M. (1974). Generalized linear models specified in terms of constraints.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 449–454.
23.
WidmeyerW., & BirchJ. (1984). Aggression in professional ice hockey: a strategy for success or a reaction to failure?The Journal of Psychology, 117, 77–84.
24.
WidmeyerW., & McGuireE. (1997). Frequency of competition and aggression in professional ice hockey.International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 57–66.
