This paper analyzes the changes induced by the newly introduced UCI Pro Tour on the behavior of racing teams. We develop an oligopolistic model starting from the well-known Cournot framework to analyze why the UCI Pro Tour fails to reach its primary aim, namely to increase overall competition among professional cycling teams. In particular we show that the pattern of non-competitive behavior displayed by race teams is the result of a poorly designed Pro Tour licensing assignment procedure. Empirical findings confirm that teams put forth low effort in a high percentage of tour events, reserving their greatest effort for races organized in their home countries. This less-than-optimal per- formance pattern is the result of an organizational design that focuses solely on financial requirements and does not include incentives related to race performance. The study concludes with the recommendation that the current “closed league” organizational structure be replaced with a relegation system.
Amaury Sport Organization (2002–2006): Offizielles Programm. Tour de France2006, German edition by ARD/ZDF/SR, Saarbrücken. [Various volumes].
4.
BaadeR. (2003). Evaluating subsidies for professional sports in the United States and Europe: A public-sector primer.Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 585–597.
5.
BerentsenA. (2002). The economics of doping.European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 109–127.
6.
BertrandJ. (1883). Théorie matematique de la richesse sociale.Journal des Savants, 67, 499–508.
7.
BrewerB. D. (2002). Commercialization in professional cycling.Sociology of Sport Journal, 19, 276–301.
8.
BuchananJ. (1965). An economic theory of clubs.Economica, 32(February), 1–14.
9.
CarusoR. (2005). Asimmetrie negli incentivi, equilibrio competitivo e impegno agonistico: Distorsioni in presenza di doping e combine.Rivista di Diritto ed Economia dello Sport, 1(3), 1338.
10.
CherchyeL., & VermeulenF. (2006). Robust rankings of multidimensional performances: An application to Tour de France racing cyclists.Journal of Sports Economics, 7(4), 359–373.
11.
CournotA. (1838). Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses [Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth]. English edition, 1897. London: MacMillan.
12.
Deloitte (2006). Annual Report, Manchester.
13.
DesbordesM. (2006). The economics of cycling. In W. Andreff & S. Szymanski (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of sport (pp. 398410). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
14.
DilgerA. (2002). Zur Dynamik im Finale von Radrennen: Analyse des Windschattenfahrens. In Heinz-Dieter Horch & Jörg Heydel/Axel Sierau (Eds.), Finanzierung des Sports: Beiträge des 2 (pp. 214–223). Aachen: Kölner Sportökonomie-Kongresses.
15.
DilgerA., & TonsdorfF. (2004). Wettbewerbsintensität und Doping: Eine theoretische und empirische Untersuchung, Working Paper No. 131. Herdecke: Universität Witten.
16.
DobsonS., & GoddardJ. (2001). The Economics of Football. Cambridge University Press.
17.
FortR. D. (2003). Sports Economics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
FortR. D., & MaxcyJ. (2003). Competitive balance in sports leagues: An introduction.Journal of Sports Economics, 4(2), 154–160.
19.
GershkovA., LiJ., & SchweinzerP. (2007). Efficient tournaments in teams. Working paper, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
20.
HaugenK. K. (2004). The performance-enhancing drug game.Journal of Sports Economics, 5(1), 67–86.
21.
HohenauerR. (2006). Gerüchte werfen uns drei Monate zurück!Sponsors, 5, 22.
22.
HotellingH. (1929). Stability in competition.Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.
23.
JutelA. (2002). Olympic road cycling and national identity: Where is Germany?Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 26(2), 195–208.
24.
LessingH. E. (2003). Automobilität Karl Drais und die unglaublichen Anfänge. Leipzig: Maxime Verlag Maxi Kutschera.
25.
LynchJ. G., & ZaxJ. S. (2000). The rewards to running: Prize structure and performance in professional road racing.Journal of Sports Economics, 1(4), 323–340.
26.
MaennigW. (2002). On the economics of doping and corruption in international sport.Journal of Sport Economics, 3(1), 61–89.
27.
Mas-ColellA., WhinstonM. D., & GreenJ. D. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
NealeW. C. (1964). The peculiar economics of professional sport: A contribution to the theory of the firm in sporting competition and in market competition.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78(1), 1–14.
29.
NollR.G. (2002). The economics of promotion and relegation in sport leagues.Journal of Sport Economics, 3(2), 169–203.
30.
PrinzJ. (2005). Every second counts: The influence of money and body weight in professional road racing—Empirical evidence from the Tour de France. Working paper, Universität Witten, Herdecke, Germany.
31.
RabensteinR. (1996): Radsport und Gesellschaft: Ihre sozialgeschichtlichen Zusammenhänge in der Zeit von 1867 bis 1914, 2nd ed. Hildesheim: Weidmann.
32.
RebeggianiL. (2006). Public vs. private spending for sports facilities—The case of Germany 2006. Public Finance and Management, 6(3), 395–435.
33.
RossS. F., & SzymanskiS. (2000). Public open competition in league sport, law and economics working paper No. 00–07. Working Papers Series, University of Illinois College of Law.
RSN - Radsportnews (2006): Große Radsportnationen sehen ProTour gescheitert. Retrieved July 23, 2006, from http://www.radsport-news.com
36.
SavulescuJ., & FoddyB., & ClaytonM. (2004): Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sport.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 38, 666–670.
37.
SchröderR. (2002). Radsport: Geschichte - Kultur - Praxis, Göttingen: Die Werkstatt.
38.
SchröderR. (2005). Lexikon Radsport, Göttingen: Die Werkstatt. SchmidtM. B. & BerriD. J. (2005): Concentration of playing talent: Evolution in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 6(4), 412–419.
39.
ShmanskeS. (2004). Golfonomics. Hackensack: NJ: World Scientific Publishing Company.
40.
SiegfriedJ., & ZimbalistA. (2000). The economics of sport facilities and their communities.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 95–114.
41.
SowellC.B., MountsW. S. (2005). Ability, age, and performance: Conclusions from the Ironman Triathlon World Championship.Journal of Sports Economics, 6(1), 78–97.
42.
StrulikH. (2007). Riding high—Success in sports and the rise of doping cultures. Discussion Paper No. 372, Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
43.
SzymanskiS. (2003). The economic design of sporting contests.Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 1137–1187.
44.
SzymanskiS. & VallettiT. M. (2005): Promotion and relegation in sporting contests. Rivista di Politica Economica, 95(5/6), 3–39.
45.
TondaniD. (2005): I ranking internazionali come rimedio alle asimmetrie informative negli sport individuali: Il caso del ciclismo professionistico.Rivista di diritto ed economia dello sport, 1(2), 93–117.
46.
TorglerB. (2007): ‘La Grande Boucle': Determinants of success at the Tour de France.Journal of Sports Economics, 8(3), 317–331.
47.
UCI (2006). UCI cycling regulations. Retrieved March 30, 2006, from http://www.uci.ch
48.
VroomanJ. (1997): Franchise free agency in professional sport leagues. Southern Economic Journal 63, 191–219.
49.
WhittleJ. (2006): Geldmaschine Tour de France A.S.O. (2006). Offizielles Programm. Tour de France 2006, German edition by ARD/ZDF/SR, Saarbrücken, 32-33.
