This paper investigates the statistical relationship between European regional development and the competitiveness of professional soccer teams. Using data on more than 140 European regions (NUT2) from the period 1990-2006, it concludes that professional soccer teams are more likely to show superior performance if their head offices are located in population-dense regions that have a high GDP and in highly urbanized areas.
AndreffM., AndreffW., & PoupauxS. (2008). Les eeterminants economiques de la performance olympique.Working Papers 0819, International Association of Sports Economists.
2.
BernardA., & BusseM. (2004). Who wins the Olympic Games: Economic resources and medal totals.The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 413–417.
3.
DownwardP., & DawsonA. (1999). The demand for professional team sports: Traditional findings and new developments.Business School Working Paper, 997
4.
ClinchJ., & MurphyA. (2001). Modelling winners and losers in contingent valuation of public goods: Appropriate welfare measures and econometric analysis.The Economic Journal, 111, 420–443.
5.
GriffithsR., BassettK., & SmithI. (2003). Capitalising on culture: Cities and the changing landscape of cultural policy.Policy and Politics, 31(2), 153–169.
6.
GrossmanG. (2004). The distribution of talent and the pattern and consequences of international trade.Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 209–239.
7.
GuthrieJ., PenfieldD., & EvansD. (1969). Geographic distribution of teaching talent.American Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 645–659
HsiaoC. (2002). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HutchisonD., & CoxR. (2007). The causal relationship between bank capital and profitability.Annals of Financial Economics, 3, 40–54.
13.
KriströmB. (1997). Spike models in contingent valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1013–1023.
14.
LeedsE., & LeedsM. (2009). International soccer success and national institutions.Journal of Sports Economics, 10, 369–390.
15.
MathesonV. (2009), Economic multipliers and mega-event analysis. International Journal of Sport Finance, 4(1), 63–70.
16.
MathesonV., HoffmannR., LeeC., & RamasamyB. (2003). Comparing the socio-economic determinants of men's and women's international soccer performance.CEABur Working Paper, 1.
17.
MathesonV., & BaadeR. (2004). Mega-sporting events in developing nations: Playing the way to prosperity?South African Journal of Economics, 72(5), 1085–1096.
18.
MoosaI., & SmithL. (2004). Economic development indicators as determinants of medal winning at the Sydney Olympics: An extreme bounds analysis.Australian Economic Papers, 43(3), 288–301.
19.
MourãoP. (2008). Local development and competitive soccer teams location: The Portuguese case.Investigaciones Regionales, 12, 135–143.
20.
Nair-ReichertU., & WeinholdD. (2001). Causality tests for cross-country panels: A new look at FDI and economic growth in developing countries.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63(2), 153–171.
21.
NardoM.. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide.OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2005/3.
