Home advantage in football varies over time. Existing theories of home advantage struggle to explain this time-series variation. We argue that the decline in home advan- tage in English football since the mid-1980s was partly caused by the advent of tele- vised football. We argue that the increase in live television coverage of football matches has worked to incentivize players to not to shirk when playing in away games, as sup- porters can now more effectively monitor their efforts. We test this hypothesis using both time-series and panel-data econometrics.
AlchianA. A., & DemsetzH. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
2.
AttrillM. J., GrestyK. A., HillR. A., & BartonR. A. (2008). Red shirt colour is associated with long-term team success in English football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(6), 577–582.
3.
AudasR., DobsonS., & GoddardJ. (1997). Team performance and managerial change in the English Football League. Economic Affairs, 17(3), 30–37.
4.
BerriD. J., & KrautmannA. C. (2006). Shirking on the court: Testing for the incentive effects of guaranteed pay. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 536–546.
5.
BoykoR. H., BoykoA. R., & BoykoM. G. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership Football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(11), 1185–1194.
6.
BrandesL., & FranckE. (2007). Who made who who? An empirical analysis of competitive balance in European soccer leagues. Eastern Economic Journal, 33(3), 379–403.
7.
ClarkeS. R., & NormanJ. M. (1995). Home ground advantage of individual clubs in English soccer. The Statistician, 44(4), 509–521.
8.
DixonM. J., & RobinsonM. E. (1998). A birth process model for association football matches. The Statistician, 47(3), 523–538.
9.
DohmenT. J. (2008). The influence of social forces: Evidence from the behavior of football referees. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 411–424.
10.
DoornikJ. A. (2006). Autometrics: Further applications of automatic model selection. Mimeo, Nuffield College.
11.
DoornikJ. A., & HendryD. F. (2007). Modelling dynamic systems using PcGive 12: Volume III. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.
12.
ForrestD., BeaumontJ., GoddardJ., & SimmonsR. (2005). Home advantage and the debate about competitive balance in professional sports leagues. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), 439–445.
13.
HendryD. F. (1995). Dynamic econometrics, advanced texts in econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
HendryD. F., & Krolzig, H.-M. (2001). Automatic econometric model selection using PcGets. London: Timberlake Consultants Ltd.
15.
HendryD. F., & Krolzig, H.-M. (2005). The properties of automatic GETS modeling. Economic Journal, 115(502), C32-C61.
16.
HendryD. F., & ReadeJ. J. (2007). Modeling and forecasting using model averaging. Working papers, Department of Economics, University of Oxford.
17.
HolmstromB. (1999). The firm as a subeconomy. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15(1), 74–102.
18.
HolmstromB., & MilgromP. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7(0), 24–52.
19.
JacklinP. B. (2005). Temporal changes in home advantage in English football since the second world war: What explains improved away performance?Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(7), 669–679.
20.
JohnstonR. (2008). On referee bias, crowd size, and home advantage in the English Soccer Premiership. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(6), 563–568.
21.
KarauS. J., & WilliamsK. D. (1981). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 681–706.
22.
KarlisD., & NtzoufrasI. (2003). Analysis of sports data using bivariate poisson models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Statistician), 52, 381–393.
23.
KnowlesG., MurrayJ., SheronyK., & HaupertM. (2003). Shirking in Major League Baseball in the era of the reserve clause. NINE: A Journal of Baseball History and Culture, 12(1), 59–71.
24.
KoningR. H. (2000). Balance in competition in Dutch soccer. The Statistician, 49(3), 419–431. Krautmann A. C. (1990). Shirking or stochastic productivity in Major League Baseball? Southern Economic Journal, 56(4), 961–968.
25.
KrautmannA. C. (1993). Shirking or stochastic productivity in Major League Baseball: Reply. Southern Economic Journal, 60(1), 241–243.
26.
LataneB., WilliamsK., & HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.
27.
LidenR. C., WayneS. J., JaworskiR. A., & BennettN. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285–304.
28.
MarburgerD. R. (2003). Does the assignment of property rights encourage or discourage shirking?: Evidence from Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 4(1), 19–34.
29.
MaxcyJ. G., FortR.D., & KrautmannA. C. (2002). The effectiveness of incentive mechanisms in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(3), 246–255.
30.
McHaleI., & ScarfP. (2007). Modelling soccer matches using bivariate discrete distributions with general dependence structure. Statistica Neerlandica, 61(4), 432–445.
31.
McMasterR. (1997). The market for corporate control in professional football: Is there an agency problem?Economic Affairs, 17(3), 25–29.
32.
MilesJ. A., & GreenbergJ. (1993). Using punishment threats to attenuate social loafing effects among swimmers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(2), 246–265.
33.
MillerG. J. (1992). Managerial dilemmas, the political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
34.
NalebuffB. J., & StiglitzJ. E. (1983). Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1), 21–43.
35.
NeaveN., & WolfsonS. (2003). Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage’. Physiology & Behavior, 78(2), 269–275.
36.
NevillA. M., NewellS. M., & GaleS. (1996). Factors associated with home advantage in English and Scottish soccer matches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 14(2), 181–186.
37.
PollardR. (2005). Evidence of a reduced home advantage when a team moves to a new stadium. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(12), 969–973.
38.
PollardR. (2006). Worldwide regional variations in home advantage in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(3), 231–240.
39.
PollardR., & PollardG. (2005). Long-term trends in home advantage in professional team sports in North America and England (1876-2003). Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), 337–350.
40.
SloaneP. J. (1971). The economics of professional football: The football club as a utility maximiser. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 18(2), 121–46.
41.
SutterM., & KocherM. G. (2004). Favoritism of agents-The case of referees’ home bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(4), 461–469.
42.
SzymanskiS., & SmithR. (1997). The English football industry: Profit, performance and industrial structure. International Review of Applied Economics, 11(1), 135–153.
43.
TiroleJ. (1999). Incomplete contracts: Where do we stand?Econometrica, 67(4), 741–781.
44.
WolfsonS., WakelinD., & LewisM. (2005). Football supporters’ perceptions of their role in the home advantage. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), 365–374.
