This paper empirically illustrates the difference between a standard economic impact analysis (EIA) and a cost-benefit analysis (CBA). The EIA was conducted using an existing (input-output) I-O model (STEAM). The benefit side of the CBA included non-local visitor spending, the revenue of the local organizing committee (LOC), the consumer surplus, and public good value of the sport event for the local residents. The cost side of the CBA was estimated based on the opportunity costs related to the construction of the stadium (including labor costs and the cost of borrowing), imports, and ticket sales to locals. The EIA indicated that the 2005 Pan-American Junior Athletic Championships generated a net increase in economic activity in the city of $5.6 million. The CBA showed a negative net benefit of $2.4 million. Both methods presented challenges and limitations, but CBA has the distinct advantage that it identifies the net benefits associated with hosting a sport event.
BaadeR., & Matheson. V. (2001). Home run or wild pitch? Assessing the economic impact of Major League baseball's All-Star Game.Journal of Sports Economics, 2, 302–327.
3.
BaadeR., & MathesonV. (2006). Padding required: Assessing the economic impact of the Super Bowl.European Sports Management Quarterly, 6, 353–374.
4.
BargetE., & GouguetJ. J. (2007). The total economic value of sporting events: Theory and practice.Journal of Sports Economics, 8, 165–182.
5.
BargetE., & GouguetJ. (2010). Hosting mega-sporting events: Which decision-making rule?International Journal of Sport Finance, 5, 141–162.
6.
CampbellH. F., & BrownP. C. (2003). Benefit-cost analysis: Financial and economic appraisal using spreadsheets. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Canadian Sport Tourism Alliance. (2006). Canadian Sport Tourism Alliance: Building business through sport. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://www.canadiansporttourism.com
8.
ChalipL. (2004). Beyond impact: A general model for sport event leverage. In B. W. Ritchie & D. Adair (Eds.), Sport tourism: Interrelationships, impacts and issues (pp. 226–252). Clevedon, United Kingdom: Channel View.
CromptonJ. L. (1995). Economic impact analysis of sports facilities and events: Eleven sources of misapplication, Journal of Sport Management, 9, 14–35.
14.
CromptonJ. L. (1999). Measuring the economic impact of visitors to sport tournaments and special events. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
15.
DownwardP., LumsdonL., & RalstonR. (2005). Gender differences in sports event volunteering: Insights from Crew 2002 at the XVII Commonwealth Games. Managing Leisure, 10, 219–236.
16.
DownwardP., & RalstonR. (2006). The sport development potential of sport event volunteering: Insights from the XVII Manchester Commonwealth Games.European Journal for Sport Management, 6, 333–351.
17.
DwyerL., ForsythP., & SpurrR. (2005). Estimating the impacts of special events on an economy.Journal of Travel Research, 43, 351–359.
18.
DwyerL., ForsythP., & SpurrR. (2006a). Assessing the economic impacts of events: A computable general equilibrium approach.Journal of Travel Research, 45, 59–66.
19.
DwyerL., ForsythP., & SpurrR. (2006b). Economic impact of sport events: A reassessment.Tourism Review International, 10, 1–10.
20.
Employment Ontario. (2007). Labour market information.Current Labour Market Statistics, 7(5), 5.
21.
FalconieriS., & PalominoF. (2004). Collective versus individual sale of television rights in league sports, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 833–862
22.
GrattonC., & TaylorP. (2000). Economics of sport & recreation. London: E & FN Spon.
23.
HudsonI. (2001). The use and misuse of economic impact analysis.Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 25, 20–39.
24.
JohnsonB., & WhiteheadJ. (2000). Value of public goods from sports stadiums: The CVM approach.Contemporary Economic Policy, 18, 48–58.
25.
JohnsonB. K., GroothuisP. A., & WhiteheadJ. C. (2001). The value of public goods generated by a major league sports team: The CVM approach.Journal of Sports Economics, 2, 6–21.
26.
KésenneS. (1999). Miscalculations and misinterpretations in economic impact analysis. In J. Jeanrenaud (Ed.), The economic impact of sport events (pp. 29–39). Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Center International d'Etude du Sport.
27.
KésenneS. (2005). Do we need an economic impact study or a cost-benefit analysis of a sports event?European Sport Management Quarterly, 5, 133–142
LefebreM., ArcandA., SutherlandG., ArmstrongM., & WiebeR. (2008). Metropolitan outlook 2: Economic insight into 27 Canadian metropolitan economies. Ottowa, Canada: Conference Board of Canada.
30.
Local Organizing Committee. (2005). Final report: 2005 Pan-American Junior Athletic Championships. Ontario, Canada: University of Windsor.
31.
MathesonV. (2006). Is smaller better? A comment on “Comparative Economic Impact Analyses” by Michael Mondello and Patrick Rishe.Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 192–195. doi:10.1177/0891242405285872
32.
MathesonV. (2009). Economic multipliers and mega-event analysis.International Journal of Sport Finance, 4, 63–70.
MondelloM., & RisheP. (2004). Comparative economic impact analyses: Differences across cities, events, and demographics.Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 331–342. doi:10.1177/0891242404269505
35.
MulesT., & DwyerL. (2005). Public sector support for sport tourism events: The role of cost benefit analysis.Sport in Society, 8, 338–355.
36.
PorterP. K., & FletcherD. (2008). The economic impact of the Olympic Games: Ex ante predictions and ex post reality.Journal of Sport Management, 22, 470–486.
37.
PreussH., SeguinB., & O'ReillyN. (2007), Profiling major sport event visitors: The 2002 Commonwealth Games. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 12, 5–23.
38.
PutsisW. P. (1998). Winners and losers: Redistribution and the use of economic impact analysis in marketing.Journal of Macromarketing, 18, 24–33.
39.
RobinsonM. J., & GammonS. (2004). A question of primary and secondary motives: Revisiting and applying the sport tourism framework.Journal of Sport Tourism, 9, 221–233.
SchafferM., GreerA., & MauboulosC. (2003). Olympic costs & benefits: A cost-benefit analysis of the proposed Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games. Vancouver, Canada: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternative.
42.
SnelgroveR., TaksM., ChalipL., & GreenB. C. (2008). How visitors and locals at a sport event differ in motives and identity. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 13, 165–180.
43.
TaksM., ChalipL., GreenB. C., KesenneS., & MartynS. (2009). Factors affecting repeat visitation and flow-on tourism as sources of event strategy sustainability.Journal of Sport and Tourism, 14, 121–142.
44.
TaksM., GreenB. C., ChalipL., KesenneS., & MartynS. (in press). Visitor composition and event-related spending.International Journal of Culture, Tourism, and Hospitality Research.
45.
WalkerM., & MondelloM. J. (2007). Moving beyond economic impact: A closer look at the contingent valuation method.International Journal of Sport Finance, 2, 149–160.
46.
WaltonH., LongoA., & DawsonP. (2008). A contingent valuation of the 2012 London Olympic Games: A regional perspective. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 304–317.
47.
WilligR. D. (1976). Consumer's surplus without apology.American Economic Review, 66, 589–597.
48.
WilsonR. (2006). The economic impact of local sport events: Significant, limited or otherwise? A case study of four swimming events.Managing Leisure, 11, 57–70.
