This paper investigates the regional economic impact of the 1996 Olympic Games in Georgia. It questions the findings of Hotchkiss, Moore, and Zobay (2003), who identify significant positive effects of the Olympics on employment in Georgia/USA by first challenging their approach that used a level shift model with no trend inclusion. Second, the original trend regressions are modified to capture spline trend shifts. Third, a nonparametric identification strategy using complex continuous treatment measures extends the original study. After controlling for the two concerns and extending the empirical strategy, this paper is not able to reject the hypothesis that there was no employment boost in Georgia caused by the Olympics.
AhlfeldtG. M. (2010). Blessing or curse? Appreciation, amenities and resistance to urban renewal.Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(1), 32–25.
2.
AhlfeldtG. M., & FeddersenA. (2010). From periphery to core: Economic adjustments to high speed rail.London School of Economics & University of Hamburg LSE research online, 29430.
3.
AhlfeldtG. M., & MaennigW. (2008). Impact of sports arenas on land values: Evidence from Berlin.The Annals of Regional Science, 44(2), 205–227.
4.
AhlfeldtG. M., & WendlandN. (2009). Looming stations: Valuing transport innovations in historical context.Economics Letters, 105(1), 97–99.
5.
AndersonJ. E., & van WincoopE. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle.American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
6.
Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games. (1997). The official report of the Centennial Olympic Game (Vol. 1, Planning and Organizing).
7.
BaadeR. A. (1987). Is there an economic rationale for subsidizing sports stadiums?Heartland Policy Study, 13.
8.
BaadeR. A., & DyeR. F. (1988). An analysis of the economic rational for public subsidization of sports stadiums.Annals of Regional Science, 22(2), 37–47.
9.
BaadeR. A., & MathesonV. A. (2002). Bidding for the Olympics: Fool's gold? In BarrosC. P., IbrahimoM. & SzymanskiS. (Eds.), Transatlantic sport: The comparative economics of North American and European sports (pp. 127–151). Cheltenham U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
10.
BaltagiB. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2 ed.). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
11.
BaumannR., EngelhardtB., & MathesonV. A. (2012). Employment Effects of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, Utah. Journal of Economics and Statistics, 232(3), 308–317.
12.
BertrandM., DufloE., & MullainathanS. (2004). How much should we trust differences-indifferences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
13.
BrakmanS., GarretsenH., & SchrammM. (2004). The strategic bombing of German cities during World War II and its impact on city growth.Journal of Economic Geography, 4(2), 201–218.
14.
CarlinoG., & CoulsonN. E. (2004). Compensating differentials and the social benefits of the NFL.Journal of Urban Economics, 56(1), 25–50.
15.
CarlinoG., & CoulsonN. E. (2006). Compensating differentials and the social benefit of the NFL: Reply.Journal of Urban Economics, 60(1), 132–138.
16.
CoatesD., & HumphreysB. R. (1999). The growth effects of sport franchises, stadia, and arenas.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), 601–624.
17.
CoatesD., & HumphreysB. R. (2001). The economic consequences of professional sports strikes and lockouts.Southern Economic Journal, 67(3), 737–747.
18.
CoatesD., & HumphreysB. R. (2003). The effect of professional sports on earnings and employment in the services and retail sectors in US cities.Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(2), 175–198.
19.
CoatesD., & HumphreysB. R. (2008). Do economists reach a conclusion on subsides for sports franchises, stadiums, and mega-events?Econ Journal Watch, 5(3), 294–315.
20.
CoatesD., HumphreysB. R., & ZimbalistA. (2006). Compensating differentials and the social benefits of the NFL: A comment.Journal of Urban Economics, 60(1), 124–131.
21.
CraftsN. (2005). Market potential in British regions, 1871-1931.Regional Studies, 39(9), 1159–1166.
22.
DachisB., DurantonG., & TurnerM. A. (2011). The effect of land transfer taxes on real estate markets: Evidence from a natural experiment in Toronto.Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 327–354.
23.
DavisD. R., & WeinsteinD. E. (2002). Bones, bombs, and break points: The geography of economic activity.American Economic Review, 92(5), 1269–1289.
24.
DavisD. R., & WeinsteinD. E. (2008). A search for multiple equilibria in urban industrial structure.Journal of Regional Science, 48(1), 29–65.
25.
EdmansA., GarcíaD., & NorliØ. (2007). Sports sentiment and stock returns.Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1967–1998.
26.
FeddersenA., & MaennigW. (2012a). Mega-events and sectoral employment: The case of the 1996 Olympic Games. Contemporary Economic Policy.
27.
FeddersenA., & MaennigW. (2012b). Sectoral labour market effects of the 2006 FIFA World Cup.Labour Economics, 19(6), 860–869.
28.
GalsterG., TatianP., & PettitK. (2004). Supportive housing and neighborhood property value externalities.Land Economics, 80(1), 33–54.
29.
GibbonsS., & MachinS. (2005). Valuing rail access using transport innovations.Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 148–169.
30.
GreeneW. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
HalvorsenR., & PalmquistR. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations.American Economics Review, 70(3), 474–475.
32.
HotchkissJ. L., MooreR. E., & ZobayS. M. (2003). Impact of the 1996 Summer Olympic Games on employment and wages in Georgia.Southern Economic Journal, 69(3), 691–704.
33.
HumphreysJ. M., & PlummerM. K. (1995). The economic impact on the State of Georgia of hosting the 1996 Summer Olympic Games.Mimeograph. Athens, Georgia: Selig Center for Economic Growth, University of Georgia.
34.
ImaizumiA., ItoK., & OkazakiT. (2008). Impact of natural disasters on industrial agglomeration: A case of the 1923 Great Kanto earthquake.University of Tokyo CIRJE F-Series, 602.
35.
JasmandS., & MaennigW. (2008). Regional income and employment effects of the 1972 Munich Summer Olympic Games. Regional Studies, 42(7), 991–1002.
36.
KeebleD., OwensP. L., & ThompsonC. (1982). Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European community.Regional Studies, 16(6), 419–432.
37.
LozanoF. A. (2011). The flexibility of the workweek in the United States: Evidence from the FIFA World Cup.Economic Inquiry, 49(2), 512–529.
38.
MaennigW., & RichterF. (2012). Exports and Olympic Games.Journal of Sports Economics, 13(6), 635–641.
39.
MarshL. C., & CormierD. R. (2001). Spline regression models.Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in Social Science, 07-137.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
MathesonV. (2006). Mega-events: The effect of the world's biggest sporting events on local, regional, and national economies. Department of Economics, College of the Holy Cross.
41.
McMillenD. P., & McDonaldJ. (2004). Reaction of house prices to a new rapid transit line: Chicago's Midway line, 1983-1999.Real Estate Economics, 32(3), 463–486.
42.
McMillenD. P., & ThorsnesP. (2000). The reaction of housing prices to information on superfund sites: A semiparametric analysis of the Tacoma, Washington Market. In T. B. Fomby & R. C. Hill (Eds.), Advances in econometrics: Applying kernel and nonparametric estimation to economic topics (Vol. 14, pp. 201–228). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
43.
McMillenD. P., & ThorsnesP. (2003). The aroma of Tacoma: Time varying average derivatives and the effect of a Superfund site on housing prices.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21(2), 237–246.
44.
ReddingS. J., & SturmD. M. (2008). The costs of remoteness: evidence from German division and reunification.American Economic Review, 98(5), 1766–1797.
45.
ReddingS. J., & VenablesA. J. (2004). Economic geography and international inequality.Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 53–82.
46.
RoseA. K., & SpiegelM. M. (2011). The Olympic effect.Economic Journal, 121(553), 652–677.
47.
Skogman ThoursieP. (2004). Reporting sick: Are sporting events contagious?Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(6), 809–823.
48.
TeiglandJ. (1999). Mega-events and impacts on tourism; The predictions and realities of the Lillehammer Olympics. Impact assessment and project.Appraisal, 17(4), 305–317.
49.
TuC. C. (2005). How does a new sports stadium affect housing values? The case of FedEx Field.Land Economics, 81(3), 379–395.
