Environmental engineering design is a key course for students in environmental engineering, as it aims to develop their skills in analyzing, evaluating, and solving environmental problems. However, with the rapid development of modern information technology (IT), this course needs to adapt to the changing times and leverage the benefits of modern IT. In this article, the applications, role, and influence of modern IT in environmental engineering design are discussed, the relevant practical cases demonstrating the use of modern IT applications are presented, and some suggestions to improve and enhance the course by using modern IT are proposed. Modern IT can not only improve the teaching outcomes and quality of environmental engineering design but also stimulate students’ creativity and practical abilities, as well as foster innovation and optimization in the teaching methods and content of environmental engineering design. This article has the potential to advance the field of environmental engineering education.
AbdulrahamanMD, FarukN, OloyedeAA, et al.Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon2020;6(11):e05312; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
2.
AhlemannF, DittesS, FillbrunnT, et al.Managing in-company IT standardization: A design theory. Inf Syst Front2023;25(3):1161–1178; doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10277-2
3.
Al-JumailiAH, MuniyandiRC, HasanMK, et al.Big data analytics using cloud computing based frameworks for power management systems: Status, constraints, and future recommendations. Sensors (Basel)2023;23(6):2952; doi: 10.3390/s23062952
4.
AlmusaedA, AlmssadA, YitmenI, et al.Enhancing student engagement: Harnessing “AIED”‘s power in hybrid education—A review analysis. Educ Sci (Basel)2023;13(7):632; doi: 10.3390/educsci13070632
5.
AlosaimiM. The role of knowledge management approaches for enhancing and supporting education. Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I: Paris, France; 2016.
6.
AlwakidWN, DahriNA, HumayunM, et al.Exploring the role of AI and teacher competencies on instructional planning and student performance in an outcome-based education system. Systems (Basel)2025;13(7):517; doi: 10.3390/systems13070517
7.
AsliK, SefikaG. The effect of E-STEM education on students’ perceptions and engineering design process about environmental issues. World Journal of Education2022;12(6):49–55; doi: 10.5430/wje.v12n6p49
BaharuddinB, AmperaD, FebriasariH, et al.Implementation of cloud computing system in learning system development in engineering education study program. IJEMST2021;9(4):728–740; doi: 10.46328/ijemst.2114
10.
BayraktarOM, MutluA. Analyses of industrial air pollution and long-term health risk using different dispersion models and WRF physics parameters. Air Qual Atmos Health2024;17(10):2277–2305; doi: 10.1007/s11869-024-01573-8
11.
BereczkiEO, KárpátiA. Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Think Skills Creat2021;39:100791; doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791
12.
BerselliG, BilanciaP, LuziL. Project-based learning of advanced CAD/CAE tools in engineering education. Int J Interact Des Manuf2020;14(3):1071–1083; doi: 10.1007/s12008-020-00687-4
13.
BersonIR, BersonMJ, LuoW. Innovating responsibly: Ethical considerations for AI in early childhood education. AI Brain Child2025;1(1):2; doi: 10.1007/s44436-025-00003-5
14.
BettiolS, PsereckisR, MacintyreK. A perspective of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and public health. Front Public Health2022;10:1058383; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058383
15.
BhutoriaA. Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence2022;3:100068; doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
16.
Bin QushemU, ChristopoulosA, KaliisaR, et al.Technology-enhanced Learning and Learning Analytics for personalized STEM learning: A scoping review. Int J Educ Res2025;134:102827; doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102827
17.
BungayHR. Environmental engineering education in the modern era. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany; 2021.
18.
BurrSA, GaleT, KisielewskaJ, et al.A narrative review of adaptive testing and its application to medical education. MedEdPublish2023;13:221; doi: 10.12688/mep.19844.1
19.
CaponeR, LeporeM. From distance learning to integrated digital learning: A fuzzy cognitive analysis focused on engagement, motivation, and participation during COVID-19 pandemic. Tech Know Learn2022;27(4):1259–1289; doi: 10.1007/s10758-021-09571-w
20.
CendanB, AriasA, EstévezS, et al.Sustainability in the treatment of wastewater from canning industry effluents. Water Resour Ind2026;35:100361; doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2026.100361
D’eliaP, StalmachA, Di SanoS, et al.Strategies for inclusive digital education: Problem/project-based learning, cooperative learning, and service learning for students with special educational needs. Front Educ2025;9:1447489; doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1447489
24.
DaleG, DotroG, SrivastavaP, et al.Education in ecological engineering—a need whose time has come. CircEconSust2021;1(1):333–373; doi: 10.1007/s43615-021-00067-4
25.
DawoodM, TuSS, XiaoCB, et al.Cyberattacks and security of cloud computing: A complete guideline. Symmetry (Basel)2023;15(11):1981; doi: 10.3390/sym15111981
26.
DetmerA. Higher education global data report, working document. UNESCO: Paris, France; 2022.
27.
DhawanS. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems2020;49(1):5–22; doi: 10.1177/0047239520934018
28.
DwivediYK, HughesL, BaabdullahAM, et al.Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manage2022;66:102542; doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
29.
EdwardsG, LiH, WangB. BIM based collaborative and interactive design process using computer game engine for general end-users. Vis in Eng2015;3(1):4; doi: 10.1186/s40327-015-0018-2
30.
ElnaggarA. Nine principles of green heritage science: Life cycle assessment as a tool enabling green transformation. Herit Sci2024;12(1):7; doi: 10.1186/s40494-023-01114-z
31.
El-SabaghHA. Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. Int J Educ Technol High Educ2021;18(1):53; doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
32.
EsparragozaIE, MesaJA, MauryHE. Introducing sustainability in engineering design education: A case study using analysis of impacts during the design for sustainability (AID-DS). In: 15th International Design Conference. 2018:2429–2440. 10.21278/idc.2018.0108
33.
FabrizS, MendzheritskayaJ, StehleS. Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Front Psychol2021;12:733554; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
34.
FarleyIA, BurbulesNC. Online education viewed through an equity lens: Promoting engagement and success for all learners. Review of Education2022;10(3):e3367; doi: 10.1002/rev3.3367
FloresMA. Teaching and learning in teacher education: Agency, reflection and identity. European Journal of Teacher Education2023;46(4):557–560; doi: 10.1080/02619768.2023.2266256
37.
FriedmanAL. Continuing professional development as lifelong learning and education. International Journal of Lifelong Education2023;42(6):588–602; doi: 10.1080/02601370.2023.2267770
38.
GhamrawiN, ShalT, GhamrawiN. Exploring the impact of AI on teacher leadership: Regressing or expanding? Educ Inf Technol2024;29(7):8415–8433; doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12174-w
39.
GolightlyL, ChangV, XuQA, et al.Adoption of cloud computing as innovation in the organization. International Journal of Engineering Business Management2022;14:18479790221093992; doi: 10.1177/18479790221093992
40.
GuanN, SongJX, LiDM. The application of multimedia technology in senior English teaching. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Forum on Management, Education and Information Technology Application (IFMEITA 2017). IFMEITA; 2018;432–437; doi: 10.2991/ifmeita-17.2018.73
41.
Guaña-MoyaJ, Arteaga-AlcívarY, Criollo-CS, et al.Use of interactive technologies to increase motivation in university online courses. Educ Sci (Basel)2024;14(12):1406; doi: 10.3390/educsci14121406
42.
GümüşMM, KayhanO, KukulV, et al.Preparing teachers to integrate technology in education according to SQD model: Scale development and validation. Educ Inf Technol2024;29(4):3993–4023; doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11978-0
43.
Hadi MogaviR, DengC, Juho KimJ, et al.ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans2024;2(1):100027; doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027
44.
HaleemA, JavaidM, QadriMA, et al.Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers2022;3:275–285; doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
45.
HamlaouiS. Teachers’ resistance to educational change and innovations in the middle east and North Africa: A case study of tunisian universities. Springer Fachmedien: Wiesbaden; 2021.
46.
HowardN, EdwardsR, BoutisK, et al.Twelve tips for using learning curves in health professions education research. MedEdPublish2023;13:269; doi: 10.12688/mep.19723.1
47.
HuangB. Web-based dynamic and interactive environmental visualization. Comput Environ Urban Syst2003;27(6):623–636; doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00063-7
48.
HussainA. Use of geographical information system (GIS) application in public libraries. LHTN2023;40(6):9–14; doi: 10.1108/LHTN-11-2022-0126
49.
JingDG. Beyond distance education. Future of Global Open Universities: Cambridge, UK; 2021.
50.
KamalovF, Santandreu CalongeD, GurribI. New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability2023;15(16):12451; doi: 10.3390/su151612451
51.
KhorET, KM. A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in supporting personalized learning. Educ Sci (Basel)2023;14(1):51; doi: 10.3390/educsci14010051
52.
KhorsandiM, KobraA, GhobadzadehM, et al.Online vs. traditional teaching evaluation: A cross-sectional study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences2012;46:481–483; doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.145
53.
KirschkeS, NewigJ. Addressing complexity in environmental management and governance. Sustainability2017;9(6):983; doi: 10.3390/su9060983
54.
KoehlerMJ, MishraP, CainW. What Is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? The. Journal of Education2013;193(3):13–19; doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24636917
55.
KonyaA, NematzadehP. Recent applications of AI to environmental disciplines: A review. Sci Total Environ2024;906:167705; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167705
56.
KwikimaMM, NgoleF. GIS-based optimization of solid waste collection points and routes: A case study of Majengo Ward, Sumbawanga Municipality, Tanzania. Cleaner Waste Systems2025;12:100372; doi: 10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100372
57.
LamprousisGD, GolfinopoulosSK. The integrated energy community performance index (IECPI): A multidimensional tool for evaluating energy communities. Urban Science2025;9(7):264; doi: 10.3390/urbansci9070264
58.
LerNJ. Technology aided learning application for wetlands ecology using constructivism approach. Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman: Malaysia; 2023.
59.
LiY, DaiJ, CuiL. The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model. Int J Prod Econ2020;229:107777; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777
60.
LiY. Inheritance and development of traditional culture: A new path for design education reform in China. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University: Hong Kong, China; 2021.
61.
LiY. Research on the development of environmental design education based on digital media technology. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies2025;20(1):1–15; doi: 10.4018/IJWLTT.387414
62.
LimMA, AnaboIF, PhanANQ, et al.The state of higher education in Southeast Asia. SHARE Project Management Office ASEAN Secretariat: Jakarta, Indonesia; 2022.
63.
LiuQ, KhalilM. Understanding privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics using a systematic review. Brit J Educational Tech2023;54(6):1715–1747; doi: 10.1111/bjet.13388
64.
LiuS, ZaighamGHK, RashidRM, et al.Social media-based collaborative learning effects on student performance/learner performance with moderating role of academic self-efficacy. Front Psychol2022;13:903919; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903919
65.
LoNP. The confluence of digital literacy and eco-consciousness: Harmonizing digital skills with sustainable practices in education. Platforms2024;2(1):15–32; doi: 10.3390/platforms2010002
66.
LoNPK, WongAMH. Reimagining teaching and learning in higher education in the post-COVID-19 era: The use of recorded lessons from teachers’ perspectives. Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore; 2023.
67.
LudererG, PehlM, ArvesenA, et al.Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies. Nat Commun2019;10(1):5229; doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13067-8
68.
MajorL, FrancisGA, TsapaliM. The effectiveness of technology-supported personalised learning in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology2021;52(5):1935–1964; doi: 10.1111/bjet.13116
69.
MarougkasA, TroussasC, KrouskaA, et al.Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics (Basel)2023;12(13):2832; doi: 10.3390/electronics12132832
70.
MartinelliA, FabiocchiD, PicchioF, et al.Design of an environment for virtual training based on digital reconstruction: From real vegetation to its tactile simulation. Designs (Basel)2025;9(2):32; doi: 10.3390/designs9020032
71.
MartirosovAL, AlexJ, DoaneA, et al.Podcasts and videos and slides…oh my!: Traditional vs. nontraditional teaching methods in remote settings. Curr Pharm Teach Learn2023;15(6):587–592; doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.06.007
72.
MarzialettiF, CesariniG, AcostaATR, et al.Testing effectiveness in nature reserve management using GIS-based tools: A 25 years monitoring of land use change in a Mediterranean coastal wetland. Wetlands Ecol Manage2024;32(3):423–435; doi: 10.1007/s11273-024-09985-0
73.
MasicI, PandzaH, ToromanovicS, et al.Information technologies (ITs) in medical education. Acta Inform Med2011;19(3):161–167; doi: 10.5455/aim.2011.19.161-167
74.
MatosT, SantosW, ZdravevskiE, et al.A systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in education: Emerging trends and challenges. Decision Analytics Journal2025;15:100571; doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100571
75.
MavriA, IoannouA, LoizidesF. A model for enhancing creativity, collaboration and pre-professional identities in technology-supported cross-organizational communities of practice. Educ Inf Technol2024;29(11):13325–13366; doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12295-2
76.
MccoolLB, MitchellA. Teaching for a digital world: Foundations, practices, and possibilities. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly2024;87(2):272–299; doi: 10.1177/23294906231157084
77.
MengYY, XuW, LiuZQ, et al.Scientometric analyses of digital inequity in education: Problems and solutions. Humanit Soc Sci Commun2024;11(1):1052; doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03480-w
78.
MhlongoS, MbathaK, RamatsetseB, et al.Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon2023;9(6):e16348; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
79.
MoiranoR, SánchezMA, ŠtěpánekL. Creative interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic literature review. Think Skills Creat2020;35:100626; doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100626
80.
NaseerF, TariqR, AlshahraniHM, et al.Project based learning framework integrating industry collaboration to enhance student future readiness in higher education. Sci Rep2025;15(1):24985; doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10385-4
81.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Environmental engineering for the 21st century: Addressing grand challenges. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC; 2019.
82.
NgDTK, LeungJKL, SuJ, et al.Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educ Technol Res Dev2023;71(1):137–161; doi: 10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
83.
NgwenyaB, PaepaeT, BokoroPN. Monitoring ambient water quality using machine learning and IoT: A review and recommendations for advancing SDG indicator 6.3.2. J Water Process Eng2025;73:107664; doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107664
84.
NowinskiCJ, DewaltDA, CarterAS, et al.Recommendations for assessment of social, emotional, and behavioral health for the national children’s study. Front Pediatr2021;9:624524; doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.624524
85.
NtiEK, CobbinaSJ, AttafuahEE, et al.Environmental sustainability technologies in biodiversity, energy, transportation and water management using artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Sustainable Futures2022;4:100068; doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100068
86.
OgunyemiAA, QuaicoeJS, BautersM. Indicators for enhancing learners’ engagement in massive open online courses: A systematic review. Comput Educ Open2022;3:100088; doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100088
87.
Oliva-CórdovaLM, TohomMFV, Salazar De La CruzRC, et al.Application of learning analytics in medical education: Enhancing student digital competences within the STEAM framework. Int J Educ Res Open2025;9:100511; doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100511
88.
PaarP. Landscape visualizations: Applications and requirements of 3D visualization software for environmental planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst2006;30(6):815–839; doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.07.002
PanXQ. Online learning environments, learners’ empowerment, and learning behavioral engagement: The mediating role of learning motivation. Sage Open2023;13(4):21582440231205098; doi: 10.1177/21582440231205098
91.
PanYQ, ZhuMY, LvY, et al.Building energy simulation and its application for building performance optimization: A review of methods, tools, and case studies. Advances in Applied Energy2023;10:100135; doi: 10.1016/j.adapen.2023.100135
92.
PeiT, XuJ, LiuY, et al.GIScience and remote sensing in natural resource and environmental research: Status quo and future perspectives. Geography and Sustainability2021;2(3):207–215; doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.08.004
93.
PubuleJ, KalnbalkiteA, TeirumniekaE, et al.Evaluation of the environmental engineering study programme at university. Environmental and Climate Technologies2019;23(2):310–324; doi: 10.2478/rtuect-2019-0070
94.
ReimersFM. Schools and society during the COVID-19 pandemic: How education systems changed and the road ahead. Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland; 2024.
95.
ReychavI, ElyakimN, MchaneyR. Lifelong learning processes in professional development for online teachers during the Covid era. Front Educ2023;8:1041800; doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1041800
96.
RoshanaeiM, OlivaresH, LopezRR. Harnessing AI to foster equity in education: Opportunities, challenges, and emerging strategies. JILSA2023;15(4):123–143; doi: 10.4236/jilsa.2023.154009
SaabMM, MccarthyM, O’mahonyB, et al.Virtual reality simulation in nursing and midwifery education: A usability study. Comput Inform Nurs2023;41(10):815–824; doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001010
99.
SarkerIH. Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci2021;2(3):160; doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x
100.
ShehabiA, SmithSJ, SartorDA, et al.United states data center energy usage report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA; 2016.
101.
SidiropoulosP, PapadomanolakisA, LyraA, et al.A modelling framework for the hydraulic simulation of a water distribution system under data scarcity: Application in the city of Farsala, Greece. Applied Sciences2025;15(11):6124; doi: 10.3390/app15116124
102.
Sola-GuiradoRR, Guerrero-VacasG, Rodríguez-AlabandaÓ. Teaching CAD/CAM/CAE tools with project-based learning in virtual distance education. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr)2022;27(4):5051–5073; doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10826-3
103.
SolmazS, Dominguez AlfaroJL, SantosP, et al.A practical development of engineering simulation-assisted educational AR environments. Education for Chemical Engineers2021;35:81–93; doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.007
104.
SosaOG, ManzuoliCH. Models for the pedagogical integration of information and communication technologies: A literature review. Ensaio: avalpolpúblEduc2019;27(102):129–156; doi: 10.1590/s0104-40362018002701720
105.
StensethHV, SteindalSA, SolbergMT, et al.Simulation-based learning supported by technology to enhance critical thinking in nursing students: Protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Res Protoc2022;11(4):e36725; doi: 10.2196/36725
106.
SutcliffeM, NobleK. Belonging, trust and social isolation: The move on-line during the time of COVID—A longitudinal study. Heliyon2022;8(9):e10637; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10637
107.
SyeedMM, ShihavuddinA, UddinMF, et al.Outcome based education (OBE): Defining the process and practice for engineering education. IEEE Access2022;10:119170–119192; doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3219477
108.
The Global Education Monitoring Report Team. Global education monitoring report 2025, regional edition on leadership in education, East Asia: lead for technology. UNESCO: Paris, France; 2025.
109.
The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (Oecd). Better criteria for better evaluation: Revised evaluation criteria definitions and principles for use. OECD Publishing: Paris, France; 2019; doi:10.1787/15a9c26b-en
110.
TremblayK, Minea-PicA, BoeskensL, et al.Policies for the digital transformation of school education: State of play and key policy responses. OECD Conference Centre. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris, France; 2023.
111.
TuyenPT, DuyTN, PhongVT. Design and deployment of an IoT-based air quality monitoring system. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development2021;12(5):139–145; doi: 10.18178/ijesd.2021.12.5.1331
VintereA. Case study on sustainable environmental behavior in engineering education. Engineering For Rural Development2020;1:1509–1515; doi: 10.22616/ERDev.2020.19.TF373
114.
WallweyC, LongmeierMM, HaydeD, et al.Consider “HACKS” when designing hackathon challenges: Hook, action, collaborative knowledge sharing. Front Educ2022;7:954044; doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.954044
115.
WangXF. Teaching reform of environmental design major based on studio teaching mode. In: 2019 Asia-Pacific Conference on Advance in Education, Learning and Teaching. Web of Proceedings; 2019; pp. 899–902; doi:10.25236/acaelt.2019.190
116.
WangYM. A comparative study on the effectiveness of traditional and modern teaching methods. In: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2022). ICHESS; 2022;1: 270–277; doi:10.2991/978-2-494069-89-3_32
WilliamsonB, PiattoevaN. Objectivity as standardization in data-scientific education policy, technology and governance. Learn Media Technol2019;44(1):64–76; doi: 10.1080/17439884.2018.1556215
119.
XieZ. Symmetry for multimedia-aided art teaching based on the form of animation teaching organization and social network. Symmetry (Basel)2020;12(4):671; doi: 10.3390/sym12040671
120.
XingJ, ZhangY, WangSX, et al.Modeling study on the air quality impacts from emission reductions and atypical meteorological conditions during the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Atmos Environ2011;45(10):1786–1798; doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.025
121.
XuX, YuSJ, PangN, et al.Review on A big data-based innovative knowledge teaching evaluation system in universities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge2022;7(3):100197; doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100197
122.
YinW, LukoschH, PiumsomboonT. Evaluating user engagement and learning outcomes in an augmented reality game on New Zealand wetlands conservation: AR and learning in new zealand wetlands. In: Proceedings of the 37th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI’25). 2025;1: 937–943; doi:10.1145/3764687.3769946
123.
ZhdyrevaE. Investigation into using EPAnet software to design trickle fill water distribution systems. Canada: University of Calgary: Calgary, Alberta; 2019.
124.
ZhouZQ. Empathy in education: A critical review. ij-Sotl2022;16(3):Article 2; doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2022.160302
